IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03215014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trajectories of innovative collaborative project in agrofood industry
[La trajectoire de projets collaboratifs innovants dans le secteur agro-alimentaire]

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Levy

    (ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville, LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville)

  • Pierre Triboulet

    (AGIR - AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse - INP - PURPAN - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Brice Navereau

    (LISST - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Solidarités, Sociétés, Territoires - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INP - PURPAN - Ecole d'Ingénieurs de Purpan - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse)

Abstract

Approaching innovation in terms of open innovation invites us to better unders- tand the factors promoting the circulation of knowledge, in particular the role of intermediaries acting as facilitator of the innovative processes. However, few studies have focused on the concrete modalities of interaction between innovation partners and the particular role of these interme- diaries on territories. This article aims to characterize the determinants of the dynamic of coo- peration between partners in collaborative projects labeled by a competitiveness cluster in the agrifood industry. The analytical framework is based on the joint mobilization of partners' internal resources, forms of proximity between partners, and facilitating intermediaries. The methodology is based on in-depth study of 6 projects with 22 semi-structured interviews. The originality is to explore the role of resources along the life cycle of the projects (emergence, implementation, valo- risation). The results underline the facilitating role of intermediaries in the activation of internal resources, in particular the cluster in the setup phase and the consultants providing a coordination role in the implementation phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Levy & Pierre Triboulet & Brice Navereau, 2020. "Trajectories of innovative collaborative project in agrofood industry [La trajectoire de projets collaboratifs innovants dans le secteur agro-alimentaire]," Post-Print hal-03215014, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03215014
    DOI: 10.3166/ges.2020.0013
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03215014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03215014/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3166/ges.2020.0013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bastien Bernela & Marie Ferru & Marc‐Hubert Depret, 2019. "Capturing cluster life cycle with a mixed‐method analysis: Evidence from a French cluster case study," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(4), pages 1487-1510, December.
    2. Isabelle Leroux & Paul Muller & Béatrice Plottu & Caroline Widehem, 2014. "‪Innovation ouverte et évolution des business models dans les pôles de compétitivité : le rôle des intermédiaires dans la création variétale végétale," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 115-151.
    3. Rachel Levy & Damien Talbot, 2015. "Control by proximity: Evidence from the 'Aerospace Valley' Competitiveness Cluster," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 955-972, June.
    4. Howells, Jeremy, 2006. "Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 715-728, June.
    5. Du, Jingshu & Leten, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2014. "Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 828-840.
    6. Marie Ferru, 2010. "Formation Process and Geography of Science-Industry Partnerships: The Case of the University of Poitiers," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 531-549.
    7. Sébastien Bourdin & Fabien Nadou & François Raulin, 2019. "Les collectivités locales comme acteurs intermédiaires de la territorialisation de la transition énergétique : l’exemple de la méthanisation," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 21(4), pages 273-293.
    8. Leroux Isabelle & Paul Muller & Béatrice Plottu & Caroline Widehem, 2014. "Innovation ouverte et évolution des business models dans les pôles de compétitivité : le rôle des intermédiaires dans la création variétale végétale," Post-Print hal-01113452, HAL.
    9. Ham, Rose Marie & Mowery, David C., 1998. "Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: case studies at a US weapons laboratory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 661-675, February.
    10. Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver & Jose Albors-Garrigos, 2009. "The role of the firm's internal and relational capabilities in clusters: when distance and embeddedness are not enough to explain innovation," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 9(2), pages 263-283, March.
    11. Andre Torre & Alain Rallet, 2005. "Proximity and Localization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-59.
    12. Isabelle Leroux & Paul Muller & Béatrice Plottu & Caroline Widehem, 2014. "Innovation ouverte et évolution des business models dans les pôles de compétitivité : le rôle des intermédiaires dans la création variétale végétale," Post-Print hal-02638103, HAL.
    13. Isabelle Leroux & Paul Muller & Béatrice Plottu & Caroline Widehem, 2014. "Innovation ouverte et évolution des business models dans les pôles de compétitivité : le rôle des intermédiaires dans la création variétale végétale," Post-Print hal-03539845, HAL.
    14. Cassiman, Bruno & Di Guardo, Maria Chiara & Valentini, Giovanni, 2010. "Organizing links with science: Cooperate or contract?: A project-level analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(7), pages 882-892, September.
    15. Rachel Levy & Damien Talbot, 2015. "Control by proximity: Evidence from the 'Aerospace Valley' Competitiveness Cluster," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(6), pages 955-972, June.
    16. Olivier Bouba-Olga & Marie Ferru, 2008. "Pôles de compétitivité: les limites d'une gouvernance locale de l'innovation," Post-Print hal-00460381, HAL.
    17. Torre, André, 2010. "Jalons pour une analyse dynamique des Proximités," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2010(03), pages 409-437, September.
    18. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    19. Mora-Valentin, Eva M. & Montoro-Sanchez, Angeles & Guerras-Martin, Luis A., 2004. "Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 17-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Damien Talbot, 2018. "Proximités et contrôles," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 1099-1119.
    2. Marie Ferru & Marie-Pierre Renée Bes & Michel Grossetti, 2011. "Measuring social proximity in the geography of innovation," Post-Print halshs-01395667, HAL.
    3. Damien Talbot & Sandra Charreire-Petit & Alexis Pokrovsky, 2020. "La proximité comme perception de la distance. Le cas de la télémédecine," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(4), pages 51-74.
    4. Bastien Bernela & Rachel Levy, 2017. "Collaboration networks within a French cluster: Do partners really interact with each other?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(1), pages 115-138, March.
    5. Serge Blondel & Ngoc-Thao Noet, 2023. "Quels facteurs expliquent la faible coopération en horticulture ?," TEPP Research Report 2023-01, TEPP.
    6. Monique Combes-Joret & Sophie Bollinger, 2023. "Le rôle majeur des Établissements et Services d’Aide par le Travail (ESAT) dans les écosystèmes d’innovation sociale pour l’inclusion des personnes en situation de handicap. Le cas de l’ESAT l’ENVOL," Post-Print hal-04142261, HAL.
    7. Ferretti, Marco & Guerini, Massimiliano & Panetti, Eva & Parmentola, Adele, 2022. "The partner next door? The effect of micro-geographical proximity on intra-cluster inter-organizational relationships," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. repec:wsi:acsxxx:v:21:y:2019:i:08:n:s1363919619500117 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Annelore Huyghe & Mirjam Knockaert & Mike Wright & Evila Piva, 2014. "Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: the case of a hybrid model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 289-307, August.
    10. Lucena-Piquero, D. & Vicente, Jérôme, 2019. "The visible hand of cluster policy makers: An analysis of Aerospace Valley (2006-2015) using a place-based network methodology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 830-842.
    11. Olivier Bouba-Olga & Marie Ferru, 2011. "La dimension spatiale des collaborations pour l'innovation : une analyse sur données CIFRE (1981-2006)," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(3), pages 449-468.
    12. Charlène Lambert & Albéric Tellier, 2015. "Quel rôle peut jouer un syndicat professionnel dans un réseau inter-organisationnel innovant ? Le cas de l'Union Nationale des Entreprises de Paysage," Post-Print hal-01488067, HAL.
    13. Rachel Bocquet & Caroline Mothe, 2015. "Can a governance structure foster cluster ambidexterity through knowledge management? An empirical study of two French SME clusters," Knowledge Management Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 329-343, August.
    14. Riccardo Crescenzi & Andrea Filippetti & Simona Iammarino, 2017. "Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 730-762, August.
    15. Ingrid Fasshauer, 2020. "Open Innovation Business Models : the example of living labs in France," Post-Print hal-03312263, HAL.
    16. André Torre & Frederic Wallet Wallet, 2013. "The role of proximity relations in regional and territorial development processes," ERSA conference papers ersa13p792, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Aubry, Christine & Kebir, Leïla, 2013. "Shortening food supply chains: A means for maintaining agriculture close to urban areas? The case of the French metropolitan area of Paris," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 85-93.
    18. André Torre & Damien Talbot, 2018. "Proximités : retour sur 25 années d’analyse," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 917-936.
    19. Laurent Mériade & Benoit Nautré & Corinne Rochette & Damien Talbot, 2017. "Les effets de la Proximité sur l'exécution des politiques publiques : L'exemple d'un Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer (CLCC)," Post-Print hal-02327098, HAL.
    20. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Daniele Biancardi & Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo & Federico Biagi, 2019. "Study on Higher Education Institutions and Local Development," JRC Research Reports JRC117272, Joint Research Centre.
    21. Paul Muller & Bérangère L. Szostak & Thierry Burger-Helmchen, 2020. "The role of middleground's entrepreneurial activities for the circulation of creative ideas. The case of Krautrock Music [Le rôle d’intermédiation des activités entrepreneuriales du middleground da," Post-Print hal-03539612, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03215014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.