IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03083036.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Identifying elastic hybridity through a multilevel perspective of institutional complexity. Case study of a French prison

Author

Listed:
  • Laurine Basse

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

Abstract

Driven by external constraints and internal requirements, the prison institution is an ever-changing environment. Prisons are subject to a pendulum effect of public policy, with grey areas around the application of best practices. To theorize the alternance between various institutional requirements, we will use the institutional logics perspective and question the recent concept of elastic hybridity. Drawing on the hybrid exploratory approach, we have performed a case study of a French prison in order to understand the beliefs, discourses and practices of the penitentiary field. First, we identified four institutional logics (protection, reintegration, legal bureaucratic, and performance), characterize the field and the organization to explain antecedents of oscillation. Therefore, we analysed the concept of complexity via multi-level characteristics: the degree of conflict intensity, the degree of attention to conflict, and the degree of means' availability. Then, we identified consequences of this balancing act with greater precision through illustration of creation spaces. We illustrate how temporary organizational arrangements can shape and influence institutions through the creation of spaces for interpretation and negotiation. Therefore, our research contributes to deepening scientific knowledge in the management of societal institutions and its constant adaptation to societal challenges. The study of organizational practices resulting from the management of elastic hybridity in the penitentiary field also brings empirical contributions to institutional theory

Suggested Citation

  • Laurine Basse, 2020. "Identifying elastic hybridity through a multilevel perspective of institutional complexity. Case study of a French prison," Post-Print hal-03083036, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03083036
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03083036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03083036/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Nicholls & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2016. "Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 699-714, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabien Martinez, 2023. "Exploring the syncretic dynamics involved in dyadic business–NGO partnerships," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4068-4083, November.
    2. Christiana Weber & Helen Haugh & Markus Göbel & Hannes Leonardy, 2022. "Pathways to Lasting Cross-Sector Social Collaboration: A Configurational Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(3), pages 613-639, May.
    3. Claudia Savarese & Benjamin Huybrechts & Marek Hudon, 2021. "The Influence of Interorganizational Collaboration on Logic Conciliation and Tensions Within Hybrid Organizations: Insights from Social Enterprise–Corporate Collaborations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 709-721, November.
    4. Wendy Phillips & Elizabeth A. Alexander & Hazel Lee, 2019. "Going It Alone Won’t Work! The Relational Imperative for Social Innovation in Social Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 315-331, May.
    5. Pradeep Kumar Hota, 2023. "Tracing the Intellectual Evolution of Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Advances, Current Trends, and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 182(3), pages 637-659, January.
    6. Juelin Yin & Dima Jamali, 2021. "Collide or Collaborate: The Interplay of Competing Logics and Institutional Work in Cross-Sector Social Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 673-694, April.
    7. David Monciardini & Laura Rocca & Monica Veneziani, 2024. "Virtuous circles: Transformative impact and challenges of the social and solidarity circular economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 642-660, February.
    8. Gröbner, Sophie, 2022. "Zur Rolle interorganisationaler Beziehungen im Social Entrepreneurship – Ein systematisches Literaturreview [Inter-Organizational Relations of Social Enterprises – A Systematic Literature Review]," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(2), pages 504-523.
    9. Michael Moran & Libby Ward-Christie, 2022. "Blended Social Impact Investment Transactions: Why Are They So Complex?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(4), pages 1011-1031, September.
    10. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    11. Elizabeth J. Klitsie & Shahzad Ansari & Henk W. Volberda, 2018. "Maintenance of Cross-Sector Partnerships: The Role of Frames in Sustained Collaboration," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 401-423, June.
    12. Alinaghian, Leila & Razmdoost, Kamran, 2021. "How do social enterprises manage business relationships? A review of the literature and directions for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 488-498.
    13. Tasneem Sadiq & Rob van Tulder & Karen Maas, 2022. "Building a Taxonomy of Hybridization: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Societal Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    14. Claudia Savarese & Benjamin Huybrechts & Marek Hudon, 2020. "The Influence of Interorganizational Collaboration on Logic Conciliation and Tensions Within Hybrid Organizations: Insights from Social Enterprise–Corporate Collaborations," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/311573, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    15. Christopher Pesterfield & Michael Rogerson, 2024. "Institutional Logics in the UK Construction Industry’s Response to Modern Slavery Risk: Complementarity and Conflict," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 59-75, April.
    16. Costin Lianu & Irina Gabriela Radulescu & Simona Corina Dobre Gudei & Cosmin Lianu & Veronica Mindrescu, 2022. "Cohesion Forces Determinants in Cluster Development: A Study Case for Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-12, March.
    17. Jones, Janice & Seet, Pi-Shen & Acker, Tim & Whittle, Michelle, 2021. "Barriers to grassroots innovation: The phenomenon of social-commercial-cultural trilemmas in remote indigenous art centres," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Jisong Kim & Chang-Sik Kim & Mina Jo, 2023. "Cross-Country Analysis of Willingness to Pay More for Fair Trade Coffee: Exploring the Moderating Effect between South Korea and Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    19. Alex Gillett & Kim Loader & Bob Doherty & Jonathan M. Scott, 2019. "An Examination of Tensions in a Hybrid Collaboration: A Longitudinal Study of an Empty Homes Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 949-967, July.
    20. Chen, Shi & Bai, Hanhan & Wang, Bin & Lin, Jyh-Horng, 2024. "Social enterprise, renewable energy, and cap-and-trade under sustainable insurance," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03083036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.