IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/bracre/v56y2024i5s089083892300135x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting and reporting for facing multiple values in meso-level hybrid organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Dameri, Renata Paola
  • Benevolo, Clara
  • Demartini, Paola

Abstract

This work examines a new form of second-level hybrid, Meso-Level Hybrid Organisations (MLHOs), which do not generate an entity with a legal form or boundaries and are composed by a set of members in the organisational field, linked by multiple relationships and engaged in solving complex problems that require both public and private efforts. Our research interest is in the role that accounting and reporting systems can play in these hybrids, which do not have to comply with mandatory accounting requirements but have to respond to information pressures from their internal and external stakeholders, having different institutional logics and conflicting values and goals. By interpreting accounting and reporting as boundary objects through which value work can be enacted, the research highlights the role that accountants play in recomposing multiple values through participatory processes of designing and implementing an accounting and reporting system. A case study narrated through the discursive lens of ‘mixing, compromising and legitimising mechanisms of value creation among hybrids' shows how the design of a voluntary reporting system can, under certain conditions, strengthen an MHLO. Our findings show that a tailored accounting system can counteract the centrifugal and disruptive forces inherent in these forms of hybrid settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Dameri, Renata Paola & Benevolo, Clara & Demartini, Paola, 2024. "Accounting and reporting for facing multiple values in meso-level hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:56:y:2024:i:5:s089083892300135x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2023.101278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089083892300135X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miller, Peter & Kurunmäki, Liisa & O'Leary, Ted, 2008. "Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 942-967.
    2. Agathe Morinière & Irène Georgescu, 2021. "Hybridity and the use of performance measurement: facilitating compromises or creating moral struggles? Insights from healthcare organizations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 801-829, July.
    3. Alex Nicholls & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2016. "Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries : The Case of Fair Trade," Post-Print hal-02312323, HAL.
    4. Manville, Graham & Greatbanks, Richard, 2020. "Performance management in hybrid organisations: A study in social housing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 533-545.
    5. Arnold, Denis G. & Audi, Robert & Zwolinski, Matt, 2010. "Recent Work in Ethical Theory and Its Implications for Business Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 559-581, October.
    6. Brown, Judy & Dillard, Jesse, 2013. "Critical accounting and communicative action: On the limits of consensual deliberation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 176-190.
    7. Campanale, Cristina & Cinquini, Lino & Grossi, Giuseppe, 2021. "The role of multiple values in developing management accounting practices in hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    8. Lode De Waele & Tobias Polzer & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Liselore Berghman, 2021. "“A little bit of everything?” Conceptualising performance measurement in hybrid public sector organisations through a literature review," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 343-363, March.
    9. Buchholz, Rogene A. & Rosenthal, Sandra B., 1996. "Toward a New Understanding of Moral Pluralism," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 263-275, July.
    10. Alessandro Giosi & Marco Caiffa, 2020. "Political connections, media impact and state-owned enterprises: an empirical analysis on corporate financial performance," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 261-288, October.
    11. Hyndman, Noel & McConville, Danielle, 2018. "Trust and accountability in UK charities: Exploring the virtuous circle," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 227-237.
    12. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    13. Jan Bebbington & Judy Brown & Bob Frame & Ian Thomson, 2007. "Theorizing engagement: the potential of a critical dialogic approach," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 356-381, June.
    14. Boland Jr., Richard J. & Sharma, Arun K. & Afonso, Paulo Sérgio, 2008. "Designing management control in hybrid organizations: The role of path creation and morphogenesis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(7-8), pages 899-914.
    15. Jarmo Vakkuri & Jan-Erik Johanson & Nancy Chun Feng & Filippo Giordano, 2021. "Governance and accountability in hybrid organizations – past, present and future," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 245-260, March.
    16. Burchell, Stuart & Clubb, Colin & Hopwood, Anthony & Hughes, John & Nahapiet, Janine, 1980. "The roles of accounting in organizations and society," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 5-27, January.
    17. Jesse Dillard & Judy Brown, 2012. "Agonistic Pluralism and Imagining CSEAR into the Future," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3-16, April.
    18. Stewart Smyth, 2017. "Public accountability: reforms and resistance in social housing," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 212-231, February.
    19. Joshua Maine & Emilia Florin Samuelsson & Timur Uman, 2021. "Ambidextrous sustainability, organisational structure and performance in hybrid organisations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 35(3), pages 734-769, June.
    20. Lars Sunding & Per Odenrick, 2010. "A method for action research interventions to improve joint problem solving in operational teams in the Swedish construction industry," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(1), pages 97-123, April.
    21. Tobias Alexander Krause & Martyna Daria Swiatczak, 2020. "In control we trust!? Exploring formal control configurations for municipally owned corporations," Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 314-342, August.
    22. Erin I. Castellas & Wendy Stubbs & Véronique Ambrosini, 2019. "Responding to Value Pluralism in Hybrid Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 635-650, October.
    23. Teemu Laine & Tuomas Korhonen & Petri Suomala & Asta Rantamaa, 2016. "Boundary subjects and boundary objects in accounting fact construction and communication," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 303-329, August.
    24. Jarmo Vakkuri & Jan-Erik Johanson, 2018. "Debate: Taming the monster— understanding hybrid organizations and governance," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 162-163, April.
    25. Fischer, Michael Daniel & Ferlie, Ewan, 2013. "Resisting hybridisation between modes of clinical risk management: Contradiction, contest, and the production of intractable conflict," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 30-49.
    26. Alex Nicholls & Benjamin Huybrechts, 2016. "Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 699-714, June.
    27. Briers, Michael & Chua, Wai Fong, 2001. "The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 237-269, April.
    28. Teemu Laine & Tuomas Korhonen & Petri Suomala & Asta Rantamaa, 2016. "Boundary subjects and boundary objects in accounting fact construction and communication," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 303-329, August.
    29. Abdullah, Aminah & Khadaroo, Iqbal & Napier, Christopher J., 2018. "Managing the performance of arts organisations: Pursuing heterogeneous objectives in an era of austerity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 174-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grossi, Giuseppe & Laguecir, Aziza & Ferry, Laurence & Tucker, Basil, 2024. "Accounting and accountability for managing diversity tensions in hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grossi, Giuseppe & Laguecir, Aziza & Ferry, Laurence & Tucker, Basil, 2024. "Accounting and accountability for managing diversity tensions in hybrid organisations," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    2. Spanò, Rosanna & Grossi, Giuseppe & Landi, Giovanni Catello, 2022. "Academic entrepreneurial hybrids: Accounting and accountability in the case of MegaRide," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    3. Maran, Laura & Bigoni, Michele & Morrison, Leanne, 2023. "Shedding light on alternative interdisciplinary accounting research through journal editors’ perspectives and an analysis of recent publications," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    4. Baud, Céline & Lallemand-Stempak, Nathalie, 2024. "Quantitative technologies and reflexivity: The role of tools and their layouts in the case of credit risk management," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Tuomas Korhonen & Virpi Sillanpää & Aki Jääskeläinen, 2023. "Anchor practices that guide horizontal performance measurement: an interventionist case study of the financial aspect of new technology implementation in healthcare," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 787-816, September.
    6. Janni Grouleff Nielsen & Rainer Lueg & Dennis van Liempd, 2019. "Managing Multiple Logics: The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Thomson, Ian & Grubnic, Suzana & Georgakopoulos, Georgios, 2014. "Exploring accounting-sustainability hybridisation in the UK public sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 453-476.
    8. Sargiacomo, Massimo & Corazza, Laura & D'Andreamatteo, Antonio & Torchia, Daniel, 2024. "Megaprojects and hybridity. Accounting and performance challenges for multiple diverse actors and values," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    9. Dillard, Jesse & Shivji, Alysha & Bianchi, Lara, 2024. "Rights-based, worker-driven accountability in the fields: Contesting the uncontested contestable," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Palermo, Tommaso, 2017. "The dynamics of (dis)integrated risk management: a comparative field study," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Dorthe Windeck & Jürgen Weber & Erik Strauss, 2015. "Enrolling managers to accept the business partner: the role of boundary objects," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(3), pages 617-653, August.
    12. Bénet, Nathalie & Deville, Aude & Ventolini, Séverine, 2024. "When a financially oriented performance measurement system supports hybrid collective sensemaking: The case of a cooperative bank," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    13. Kastberg Weichselberger, Gustaf & Fırtın, Cemil Eren & Bracci, Enrico, 2024. "Hybridisation, purification, and re-hybridisation: A study of shifting registers of value," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(5).
    14. Tasneem Sadiq & Rob van Tulder & Karen Maas, 2022. "Building a Taxonomy of Hybridization: An Institutional Logics Perspective on Societal Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    15. O’Leary, Susan & Smith, David, 2020. "Moments of resistance: An internally persuasive view of performance and impact reports in non-governmental organizations," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Chua, Wai Fong, 2007. "Accounting, measuring, reporting and strategizing - Re-using verbs: A review essay," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 487-494.
    17. Saravanamuthu, Kala & Lehman, Cheryl, 2013. "Enhancing stakeholder interaction through environmental risk accounts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 410-437.
    18. Anne Pezet & Jérémy Morales, 2010. "Les contrôleurs de gestion, « médiateurs » de la financiarisation," Post-Print halshs-00498673, HAL.
    19. Yves Gendron & Laura F. Spira, 2009. "What Went Wrong? The Downfall of Arthur Andersen and the Construction of Controllability Boundaries Surrounding Financial Auditing," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 987-1027, December.
    20. Boedker, Christina & Chong, Kar-Ming & Mouritsen, Jan, 2020. "The counter-performativity of calculative practices: Mobilising rankings of intellectual capital," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:bracre:v:56:y:2024:i:5:s089083892300135x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-british-accounting-review .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.