IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02659906.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La gestion au prisme de ses instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Franck Aggeri

    (CGS i3 - Centre de Gestion Scientifique i3 - Mines Paris - PSL (École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris) - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - I3 - Institut interdisciplinaire de l’innovation - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Julie Labatut

    (AGIR - AGroécologie, Innovations, teRritoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Toulouse INP - Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) - UT - Université de Toulouse)

Abstract

L'intérêt pour les approches par les instruments connaît aujourd'hui un renouveau qu'il est difficile d'ignorer. Par ce terme, nous désignons les travaux qui proposent d'étudier l'action organisée et stratégique, non pas à travers sa substance, ses discours ou les intentions des managers, mais à travers les instrumentations, techniques, scientifiques ou gestionnaires qui sont mises en place pour conduire l'action collective et produire de nouvelles capacités. Etudier l'action organisée à travers son instrumentation ne constitue pas une nouveauté. Ces approches s'inscrivent dans une longue tradition de recherche qui, selon différentes perspectives, a investi cette problématique pour comprendre le foisonnement des instruments et des technologies dans les entreprises à partir de la moitié du XXe siècle et leurs effets sur la dynamique des organisations. Ainsi nous proposons d'analyser les problématiques, les fondements et les apports de ces multiples travaux, au travers d'une approche généalogique nous permettant de replacer ces travaux dans les contextes à la fois théoriques et pratiques dans lesquels ils ont émergé. A partir des années 1960, apparaissent des travaux qui trouvent leur origine au croisement de deux cultures : la modélisation et l'étude des organisations (behaviorisme, approche foucaldienne des organisations). Dans ces premiers travaux, les approches par les instruments visent à expliquer la stabilité des comportements organisationnels. La question de la transformation conjointe des instruments et des organisations apparaît dans les années 90. Nous analysons ici trois approches contemporaines ayant investi cette problématique : l'étude des vagues de rationalisation et des techniques managériales ; l'instrumentation située ; les routines organisationnelles et la « sociomatérialité ». Nous mettons en perspectives ces différents travaux afin d'en expliquer les convergences et les divergences, et d'en proposer une discussion critique. Nous terminons en proposant un agenda de recherche sur une approche du management stratégique par les instruments autour de deux pistes : la conception d'instruments dans une conception de l'agir stratégique et l'articulation de différentes formes d'instrumentation au sein de dispositifs stratégiques cohérents.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2010. "La gestion au prisme de ses instruments," Post-Print hal-02659906, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02659906
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02659906v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02659906v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Berry, 1983. "Une technologie invisible - L'impact des instruments de gestion sur l'évolution des systèmes humains," Post-Print hal-00263141, HAL.
    2. Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil & Armand Hatchuel, 2006. "Les processus d'innovation," Post-Print hal-00830210, HAL.
    3. Bernard Colasse, 2005. "La comptabilité comme "technique qui permet de voir"," Post-Print halshs-00153504, HAL.
    4. Scott D. N. Cook & John Seely Brown, 1999. "Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 381-400, August.
    5. Maurizio Zollo & Sidney G. Winter, 2002. "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 339-351, June.
    6. Aurélien Acquier & Franck Aggeri, 2007. "The Development of a CSR Industry: Legitimacy and Feasibility as the Two Pillars of the Institutionalization Process," Post-Print hal-01745137, HAL.
    7. Franck Aggeri & Pascal Le Masson & Anne Branciard & Catherine Paradeise & Ashveen Peerbaye, 2007. "Les plates-formes technologiques dans les sciences de la vie : politiques publiques, organisations et performances," Post-Print hal-00871357, HAL.
    8. Miller, Peter & O'Leary, Ted, 2007. "Mediating instruments and making markets: Capital budgeting, science and the economy," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(7-8), pages 701-734.
    9. Oliver E. Williamson, 1999. "Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(12), pages 1087-1108, December.
    10. Martha S. Feldman, 2000. "Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(6), pages 611-629, December.
    11. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    12. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/12567 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Aurélien Acquier & Franck Aggeri, 2007. "The development of a CSR industry: legitimacy and feasibility as the two pillars of the institutionalization process," Post-Print hal-01117319, HAL.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/979 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Franck Aggeri & Pascal Le Masson & Anne Branciard & Catherine Paradeise & Ashveen Peerbaye, 2007. "Les plates-formes technologiques dans les sciences de la vie. Politiques publiques, organisations et performances," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 2-2.
    17. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9674 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1992. "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(3), pages 398-427, August.
    19. Power, Michael, 1996. "Making things auditable," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(2-3), pages 289-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2010. "La gestion au prisme de ses instruments. Une analyse généalogique des approches théoriques fondées sur les instruments de gestion," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(3), pages 5-37., September.
    2. Anja Schulze & Stefano Brusoni, 2022. "How dynamic capabilities change ordinary capabilities: Reconnecting attention control and problem‐solving," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2447-2477, December.
    3. Feim M. Blakçori, 2014. "The Role of Formal Routines in Organizational Innovation," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(2), pages 56-70, February.
    4. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    5. Matthijs Janssen & Carolina Castaldi & Alexander Alexiev, 2014. "Dynamic capabilities for service innovation: conceptualization and measurement," Working Papers 14-07, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Mar 2014.
    6. Giovanni. Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2004. "50th Anniversay Article: The Strategy Field from the Perspective of Management Science: Divergent Strands and Possible Integration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(10), pages 1309-1318, October.
    7. Molden, Lars Hovdan & Clausen, Tommy Hoyvarde, 2021. "Playing 3D chess, or how firms can thrive under complexity: The mediating role of innovation capabilities in the use of innovation input," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Wolfgang H. Güttel & Stefan Konlechner & Barbara Müller, 2012. "Entscheidungsmuster und Veränderungsarchitekturen in Wandelprozessen: Eine Dynamic Capabilities-Perspektive," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 64(6), pages 630-654, September.
    9. Hwan Jin Kim, 2018. "Reconciling Entrepreneurial Orientation and Dynamic Capabilities: A Strategic Entrepreneurship Perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 27(2), pages 180-208, September.
    10. Richard Arend, 2014. "Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’ relationship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 33-57, January.
    11. Maree Storer & Paul Hyland, 2011. "Utilizing Industry-led Innovation Capacity to Enhance Supply Chain Performance : An Empirical Study," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 5(6), pages 1-55, December.
    12. Carlo Salvato, 2009. "Capabilities Unveiled: The Role of Ordinary Activities in the Evolution of Product Development Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 384-409, April.
    13. Koufteros, Xenophon & Lu, Guanyi & Peters, Richard C. & Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2014. "Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 83-97.
    14. Lee, Po-Yen & Lin, Hui-Tzu & Chen, Hung-Hsin & Shyr, Yi-Hwan, 2011. "Dynamic capabilities exploitation of market and hierarchy governance structures: An empirical comparison of Taiwan and South Korea," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 359-370, July.
    15. Jose Arias-Pérez & Geovanny Perdomo-Charry & Carlos Castaño-Ríos, 2017. "Not-Invented-Here Syndrome And Innovation Performance: The Confounding Effect Of Innovation Capabilities As Organisational Routines In Service Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(01), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Arie Y. Lewin & Silvia Massini & Carine Peeters, 2011. "Microfoundations of Internal and External Absorptive Capacity Routines," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 81-98, February.
    17. Cepeda, Gabriel & Vera, Dusya, 2007. "Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 426-437, May.
    18. Koen H. Heimeriks & Geert Duysters, 2007. "Alliance Capability as a Mediator Between Experience and Alliance Performance: An Empirical Investigation into the Alliance Capability Development Process," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 25-49, January.
    19. Daniel A. Levinthal & Alessandro Marino, 2015. "Three Facets of Organizational Adaptation: Selection, Variety, and Plasticity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 743-755, June.
    20. Pitelis, Christos & Teece, David, 2009. "The (new) nature and essence of the firm," MPRA Paper 24317, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02659906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.