IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02554288.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The "merchantable gratuitousness" platforms and the Free Digital Labor controversy: a new form of exploitation?
[Les plateformes de la gratuité marchande et la controverse autour du Free Digital Labor : une nouvelle forme d’exploitation ?]

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Vercellone

    (CEMTI - Centre d'études sur les médias, les technologies et l'internationalisation - UP8 - Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis)

Abstract

Cognitive capitalism and the informational revolution have gone hand in hand with a blurring of the boundaries between work and leisure time. At the heart of this evolution is the rise of platform capitalism, and in particular the "merchantable gratuitousness" platforms, like Google and Facebook, which have now taken first place in the ranking of world firms in terms of stock market capitalisation and profitability. Their profit model is based on the logic of multi-sided markets and combines the sale of online advertising and the extraction of user data. The users thus represent both the product and the producers of the main raw material underlying the organisation of the advertising market for merchantable gratuitousness platforms. This is called Free Digital Labor. This concept refers to the activity, apparently both gratuitous and self-governing, performed, often unknowingly, by a multitude of individuals on the internet for the benefit of big internet oligopolies and data industries. The Free Digital Labor thesis is highly controversial. It is often rejected by means of three main arguments: 1. it would be, not labor, but the intangible capital of the algorithm which, through an automated process, would extract and create most of the value; 2. the Free Digital Labor would escape not only the canonical criteria of wage labor, but also the anthropological definition of labor as a conscious and voluntary goal-oriented activity; 3. the free services proposed by the platforms would be remuneration in kind, excluding any relationship of exploitation. Our contribution aims to clarify the terms of this debate and to respond to these objections through a historical and theoretical analysis of the changes in the capital-labor relationship that occurred under the aegis of platform capitalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Vercellone, 2020. "The "merchantable gratuitousness" platforms and the Free Digital Labor controversy: a new form of exploitation? [Les plateformes de la gratuité marchande et la controverse autour du Free ," Post-Print hal-02554288, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02554288
    DOI: 10.21494/ISTE.OP.2020.0502
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02554288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02554288/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.21494/ISTE.OP.2020.0502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Askenazy, 2016. "Tous rentiers ! Pour une autre répartition des richesses," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02923130, HAL.
    2. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2003. "Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets," Journal of the European Economic Association, MIT Press, vol. 1(4), pages 990-1029, June.
    3. Carlo Vercellone, 2007. "La nouvelle articulation salaire, profit, rente dans le capitalisme cognitif," Post-Print halshs-00263830, HAL.
    4. Carlo Vercellone & Francesco Brancaccio & Alfonso Giuliani & Federico Puletti & Giulia Rocchi & Pierluigi Vattimo, 2018. "Data-driven disruptive commons-based models," Working Papers halshs-01952141, HAL.
    5. Jean-Charles Rochet & Jean Tirole, 2002. "Cooperation Among Competitors: Some Economics Of Payment Card Associations," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(4), pages 549-570, Winter.
    6. Carlo Vercellone, 2007. "La nouvelle articulation salaire, profit, rente dans le capitalisme cognitif," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00263830, HAL.
    7. Carlo Vercellone & Francesco Brancaccio & Alfonso Giuliani & Federico Puletti & Giulia Rocchi & Pierluigi Vattimo, 2018. "Data-driven disruptive commons-based models," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01952141, HAL.
    8. Vercellone, Carlo, 2007. "La nouvelle articulation salaire, profit, rente dans le capitalisme cognitif," European Journal of Economic and Social Systems, Lavoisier, vol. 20(1), pages 45-64.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlo Vercellone, 2013. "Capitalisme cognitif et revenu social garanti comme revenu primaire," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00975286, HAL.
    2. Carlo Vercellone, 2013. "Capitalisme cognitif et revenu social garanti comme revenu primaire," Post-Print halshs-00975286, HAL.
    3. Chakravorti Sujit, 2003. "Theory of Credit Card Networks: A Survey of the Literature," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Wilko Bolt, 2012. "Retail Payment Systems: Competition, Innovation, and Implications," DNB Working Papers 362, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    5. Simon Loertscher, 2008. "Market Making Oligopoly," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 263-289, June.
    6. David S. Evans & Richard Schmalensee, 2005. "The economics of interchange fees and their regulation : an overview," Proceedings – Payments System Research Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, issue May, pages 73-120.
    7. ?zlem Bedre-Defolie & Emilio Calvano, 2013. "Pricing Payment Cards," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(3), pages 206-231, August.
    8. Creti, Anna & Verdier, Marianne, 2014. "Fraud, investments and liability regimes in payment platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 84-93.
    9. Edmond Baranes & Thomas Cortade & Andreea Cosnita-Langlais, 2014. "Merger control on two-sided markets: is there need for an efficinecy defense?," Working Papers 14-12, NET Institute.
    10. Doh-Shin Jeon & Nikrooz Nasr, 2016. "News Aggregators and Competition among Newspapers on the Internet," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 8(4), pages 91-114, November.
    11. Economides, Nicholas & Henriques, David, 2011. "To surcharge or not to surcharge? A two-sided market perspective of the no-surchage rule," Working Paper Series 1388, European Central Bank.
    12. Ivaldi, Marc & Sokullu, Senay & Toru, Tuba, 2015. "Airport Prices in a Two-Sided Market Setting: Major US Airports," CEPR Discussion Papers 10658, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Aurazo Jose & Vasquez Jose, 2019. "Merchant Card Acceptance: An Extension of the Tourist Test for Developing Countries," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(2), pages 109-139, June.
    14. Oliver Budzinski & Annika Stöhr, 2019. "Competition policy reform in Europe and Germany – institutional change in the light of digitization," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 15-54, January.
    15. Jonker Nicole, 2011. "Card Acceptance and Surcharging: the Role of Costs and Competition," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(2), pages 1-35, June.
    16. repec:vuw:vuwscr:19087 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jean-Charles Rochet, 2007. "Some economics of horizontal integration in the payments industry," Proceedings – Payments System Research Conferences, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    18. Filistrucchi, L. & Gerardin, D. & van Damme, E.E.C. & Keunen, S. & Klein, T.J. & Michielsen, T.O. & Wileur, J., 2010. "Mergers in Two-Sided Markets - A Report to the NMa," Other publications TiSEM f901d1fe-8878-444e-a685-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Tanjim Hossain & Dylan Minor & John Morgan, 2011. "Competing Matchmakers: An Experimental Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(11), pages 1913-1925, November.
    20. Budzinski, Oliver, 2016. "Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Wettbewerbspolitik durch Marktplätze im Internet," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 103, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    21. Lapo Filistrucchi & Damien Geradin & Eric van Damme, 2012. "Identifying Two-Sided Markets," Working Papers - Economics wp2012_01.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Algorithmes; données; Karl Marx KEYWORDS cognitive capitalism; Free Digital Labor; marches multi-versants; multi-sided markets; data; Algorithms; Free Digital Labour; Karl Marx; MOTS-CLES capitalisme cognitif; capitalisme des plateformes; platform capitalism;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02554288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.