IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02121048.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative analysis of company performance evaluation methods

Author

Listed:
  • Judita Narkunienė

    (Vilnius University [Vilnius])

  • Aurelija Ulbinaitė

    (Vilnius University [Vilnius])

Abstract

The evaluation of a company's performance is an integral part of the management of every company, which allows determining the impact of business management decisions on the performance results, as well as the direction of the results and the decisions that need to be made to improve them. Traditionally, a company's performance is evaluated on the basis of an analysis of financial performance indicators, but it is noted that in today's dynamic business environment the timely control of the performance is crucial, thus, there is an increasing attention on non-financial performance indicators. The aim of the article is to investigate and compare the modern methods for company performance evaluation that are based on the analysis of financial and non-financial performance indicators. The research is carried out using systematic analysis of scientific literature, comparison, and aggregation methods. First of all, the article unfolds the essence of the concept of the company performance evaluation and highlights the differences between traditional and modern performance evaluation systems. Moreover, the advantages of non-financial performance indicators are compared with financial indicators. Furthermore, a classification scheme for performance evaluation methods is provided; by identifying their main advantages and disadvantages the most popular and widely used modern performance evaluation methods are overviewed: economic value added method, balanced scorecard, performance prism, performance pyramid, six-sigma model and multi-criteria company performance evaluation method. Finally, according to certain criteria, a comparative analysis of the latter methods is performed. The comparative analysis confirms that non-financial performance indicators complement financial indicators; therefore, in the process of a company's performance evaluation, modern performance evaluation methods, combining financial and non-financial performance indicators and allowing the performance to be evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively, should be used. However, there is no single method that would be appropriate for all companies, so further work can be targeted at establishing a multi-criteria performance evaluation method that would satisfy the needs of a particular business' activity and targets for evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Judita Narkunienė & Aurelija Ulbinaitė, 2018. "Comparative analysis of company performance evaluation methods," Post-Print hal-02121048, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02121048
    DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(10)
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02121048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02121048/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(10)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdel-Maksoud, Ahmed & Dugdale, David & Luther, Robert, 2005. "Non-financial performance measurement in manufacturing companies," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 261-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anh Ngoc Mai & Huong Van Vu & Bien Xuan Bui & Tuyen Quang Tran, 2019. "The lasting effects of innovation on firm profitability: panel evidence from a transitional economy," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(1), pages 3417-3436, January.
    2. Mihaela Brîndușa TUDOSE & Silvia AVASILCĂI & Radu GOLBAN, 2019. "Assessing Financial Performance Of Companies Manufacturing Industrial Goods. Evidence On Performance Dynamics In The Period Before And After The Crisis," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6, pages 335-354.
    3. Sigit Hermawan & Nisfatur Rokhmania & Ruci Arizanda Rahayu & Iffah Qonitah & Ratna Nugraheni, 2021. "Financial performance mediates the relationship of intellectual capital to firm value in Indonesian banking companies," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 181-188, September.
    4. Bienvenido S. Cortes & Zhengyao Ooi, 2023. "Cultural Intelligence, Firm Capabilities, and Performance: The Case of German Subsidiaries in Malaysia," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed Abdel‐Maksoud & Wagdy Abdallah & Mayada Youssef, 2012. "An empirical study of the influence of intensity of competition on the deployment of contemporary management accounting practices and managerial techniques in Egyptian firms," Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(2), pages 84-97, February.
    2. Dr Emmanuel Mitaire Tarurhor & Dr Ochuko B. Emudainohwo, 2020. "LEAN Manufacturing and Firm Performance in the Palm-Oil Industries in Delta State, Nigeria," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 319-331.
    3. Abreu-Ledón, René & Luján-García, Darkys E. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Escobar-Pérez, Bernabé, 2018. "A meta-analytic study of the impact of Lean Production on business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 83-102.
    4. Lau, Chong M. & Roopnarain, Ketvi, 2014. "The effects of nonfinancial and financial measures on employee motivation to participate in target setting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 228-247.
    5. Laith Walid Fatafta & Shaker Habis Nawafleh & Heba Eid Al Darwaish, 2019. "Reviewing the Mediating Role of Quality Management Capabilities on the Effect of Information Technology on Organizational Performance," Journal of Business & Management (COES&RJ-JBM), , vol. 7(3), pages 234-251, July.
    6. Mohammad Mazharul Islam & Essam Habes & Azharul Karim & Syed Omar bin Syed Agil, 2016. "Quality certification and company performance – the newly developed country experience," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 628-644, July.
    7. Nayan Mitra, 2021. "Impact of strategic management, corporate social responsibility on firm performance in the post mandate period: evidence from India," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Vincent K. Chong & Lokman Mia & John Sands & Zhichao Alex Wang, 2023. "The effect of nonfinancial performance measures, absorptive capacity, and organizational learning on innovation performance," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 201-233, June.
    9. Unnisa, Syeda Azeem & Hassanpour, Malek, 2017. "Development circumstances of four recycling industries (used motor oil, acidic sludge, plastic wastes and blown bitumen) in the world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 605-624.
    10. Kamilah Ahmad, 2017. "The Implementation of Management Accounting Practices and its Relationship with Performance in Small and Medium Enterprises," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 342-353.
    11. Judita Narkunienė & Aurelija Ulbinaitė, 2018. "Comparative analysis of company performance evaluation methods," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(1), pages 125-138, September.
    12. Ionel Bostan & Alic Bîrcă & Aliona Bîrcă & Christiana Brigitte Sandu, 2022. "Global Top E-Commerce Companies: Transparency Analysis Based on Annual Reports," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Determinants of successful adoption of the Balanced Scorecard in Vietnamese small and medium-sized enterprises," OSF Preprints 5hx2r, Center for Open Science.
    14. Eva Erjavec, 2023. "Going digital and intangible: intangible investments effects on a company’s success," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 3, pages 275-294.
    15. Abdel-Kader, Magdy & Luther, Robert, 2008. "The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 2-27.
    16. Nayan Mitra & Asif Akhtar & Ananda Das Gupta, 2018. "Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility in the post mandate period: Evidence from India," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Leyla MAHMUDOVA & Judit KATONÁNÉ KOVÁCS, 2018. "Definitining The Performance Of Small And Medium Enterprises," Network Intelligence Studies, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 12, pages 111-120, December.
    18. Weetman, Pauline, 2006. "Discovering the ‘international’ in accounting and finance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 351-370.
    19. Lau, Chong M. & Martin-Sardesai, Ann V., 2012. "The role of organisational concern for workplace fairness in the choice of a performance measurement system," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 157-172.
    20. Md. Mazharul Islam & Abalala Turki & Md. Wahid Murad & Azharul Karim, 2017. "Do Sustainable Procurement Practices Improve Organizational Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02121048. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.