IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01885825.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'Acceptation De L'Innovation Dans Le Secteur Vegetal : Une Etude Qualitative Exploratoire

Author

Listed:
  • Gaëlle Pantin-Sohier

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

  • François Pantin

    (GAINS - ARGUMANS - Atelier De Recherche En Gestion De L'université Du Mans - GAINS - Groupe d'Analyse des Itinéraires et des Niveaux Salariaux - UM - Le Mans Université)

  • Alice Sohier

    (NIMEC - Normandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

  • Rania Serhal

    (GRANEM - Groupe de Recherche Angevin en Economie et Management - UA - Université d'Angers - AGROCAMPUS OUEST - Institut National de l'Horticulture et du Paysage)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to analyse the perception and the acceptation of innovative products in the horticultural sector. An exploratory study carried out using a focus group leading to 40 individual interviews and 4 expert interviews shows the conceptualised innovative perspectives concerning the intrinsic characteristics (such as colour) as well as the extrinsic characteristics (such as packaging). The results show 1) the difficulty of accepting horticultural modifications because of the specificities involved but also because of the behaviour of the consumer as a reaction to the change and 2) an authorisation for the innovation of the packaging if a valorisation of the horticultural product, respect of the products natural state and an easier categorisation is obtained.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaëlle Pantin-Sohier & François Pantin & Alice Sohier & Rania Serhal, 2012. "L'Acceptation De L'Innovation Dans Le Secteur Vegetal : Une Etude Qualitative Exploratoire," Post-Print hal-01885825, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01885825
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01885825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01885825/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belk, Russell W, 1988. "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(2), pages 139-168, September.
    2. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    3. John Hauser & Gerard J. Tellis & Abbie Griffin, 2006. "Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 687-717, 11-12.
    4. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1992. "The Role of Optimum Stimulation Level in Exploratory Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(3), pages 434-448, December.
    5. Heckler, Susan E & Childers, Terry L, 1992. "The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, March.
    6. Garbarino, Ellen C & Edell, Julie A, 1997. "Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(2), pages 147-158, September.
    7. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    8. van Trijp, Hans C M & Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M, 1992. "Consumers' Variety Seeking Tendency with Respect to Foods: Measurement and Managerial Implications," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 181-195.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaelle Pantin-Sohier & François Pantin & Alice Sohier & Laure Jacquemier & Rania Serhal, 2018. "Comprendre les conditions d’acceptation de l’innovation dans le secteur végétal," Post-Print hal-03224072, HAL.
    2. Heidenreich, Sven & Kraemer, Tobias, 2015. "Passive innovation resistance: The curse of innovation? Investigating consequences for innovative consumer behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 134-151.
    3. Caroline Lancelot Miltgen & Gaelle Pantin-Sohier & Bianca Grohmann, 2016. "Communicating Sensory Attributes and Innovation Through Food Product Labeling," Post-Print hal-01247599, HAL.
    4. Bartels, Jos & Reinders, Machiel J., 2011. "Consumer innovativeness and its correlates: A propositional inventory for future research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 601-609, June.
    5. Möller, Jana & Herm, Steffen, 2013. "Shaping Retail Brand Personality Perceptions by Bodily Experiences," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(4), pages 438-446.
    6. F. Magnoni & Elyette Roux, 2011. "Stretching a luxury brand down: An experimental study of core brand dilution effects," Post-Print halshs-00644899, HAL.
    7. Eunkyung Lee & Yeosun Yoon, 2022. "Heading Up or Stuck Down Here? The Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility on Subjective Social Status and Brand Identification," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    8. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    9. Ewing, Michael T. & Jevons, Colin P. & Khalil, Elias L., 2009. "Brand death: A developmental model of senescence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 332-338, March.
    10. Megehee, Carol M. & Spake, Deborah F., 2012. "Consumer enactments of archetypes using luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 1434-1442.
    11. Anwar Sadat Shimul, 2022. "Brand attachment: a review and future research," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(4), pages 400-419, July.
    12. Wang, Yajin, 2022. "A conceptual framework of contemporary luxury consumption," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 788-803.
    13. Jacob, Isaac & Khanna, Monica & Rai, Krupa A., 2020. "Attribution analysis of luxury brands: An investigation into consumer-brand congruence through conspicuous consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 597-607.
    14. Sahay, Arvind, 2013. "A Customer Oriented Approach To Identifying Competitive Advantage," IIMA Working Papers WP2013-05-08, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Lucy Gill-Simmen & Deborah J. MacInnis & Andreas B. Eisingerich & C. Whan Park, 2018. "Brand-self connections and brand prominence as drivers of employee brand attachment," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 128-146, December.
    16. François Lenglet, 2018. "FNS or the Varseek-scale? Proposals for a valid operationalization of neophilia," Post-Print halshs-02402036, HAL.
    17. Lee, Kuo-Wei & Li, Chia-Ying, 2023. "It is not merely a chat: Transforming chatbot affordances into dual identification and loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Roggeveen, Anne L. & Grewal, Dhruv & Karsberg, John & Noble, Stephanie M. & Nordfält, Jens & Patrick, Vanessa M. & Schweiger, Elisa & Soysal, Gonca & Dillard, Annemarie & Cooper, Nora & Olson, Richard, 2021. "Forging meaningful consumer-brand relationships through creative merchandise offerings and innovative merchandising strategies," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 81-98.
    19. Anwar Sadat Shimul & Ian Phau & Michael Lwin, 2019. "Conceptualising luxury brand attachment: scale development and validation," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(6), pages 675-690, November.
    20. Chao, Chih-Wei & Reid, Mike & Mavondo, Felix T., 2012. "Consumer innovativeness influence on really new product adoption," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 211-217.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01885825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.