IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01655014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les échecs du crowdlending, une étude exploratoire

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Duran

    (IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - UR - Université de La Réunion)

  • Christel Dubrulle

    (IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - UR - Université de La Réunion)

Abstract

Les échecs en crowdlending : une étude exploratoire. Résumé : Cette communication se focalise sur la branche du prêt avec intérêts, le crowdlending. Le crowdlending est une source alternative de financement pour les TPE PME principalement, qui leur permet de contracter des prêts, sans faire appel aux intermédiaires financiers classiques, mais grâce aux multiples contributions de la foule. La foule regroupant des profils hétérogènes, elle comprend tout un ensemble d'investisseurs non experts ce qui interroge sur l'intelligence collective. Ce collectif dépend essentiellement des choix de la plateforme et de ses critères de sélections puisque les analystes ouvrent la première porte (virtuelle) aux entreprises. Mais ensuite, un choix tout aussi difficile doit être fait par les prêteurs. A qui faire confiance ? comment faire sa sélection pour optimiser le rendement de son épargne ? et si la foule ne faisait pas les bons choix. Cette communication se propose d'étudier les cas d'échecs du crowdlending au travers d'une étude de cas exploratoire : l'étude de la plateforme Lendopolis. Nous allions entretiens semi-directifs, netnographie et traitement quantitatif sur SPSS. Nos premiers résultats concluent à la « non intelligence » collective de la communauté de prêt. Les échecs sont collectifs et des solutions doivent être rapidement mis en place par la communauté de prêt afin d'enrichir ce processus et de favoriser sa pérennité.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Duran & Christel Dubrulle, 2017. "Les échecs du crowdlending, une étude exploratoire," Post-Print hal-01655014, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01655014
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01655014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01655014/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sylvie Cieply & Anne-Laure Le Nadant, 2016. "Le crowdfunding : modèle alternatif de financement ou généralisation du modèle de marché pour les start-up et les PME ?," Revue d'économie financière, Association d'économie financière, vol. 0(2), pages 255-272.
    2. Denis Frydrych & Adam J. Bock & Tony Kinder & Benjamin Koeck, 2014. "Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding," Venture Capital, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 247-269, July.
    3. Kshetri, Nir, 2015. "Success of Crowd-based Online Technology in Fundraising: An Institutional Perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 100-116.
    4. Thomas H. Allison & Blakley C. Davis & Jeremy C. Short & Justin W. Webb, 2015. "Crowdfunding in a Prosocial Microlending Environment: Examining the Role of Intrinsic versus Extrinsic Cues," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 53-73, January.
    5. Stéphane Onnee & Sophie Renault, 2013. "Le financement participatif : atouts, risques et conditions de succès," Post-Print hal-01712695, HAL.
    6. Magdalena Cholakova & Bart Clarysse, 2015. "Does the Possibility to Make Equity Investments in Crowdfunding Projects Crowd Out Reward–Based Investments?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(1), pages 145-172, January.
    7. BELLEFLAMME, Paul & LAMBERT, Thomas & SCHWIENBACHER, Armin, 2011. "Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2011032, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    8. Rahma Chekkar, 2005. "Communication Financiere Et Analyse De Discours. Une Reflexion Methodologique Autour Du Cas Saint-Gobain," Post-Print halshs-00581152, HAL.
    9. Éric Cauvin & Christel Decock Good & Pierre-Laurent Bescos, 2006. "La perception des entreprises françaises en matière de diffusion d'informations non financières : une enquête par questionnaire," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 12(2), pages 117-142.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie Duran, 2016. "Le crowdlending : une opportunité de mission originale pour l'expert-comptable ?," Post-Print hal-01900572, HAL.
    2. Nathalie Duran, 2016. "Le crowdlending, une opportunité de mission originale pour l'expert comptable ?," Post-Print hal-01651395, HAL.
    3. Nathalie Duran, 2016. "Crowdlending : les échanges sociaux dans les communautés de prêt," Post-Print hal-01651380, HAL.
    4. Tanja Jovanović, 2019. "Crowdfunding: What Do We Know So Far?," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Kazem Mochkabadi & Christine K. Volkmann, 2020. "Equity crowdfunding: a systematic review of the literature," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 75-118, January.
    6. Fang, Xing, 2022. "Why we hide good deeds? The selfless and anonymous donation behavior in crowdfunding," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Allison, Thomas H. & Davis, Blakley C. & Webb, Justin W. & Short, Jeremy C., 2017. "Persuasion in crowdfunding: An elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 707-725.
    8. Friedemann Polzin & Helen Toxopeus & Erik Stam, 2018. "The wisdom of the crowd in funding: information heterogeneity and social networks of crowdfunders," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 251-273, February.
    9. Felipe, Israel José dos Santos & Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley & Leal, Cristiana Cerqueira & Braun Santos, Danilo, 2022. "Reward crowdfunding campaigns: Time-to-success analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 214-228.
    10. Bagheri, Afsaneh & Chitsazan, Hasti & Ebrahimi, Ashkan, 2019. "Crowdfunding motivations: A focus on donors' perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 218-232.
    11. Aurélien Petit & Peter Wirtz, 2022. "Experts in the crowd and their influence on herding in reward-based crowdfunding of cultural projects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 419-449, January.
    12. Scheaf, David J. & Davis, Blakley C. & Webb, Justin W. & Coombs, Joseph E. & Borns, Jared & Holloway, Garrett, 2018. "Signals' flexibility and interaction with visual cues: Insights from crowdfunding," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 720-741.
    13. W. Cai & F.H.J. Polzin & F.C. Stam, 2019. "Crowdfunding and Social Capital: A Systematic Literature Review," Working Papers 19-05, Utrecht School of Economics.
    14. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    15. Veronica Crescenzo & Angelo Bonfanti & Paola Castellani & Alfonso Vargas-Sánchez, 2022. "Effective entrepreneurial narrative design in reward crowdfunding campaigns for social ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 773-800, June.
    16. Han Jiang & Zhiyi Wang & Lusi Yang & Jia Shen & Jungpil Hahn, 2021. "How Rewarding Are Your Rewards? A Value-Based View of Crowdfunding Rewards and Crowdfunding Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 45(3), pages 562-599, May.
    17. Andreas Hoegen & Dennis M. Steininger & Daniel Veit, 2018. "How do investors decide? An interdisciplinary review of decision-making in crowdfunding," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 339-365, August.
    18. Wesemann, Henrik & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "A whole new world: Counterintuitive crowdfunding insights for female founders," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 15(C).
    19. Etienne Schraven & Elco van Burg & Marco van Gelderen & Enno Masurel, 2020. "Predictions of Crowdfunding Campaign Success: The Influence of First Impressions on Accuracy and Positivity," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Hadar Gafni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs Périlleux, 2021. "Business or Basic Needs? The Impact of Loan Purpose on Social Crowdfunding Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 777-793, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01655014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.