IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01558978.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A pragmatist approach of audit practices : safety demonstration and safety assessment through technical dialogue

Author

Listed:
  • Jérémy Eydieux

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

  • Stéphanie Tillement

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes, IMT Atlantique - SSG - Département Sciences sociales et de gestion - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Benoît Journé

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes, IMT Atlantique - SSG - Département Sciences sociales et de gestion - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

Abstract

In France, nuclear risks are partly governed by a "technical dialog" surrounding safety demonstrations. In order to get an authorization for creating, running, or dismantling a nuclear installation, each nuclear operator must demonstrate to the ASN, and the national expert IRSN, that everything will be fine in the field. The purpose of this paper is to examine, with Dewey's Theory of Valuation, by which methods action is conducted when a demonstration is to be produced by a nuclear operator, and an assessment by IRSN. Indeed, a stabilized literature has thought auditing practices, but without clarification concerning how actors demonstrate or assess what has to be evaluated. We study two cases, one related to a demonstration and the other to an assessment. We mainly rely on document collection, and did a few interviews to complement. We analyzed the material through document analysis (types of documents and of intertextuality), and then did a narrative analysis based on two interpretive frameworks. Our results show that each organization realizes a management of beliefs and doubts, its own and those of other organizations. They also unfold 8 kinds of works, implemented in both cases, and finally show how they contribute to the management of managerial issues of auditing practices. We thus contribute to literature of these interorganizationnal relationships, by giving a few elements toward a pragmatist approach of them. We suggest that, as researchers, we should investigate more deeply these objects from a methodological standpoint, and make a few methodological and managerial contributions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2017. "A pragmatist approach of audit practices : safety demonstration and safety assessment through technical dialogue," Post-Print hal-01558978, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01558978
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://imt-atlantique.hal.science/hal-01558978v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://imt-atlantique.hal.science/hal-01558978v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathieu Detchessahar & Benoît Journé, 2007. "Une approche narrative des outils de gestion," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(5), pages 77-92.
    2. Boholm, Åsa & Corvellec, Hervé, 2015. "The role of valuation practices for risk identification," GRI-rapport 2015:4, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg Research Institute GRI.
    3. Grégory Rolina, 2010. "Prescrire la sûreté, négocier l'expertise," Post-Print hal-00829925, HAL.
    4. Mathieu Detchessahar & Benoît Journé, 2007. "Une approche narrative des outils de gestion," Post-Print hal-00263323, HAL.
    5. Erb, Carsten & Pelger, Christoph, 2015. "“Twisting words”? A study of the construction and reconstruction of reliability in financial reporting standard-setting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 13-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2020. "A pragmatist approach to audit practices: two cases of technical dialog from nuclear risk governance in France," Post-Print halshs-03721410, HAL.
    2. Christophe Maurel & François Pantin, 2020. "The French workers cooperatives approach to CSR: What is the relationship between discourse, practices and tools? [Caractériser la démarche des Scop en matière de RSE : quels couplages entre les di," Post-Print hal-02525162, HAL.
    3. Yoann Queyroi & David Carassus, 2021. "Analysis of the evolution of local management tools from a paradigm of control to that of steering: application to real estate management [Analyse de l'évolution des outils de la gestion locale d'u," Post-Print hal-03523814, HAL.
    4. Cécile Clergeau & Bénédicte Geffroy & Laetitia Pihel, 2008. "De la confiance à la distance, quand la GRH s’éloigne. Analyse des enjeux des transformations des choix de gestion des ressources humaines sur la relation à l’entreprise et la santé des personnels," Post-Print hal-04152929, HAL.
    5. François Meyssonnier & Nadim Tarafi & Dominique Barbelivien, 2021. "Le couplage de l’évaluation des managers et du contrôle de gestion dans les systèmes globaux de pilotage de la performance," Post-Print hal-03361386, HAL.
    6. Jérémy Eydieux & Stéphanie Tillement & Benoît Journé, 2016. "Élaboration des démonstrations et des évaluations de sûreté : une approche pragmatiste," Post-Print hal-01546183, HAL.
    7. Elena Raevskikh & Randa Omar Haidar & Norah Alkhamis, 2021. "Cultural indicators in Abu Dhabi: theoretic framework and challenges for their building," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(6), pages 2065-2086, December.
    8. Larbi Hasrouri, 2021. "Usage des indicateurs de performance par les chefs d’établissement : entre instrumentation et instrumentalisation," Post-Print hal-03354504, HAL.
    9. Rose Toki, 2019. "Les modalités d’appropriation des outils de gestion en contexte pluraliste : une double perspective théorique," Post-Print hal-02165511, HAL.
    10. Célia Lemaire & Thierry Nobre, 2014. "Roles D'Un Tableau De Bord Dit « De Pilotage De La Performance » Dans Le Secteur Medico-Social," Post-Print hal-01899569, HAL.
    11. Franck Aggeri & Julie Labatut, 2011. "Looking at management through its instruments," Post-Print hal-00639734, HAL.
    12. Stenka, Renata & Jaworska, Sylvia, 2019. "The use of made-up users," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    13. Christian Blecher, 2019. "The influence of uncertainty on the standard-setting decision between fair value and historical cost accounting under asymmetric information," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 47-72, July.
    14. Huikku, Jari & Mouritsen, Jan & Silvola, Hanna, 2017. "Relative reliability and the recognisable firm: Calculating goodwill impairment value," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 68-83.
    15. Durocher, Sylvain & Georgiou, Omiros, 2022. "Framing accounting for goodwill: Intractable controversies between users and standard setters," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    16. Ugochukwu J. Nwoye & Emma I. Okoye, 2018. "Integrity Trend Assessment of Pre and Post IFRS financial disclosures in Nigeria," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 4(3), pages 177-186, September.
    17. Zhang, Ying & Andrew, Jane, 2022. "Financialisation and the Conceptual Framework: An update," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Michaël Mangeon, 2016. "Quand la sûreté nucléaire sort de son « lit » : Gouverner le risque d'inondation sur un territoire nucléaire Michaël Mangeon," Post-Print hal-01535521, HAL.
    19. Cascino, Stefano & Clatworthy, Mark A. & Osma, Beatriz Garcia & Gassen, Joachim & Imam, Shahed, 2021. "The usefulness of financial accounting information: evidence from the field," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 107569, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Mathieu Detchessahar & Guy Minguet, 2012. "Santé au travail : l’enjeu du management," Post-Print hal-01372020, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pragmatist philosophy; Auditing practices; Risk governance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01558978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.