IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01478404.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L'évolution de la filière blé tendre en France entre 1980 et 2006 : quelle influence sur la diversité cultivée

Author

Listed:
  • Rémi Perronne

    (INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, GQE-Le Moulon - Génétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon (Génétique Végétale) - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 - AgroParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Mourad Hannachi

    (SADAPT - Sciences pour l'Action et le Développement : Activités, Produits, Territoires - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AgroParisTech, INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Stéphane Lemarié

    (INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Aline Fugeray-Scarbel

    (INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée de Grenoble - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019])

  • Isabelle Goldringer

    (INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, GQE-Le Moulon - Génétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon (Génétique Végétale) - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - UP11 - Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 - AgroParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Quels sont les principaux facteurs sociotechniques, économiques, organisationnels et réglementaires susceptibles d'avoir influencé la diversité cultivée au cours des dernières décennies ? Dans cet article, les auteurs présentent les résultats d'une réflexion sur le blé tendre, espèce cultivée d'intérêt économique majeur. Ils y présentent l'évolution des principaux cadres réglementaires, de la structure et de l'organisation de la filière, ainsi que l'évolution de l'offre variétale des obtenteurs et des distributeurs. Parmi les facteurs ayant pu influencer la diversité cultivée, ils accordent une attention particulière à l'accroissement de l'offre variétale et sa disponibilité auprès des agriculteurs, à la segmentation du marché et à la différenciation des gammes de variétés. Ce premier travail constitue un préalable afin de mieux prendre en compte les bénéfices associés à la biodiversité cultivée. Objet d'étude : ble tendre ; coopérative agricole ; meunerie ; triticum vulgare ; Phénomène, processus et fonction : diversité variétale ; diversité spatiale ; Dispositif technique et méthode d'étude : obtention végétale ; analyse de filière

Suggested Citation

  • Rémi Perronne & Mourad Hannachi & Stéphane Lemarié & Aline Fugeray-Scarbel & Isabelle Goldringer, 2016. "L'évolution de la filière blé tendre en France entre 1980 et 2006 : quelle influence sur la diversité cultivée," Post-Print hal-01478404, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01478404
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01478404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01478404/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucie Michel & David Makowski, 2013. "Comparison of Statistical Models for Analyzing Wheat Yield Time Series," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-11, October.
    2. Vanloqueren, Gaëtan & Baret, Philippe V., 2008. "Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural 'lock-in' case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pages 436-446, June.
    3. Arthur, W Brian, 1989. "Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(394), pages 116-131, March.
    4. Pierre Triboulet & Maryline Filippi, 2013. "Les déterminants de l'intensité des alliances capitalistiques entre groupes coopératifs agricoles," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 927-949.
    5. Faouzi Bensebaa, 2006. "Impact de la complexité des stratégies sur l’évitement de la concurrence," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 4(1), pages 5-26, November.
    6. Corey Lesk & Pedram Rowhani & Navin Ramankutty, 2016. "Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production," Nature, Nature, vol. 529(7584), pages 84-87, January.
    7. Triboulet, Pierre & Peres, Stephanie, 2015. "La répartition spatiale des industries agroalimentaires dans le secteur coopératif français," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 346(March-Apr).
    8. Stéphanie Peres & Maryline Filippi & Olivier Frey, 2012. "Ce que nous enseignent les statistiques nationales françaises sur les évolutions de la coopération agricole," Post-Print hal-01143911, HAL.
    9. Feinberg, Robert M., 1984. "Strategic and deterrent pricing responses to antitrust investigations," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 75-84, March.
    10. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    11. Maryline Filippi & Pierre Triboulet, 2011. "Alliances stratégiques et formes de contrôle dans les coopératives agricoles," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(1), pages 57-78.
    12. Smale, M. & Meng, E. & Brennan, J. P. & Hu, Ruifa, 2003. "Determinants of spatial diversity in modern wheat: examples from Australia and China," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 13-26, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guillaume Ollivier & Daniele Magda & Armelle Mazé & Gaël Plumecocq & Claire Lamine, 2018. "Agroecological transitions: what can sustainability transition frameworks teach us? An ontological and empirical analysis," Post-Print hal-02622145, HAL.
    2. Labarthe, Pierre & Coléno, François & Enjalbert, Jérôme & Fugeray-Scarbel, Aline & Hannachi, Mourad & Lemarié, Stéphane, 2021. "Exploration, exploitation and environmental innovation in agriculture. The case of variety mixture in France and Denmark," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Bullock, David S. & D'Arcangelo, Filippo Maria & Desquilbet, Marion, 2018. "A discussion of the market and policy failures associated with the adoption of herbicide-tolerant crops," TSE Working Papers 18-959, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Aug 2019.
    4. Marie Dervillé & Andrea Fink-Kessler & Aurelie Trouvé & Ikram Abdouttalib & Jean-Pierre del Corso & Charilaos Kephaliacos & Caetano Luiz Beber & Geneviève N'Guyen, 2018. "Comment peut se construire la compétitivité des exploitations laitières aujourd’hui ?," Working Papers hal-02329036, HAL.
    5. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    6. Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Anton, Marc & Cholez, Célia & Corre-Hellou, Guenaelle & Duc, Gérard & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Pelzer, Elise & Voisin, Anne-Sophie & Walrand, Stéphane, 2016. "Why are grain-legumes rarely present in cropping systems despite their environmental and nutritional benefits? Analyzing lock-in in the French agrifood system," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 152-162.
    7. Aurélie Cardona & Cristiana Carusi & Michael Mayerfeld Bell, 2021. "Engaged Intermediaries to Bridge the Gap between Scientists, Educational Practitioners and Farmers to Develop Sustainable Agri-Food Innovation Systems: A US Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Meynard, Jean-Marc & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Le Bail, Marianne & Lefèvre, Amélie & Magrini, Marie-Benoit & Michon, Camille, 2017. "Designing coupled innovations for the sustainability transition of agrifood systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 330-339.
    9. Valérie Angeon & Samuel Bates, 2020. "Implementing the agroecological transition: an analysis of decision-making rules in banana farming systems in the French West Indies [Mettre en œuvre la transition agroécologique : une analyse des ," Post-Print hal-03135324, HAL.
    10. Fugeray-Scarbel, Aline & Lemarié, Stéphane, 2024. "The amplified effect of market size on innovation: A comparative analysis of pea and wheat seed value chains in France," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    11. Kevin Maréchal & Hélène Aubaret-Joachain & Jean-Paul Ledant, 2008. "The influence of Economics on agricultural systems: an evolutionary and ecological perspective," Working Papers CEB 08-028.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    12. Aline Fugeray-Scarbel & Stéphane Lemarié, 2024. "The amplified effect of market size on innovation: A comparative analysis of pea and wheat seed value chains in France," Post-Print hal-04631965, HAL.
    13. Vanloqueren, Gaëtan & Baret, Philippe V., 2009. "How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 971-983, July.
    14. García-León, David & Contreras, Sergio & Hunink, Johannes, 2019. "Comparison of meteorological and satellite-based drought indices as yield predictors of Spanish cereals," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 388-396.
    15. Chiaverina, Pierre & Drogué, Sophie & Jacquet, Florence, 2024. "Do Farmers Participating in Short Food Supply Chains Use Less Pesticides? Evidence from France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Shikuku, Kelvin Mashisia & Tran, Nhuong & Joffre, Olivier M. & Islam, Abu Hayat Md Saiful & Barman, Benoy Kumar & Ali, Shawquat & Rossignoli, Cristiano M., 2021. "Lock-ins to the dissemination of genetically improved fish seeds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    17. Galli, Francesca & Prosperi, Paolo & Favilli, Elena & D'Amico, Simona & Bartolini, Fabio & Brunori, Gianluca, 2020. "How can policy processes remove barriers to sustainable food systems in Europe? Contributing to a policy framework for agri-food transitions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    18. Boulestreau, Yann & Casagrande, Marion & Navarrete, Mireille, 2023. "A method to design coupled innovations for the agroecological transition. Implementation for soil health management in Provencal sheltered vegetable systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    19. Plateau, Lou & Roudart, Laurence & Hudon, Marek & Maréchal, Kevin, 2021. "Opening the organisational black box to grasp the difficulties of agroecological transition. An empirical analysis of tensions in agroecological production cooperatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Bjørnåvold, Amalie & David, Maia & Bohan, David A. & Gibert, Caroline & Rousselle, Jean-Marc & Van Passel, Steven, 2022. "Why does France not meet its pesticide reduction targets? Farmers' socio-economic trade-offs when adopting agro-ecological practices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Meunerie; Filière agricole; Blé tendre; Diversité spatiale; diversité variétale; Obtention végétale; Coopérative agricole;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01478404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.