IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01412693.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Crowdsourcing vs Design Thinking. Une étude comparative de deux démarches d'innovation externe dans la phase d'idéation

Author

Listed:
  • Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

  • Julie Fabbri

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Delphine Manceau

    (NEOMA - Neoma Business School)

Abstract

Crowdsourcing and design thinking benefit from a strong attention in the media and are very popular among companies to generate ideas for new products and services. Yet little is known of their advantages and limitations in the ideation stage. Through an in-depth case study where both approaches were used in parallel, a detailed comparison and analysis was conducted. We show that crowdsourcing helps to generate a large number of ideas for the time invested and to identify trends in the market, but is neither cheaper nor faster than other external approaches. Design thinking provides a relevant analytical framework to give meaning to ideas generated by crowdsourcing, but does not always provide solutions that are operational.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Julie Fabbri & Delphine Manceau, 2016. "Crowdsourcing vs Design Thinking. Une étude comparative de deux démarches d'innovation externe dans la phase d'idéation," Post-Print hal-01412693, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01412693
    DOI: 10.7193/DM.083.123.138
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01412693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-01412693/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.7193/DM.083.123.138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Hauser & Gerard J. Tellis & Abbie Griffin, 2006. "Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 687-717, 11-12.
    2. Bernard Cova, 2008. "Consumer Made : quand le consommateur devient producteur," Post-Print halshs-02914385, HAL.
    3. Francis Salerno & Christophe Benavent & Pierre Volle & Delphine Manceau & Jean-François Trinquecoste & Éric Vernette & Élisabeth Tissier-Desbordes, 2013. "Éclairages sur le marketing de demain : prises de décisions, efficacité et légitimité," Post-Print hal-01637862, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maud Dampérat & Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Alain Jolibert, 2019. "Modeling a cocreative process: The contributions of design and management," Post-Print hal-03710025, HAL.
    2. Cyrielle Vellera & Elodie Jouny-Rivier & Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot, 2023. "Crowdsourcing innovation challenges: How participants react when their ideas are rejected," Post-Print hal-03841105, HAL.
    3. Luis Lages & Antonin Ricard & Aurélie Hemonnet-Goujot & Anne‐marie Guerin, 2020. "Frameworks for innovation, collaboration, and change: Value creation wheel, design thinking, creative problem‐solving, and lean," Post-Print hal-02734810, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tor Helge Aas & Karl Joachim Breunig & Katja Maria Hydle, 2017. "Exploring New Service Portfolio Management," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(06), pages 1-31, August.
    2. Małgorzata Wiścicka-Fernando & Sandra Misiak-Kwit & Kelaniyage Shihan Dilruk Fernando, 2019. "Co-Creation as an Innovative Way to Develop an Enterprise—Cross-Country Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Jugend, Daniel & da Silva, Sérgio Luis & Salgado, Manoel Henrique & Miguel, Paulo Augusto Cauchick, 2016. "Product portfolio management and performance: Evidence from a survey of innovative Brazilian companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5095-5100.
    4. Peres, Renana & Muller, Eitan & Mahajan, Vijay, 2010. "Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-106.
    5. Steven M. Shugan, 2007. "Editorial—The Anna Karenina Bias: Which Variables to Observe?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 145-148, 03-04.
    6. Barry L. Bayus, 2013. "Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 226-244, June.
    7. Pasquale Del Vecchio & Gioconda Mele & Valentina Ndou & Giustina Secundo, 2018. "Open Innovation and Social Big Data for Sustainability: Evidence from the Tourism Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Vincent K.K. Leung & Marco Chi Keung Lau & Zhe Zhang & Flora F. Gu, 2015. "Explorative versus exploitative alliances: evidence from the glass industry in China," Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 127-146, May.
    9. Reinhardt, Ronny & Gurtner, Sebastian, 2018. "The overlooked role of embeddedness in disruptive innovation theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 268-283.
    10. Laurene Fayolle & Sonia Capelli & William Sabadie, 2012. "Placement de marque interactif et image de marque : le cas des concerts," Post-Print halshs-00685324, HAL.
    11. Amini, Mehdi & Wakolbinger, Tina & Racer, Michael & Nejad, Mohammad G., 2012. "Alternative supply chain production–sales policies for new product diffusion: An agent-based modeling and simulation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 301-311.
    12. Xinfang (Jocelyn) Wang & Jeffrey D. Camm & David J. Curry, 2009. "A Branch-and-Price Approach to the Share-of-Choice Product Line Design Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1718-1728, October.
    13. Rašković, Matevž & Ding, Zhonghui & Škare, Vatroslav & Ozretić Došen, Đurđana & Žabkar, Vesna, 2016. "Comparing consumer innovativeness and ethnocentrism of young-adult consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3682-3686.
    14. Xueming Luo & Shuili Du, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 703-714, December.
    15. Aurora A. C. Teixeira & Pedro Cosme Vieira & Ana Patrícia Abreu, 2017. "Sleeping Beauties and their princes in innovation studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(2), pages 541-580, February.
    16. Sam Ransbotham & Sabyasachi Mitra, 2010. "Target Age and the Acquisition of Innovation in High-Technology Industries," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 2076-2093, November.
    17. Ashkan Negahban & Jeffrey S. Smith, 2018. "A joint analysis of production and seeding strategies for new products: an agent-based simulation approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 41-62, September.
    18. Materia, Valentina & Pascucci, Stefano & Dries, Liesbeth, 2015. "Are in-house and outsourcing innovation strategies interlinked? Evidence from the European agri-food sector," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212449, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Li Zuo & Gregory J. Fisher & Zhi Yang, 2019. "Organizational learning and technological innovation: the distinct dimensions of novelty and meaningfulness that impact firm performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1166-1183, November.
    20. Furrer, Olivier & Sudharshan, Devanathan & Tsiotsou, Rodoula H. & Liu, Ben S., 2016. "A framework for innovative service design," FSES Working Papers 476, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01412693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.