IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/jmmr228.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ambidextrous Leadership in Manufacture Industry in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Elfindah Princes

    (Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia Author-2-Name: Author-2-Workplace-Name: Author-3-Name: Author-3-Workplace-Name: Author-4-Name: Author-4-Workplace-Name: Author-5-Name: Author-5-Workplace-Name: Author-6-Name: Author-6-Workplace-Name: Author-7-Name: Author-7-Workplace-Name: Author-8-Name: Author-8-Workplace-Name:)

Abstract

Objective - Leadership has evolved (Cogliser & Brigham 2004) and has become more dynamic than ever before (McClean et. al. 2019). Prior research has shown that ambidexterity generates persistent and conflicting demands within an organization (Koryak et. al. 2018), while others have been successful (Diaz- Fernandez, Pasamar-Reyes & Valle-Cabrera, 2017). This paper highlights the strengths and challenges of two popular leadership styles in Indonesia, namely: transactional leadership and transformational leadership using two concepts of ambidextirity, exploitation and exploration. Ambidextirity is believed to be the answer to recent market shifts and can also help organisations to solve future problems. However, there is not a clear theory to determine when, where, and how to use ambidexterity. Methodology/Technique - This study uses a systematic literature review (Okoli et. al., 2014, Okoli & John, 2015), 5 in-depth interviews, a case study and reports from Ministry of Commerce to provide a solid theory of ambidexterity. The writer concludes that having ambidextrous skills in leadership is mandatory for the manufacturing industry and will guarantee future success (Tushman & O'Reilly, 2012). Finding - There are some barriers in implementing ambidextrous capabilities in leadership, namely cognitive conflicts, inertia, and confusion pressure on when and how to balance both transactional leadership and transformational leadership. The writer suggests that high transactional leadership and high transformational leadership will increase firm performance. Novelty � This paper has several limitations such as the unavailability of data on ambidextrous leadership in Indonesia, the limited scope as this research is conducted in manufacturing industries which might have different results in other industries, and the relatively short period of data collection. Future studies should address these limitations. Type of Paper - Review.

Suggested Citation

  • Elfindah Princes, 2019. "Ambidextrous Leadership in Manufacture Industry in Indonesia," GATR Journals jmmr228, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jmmr228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/JMMR/pdf_files/JMMRVol4(3)2019/7.Elfindah%20Princes.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini & Florence Charue-Duboc & François Fourcade, 2007. "Multilevel integration of exploration units : beyond the ambidextrous organization," Post-Print hal-00263341, HAL.
    3. Misra, Rupali & Srivastava, Sumita & Banwet, D.K., 2019. "Do religious and conscious investors make better economic decisions? Evidence from India," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 64-74.
    4. Arzubiaga, Unai & Kotlar, Josip & De Massis, Alfredo & Maseda, Amaia & Iturralde, Txomin, 2018. "Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the Board of Directors," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 455-469.
    5. Luis Ballesteros & Howard Kunreuther, 2018. "Organizational Decision Making Under Uncertainty Shocks," NBER Working Papers 24924, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Tim Swift, 2016. "The perilous leap between exploration and exploitation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1688-1698, August.
    7. Solomon Russom Habtay & Magnus Holmén, 2014. "Incumbents' responses to disruptive business model innovation: the moderating role of technology vs. market-driven innovation," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(4), pages 289-309.
    8. Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini & Florence Charue-Duboc & François Fourcade, 2007. "Multilevel integration of exploration units : beyond the ambidextrous organization," Post-Print hal-00263304, HAL.
    9. Sihem Ben Mahmoud-Jouini & Florence Charue-Duboc & François Fourcade, 2007. "Multilevel Integration of Exploration Units: Beyond the Ambidextrous Organization," Post-Print hal-00659462, HAL.
    10. Kassotaki, Olga, 2019. "Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 552-563.
    11. Faris Alghamdi, 2018. "Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Fain, Nusa & Wagner, Beverly & Kay, Neil, 2018. "Driving innovation through ambidextrous service provision — long life cycle products in manufacturing contexts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 3-13.
    13. Bonesso, Sara & Gerli, Fabrizio & Scapolan, Annachiara, 2014. "The individual side of ambidexterity: Do individuals’ perceptions match actual behaviors in reconciling the exploration and exploitation trade-off?," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 392-405.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabrina Hoessler & Claus-Christian Carbon, 2024. "Digital transformation in incumbent companies: a qualitative study on exploration and exploitation activities in innovation," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-31, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Kassotaki, 2022. "Review of Organizational Ambidexterity Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    2. Katou, Anastasia A. & Budhwar, Pawan S. & Patel, Charmi, 2021. "A trilogy of organizational ambidexterity: Leader’s social intelligence, employee work engagement and environmental changes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 688-700.
    3. Sylvain Lenfle, 2008. "Exploration and Project Management," Post-Print hal-00404168, HAL.
    4. Mario Le Glatin & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2018. "Can organisational ambidexterity kill innovation? A case for non-expected utility decision making," Post-Print hal-01808566, HAL.
    5. Florence Charue-Duboc & Franck Aggeri & Valérie Chanal & Gilles Garel, 2010. "Managing exploratory innovation," Post-Print halshs-00496341, HAL.
    6. Wang, Canhao & Jiao, Hao & Song, Jiayi, 2023. "Wear glasses for supervisors to discover the beauty of subordinates: Supervisor developmental feedback and organizational ambidexterity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    7. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    8. Montserrat Manzaneque & Alfonso A. Rojo-Ramírez & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Maria J. Martínez-Romero, 2020. "How negative aspiration performance gaps affect innovation efficiency," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 209-233, January.
    9. Kristina Stoiber & Kurt Matzler & Julia Hautz, 2023. "Ambidextrous structures paving the way for disruptive business models: a conceptual framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1439-1485, May.
    10. Turner, Karynne L. & Monti, Alberto & Annosi, Maria Carmela, 2021. "Disentangling the effects of organizational controls on innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 57-69.
    11. Hu, Wenan & Luo, Jinlian & Chen, Zhijun & Zhong, Jing, 2020. "Ambidextrous leaders helping newcomers get on board: Achieving adjustment and proaction through distinct pathways," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 406-414.
    12. Wu, Jie & Wood, Geoffrey & Chen, Xiaoyun & Meyer, Martin & Liu, Zhiyang, 2020. "Strategic ambidexterity and innovation in Chinese multinational vs. indigenous firms: The role of managerial capability," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    13. L. M. Daphne Yiu & Hugo K. S. Lam & Andy C. L. Yeung & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Enhancing the Financial Returns of R&D Investments through Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1658-1678, July.
    14. Baker, William E. & Mukherjee, Debmalya & Gattermann Perin, Marcelo, 2022. "Learning orientation and competitive advantage: A critical synthesis and future directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 863-873.
    15. François Constant & Richard Calvi & Thomas Johnsen, 2020. "Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing function ambidexterity Managing tensions between exploitative and exploratory innovation through purchasing functio," Post-Print hal-02891790, HAL.
    16. Yanhui Jiang & Chongyang Wei & Zhi Yang & Ulaganathan Subramanian, 2018. "Does Stronger R&D Capability Always Promote Better Innovation? The Moderating Role Of Knowledge Boundary Spanning Of R&D Network," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(07), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Yan, Ji & Tsinopoulos, Christos & Xiong, Yu, 2021. "Unpacking the impact of innovation ambidexterity on export performance: Microfoundations and infrastructure investment," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    18. Shuwaikh, Fatima & Brintte, Souad & Khemiri, Sabrina, 2022. "The impact of dynamic ambidexterity on the performance of organizations: Evidence from corporate venture capital investing in North America," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 991-1009.
    19. Julia Mueller & Birgit Renzl & Matthias Georg Will, 2020. "Ambidextrous leadership: a meta-review applying static and dynamic multi-level perspectives," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 37-59, February.
    20. Hazem Khaled Shehadeh & Mohammed Abed Hussein Al Taee, 2022. "Organizational Ambidexterity and Its Impact on Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Case Study in Islamic International Arab Bank in Amman City-Jordan," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 11, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Ambidextrous Leadership; Ambidextrous Organisations; Transformational; Transactional; Leadership Skills.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • M19 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Other
    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jmmr228. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.