IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gtr/gatrjs/jmmr140.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumers� Internal Meaning on Complementary Co-Branding Product by Using Osgood�s Theory of Semantic Differential

Author

Listed:
  • Rachmat Kriyantono

    (School of Communication, Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia)

Abstract

"Objective � The research focuses on applying semantic meaning theory and semantic differential scale to marketing communication, particularly co-branding products strategy, as an external stimulus to the consumers. The research aims to evaluate a hypothesis that co-brands have different meaning from the consumers, however, the consumers would express more positive meaning �evaluation, activity, potency- toward a parent brand. Methodology � Although co-branding products have been in use for some time, there is surprisingly little quantitative empirical research on the subject. Findings � A survey on 100 respondents reveals that although co-brands �Avanza and Xenia- have identical products, they have different meaning from the consumers, and the consumers express more positive meaning �evaluation, activity, potency- toward Avanza rather than Xenia. Novelty � It contributes to develop the study of co-branding in Indonesia."

Suggested Citation

  • Rachmat Kriyantono, 2017. "Consumers� Internal Meaning on Complementary Co-Branding Product by Using Osgood�s Theory of Semantic Differential," GATR Journals jmmr140, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    • Handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jmmr140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/pdf_files/JMMR%20Vol%202(2)/9.JMMR-Rachmat-CIMSSR-00281.pdf
    Download Restriction: http://gatrenterprise.com/GATRJournals/online_submission.html
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandru-Constantin Strunga, 2014. "Osgood's semantic differential: a review of the Romanian social sciences literature," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 1(2), pages 22-28, December.
    2. Bernd Helmig & Jan-Alexander Huber & Peter S. H. Leeflang, 2008. "Co-branding: The Stae of the Art," Schmalenbach Business Review (sbr), LMU Munich School of Management, vol. 60(4), pages 359-377, October.
    3. Dickinson, Sonia J. & Heath, Tara, 2008. "Cooperative Brand Alliances: How to Generate Positive Evaluations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 22-38.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Per Åsberg & Henrik Uggla, 2019. "Introducing multi-dimensional brand architecture: taking structure, market orientation and stakeholder alignment into account," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(5), pages 483-496, September.
    2. Samuylova, E. B. & Muravskii, D. V. & Smirnova, Maria M. & Alkanova, O. N., 2012. "The role of brand characteristics in brand alliance engagement with different types of partners: An exploratory study," Working Papers 833, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    3. Chia-Lin Lee, 2014. "Is Co-Branding a Double-Edged Sword for Brand Partners?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 19-34.
    4. Shan, Juan & Lu, Hebo & Cui, Annie Peng, 2022. "1 + 1 > 2? Is co-branding an effective way to improve brand masstige?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 556-571.
    5. Nguyen, Cathy & Romaniuk, Jenni & Cohen, Justin & Faulkner, Margaret, 2020. "When retailers and manufacturers advertise together; examining the effect of co-operative advertising on ad reach and memorability," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    6. Cathy Nguyen & Jenni Romaniuk & Margaret Faulkner & Justin Cohen, 2018. "Are two brands better than one? Investigating the effects of co-branding in advertising on audience memory," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 37-48, March.
    7. Paydas Turan, Ceyda, 2022. "Deal or deny: The effectiveness of crisis response strategies on brand equity of the focal brand in co-branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 615-629.
    8. Karray, Salma & Sigué, Simon Pierre, 2015. "A game-theoretic model for co-promotions: Choosing a complementary versus an independent product ally," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 84-100.
    9. Sylvain Sénéchal & Laurent Georges & Jean Pernin, 2014. "Alliances Between Corporate and Fair Trade Brands: Examining the Antecedents of Overall Evaluation of the Co-branded Product," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 365-381, October.
    10. Paydas Turan, Ceyda, 2021. "What's inside matters: The impact of ingredient branding on consumers' purchasing behaviours in services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Klimczuk-Kochańska, Magdalena, 2017. "Startup as a partner of cooperation for big company in the agri-food industry: Analysis of forms of cooperation on examples," MPRA Paper 84756, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bram Roosens & Nathalie Dens & Annouk Lievens, 2019. "Effects Of Partners’ Communications On Consumer Perceptions Of Joint Innovation Efforts," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(08), pages 1-26, December.
    13. Casey E. Newmeyer & R. Venkatesh & Julie A. Ruth & Rabikar Chatterjee, 2018. "A typology of brand alliances and consumer awareness of brand alliance integration," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 275-289, September.
    14. Kalafatis, Stavros P. & Ledden, Lesley & Riley, Debra & Singh, Jaywant, 2016. "The added value of brand alliances in higher education," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3122-3132.
    15. Hsiang-Ming Lee & Tsai Chen & Ya-Hui Hsu & Yu-Chi Wu, 2018. "Effect Of Complementary Product Fit And Brand Awareness On Brand Attitude After M&As: Word Of Mouth As A Moderator," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(1), pages 51-67.
    16. Veronica Gabrielli & Ilaria Baghi, 2019. "How to choose the endorser: An experimental analysis on the effects of fit and notoriety," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(4), pages 57-89.
    17. Nguyen, Hang T. & Ross, William T. & Pancras, Joseph & Phan, Hieu V., 2020. "Market-based drivers of cobranding success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 122-138.
    18. Andrea Lucarelli, 2018. "Co-branding public place brands: towards an alternative approach to place branding," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(4), pages 260-271, November.
    19. Zhang, Qiao & Chen, Jing & Lin, Jun, 2022. "Market targeting with social influences and risk aversion in a co-branding alliance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 301-318.
    20. Cesaroni, Fabrizio & Maydeu Olivares, Alberto & Ho, Han Chiang, 2011. "Understanding the role of attitude components in co-branding: an application to high-tech, luxury co-branded products," IC3JM - Estudios = Working Papers id-11-01, Instituto Mixto Carlos III - Juan March de Ciencias Sociales (IC3JM).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Co-branding Product; Indonesia; Marketing Communication; Osgood�s Semantic Differential; Semantic Meaning Theory.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gtr:gatrjs:jmmr140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Dr. Abd Rahim Mohamad (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://gatrenterprise.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.