IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gda/wpaper/1605.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Court Excellence Model as a tool of improving the organizational efficiency of courts

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Kuczewska

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Gdansk)

  • Sylwia Morawska

    (Collegium of Business Administration, Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

The measure of organizational efficiency of the judiciary is to meet needs and requirements of internal and external stakeholders. Benchmarking is the process of investigation of the most effective solutions that produce superior performance in organisations. This concept could be successfully implemented in organisation of justice. The aim of the paper is to present the benchmarking concept and possibilities of its implementation using EFQM Business Excellence Model for improving the organizational efficiency of courts.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Kuczewska & Sylwia Morawska, 2016. "Court Excellence Model as a tool of improving the organizational efficiency of courts," Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division 1605, The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division.
    • Handle: RePEc:gda:wpaper:1605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gnu.univ.gda.pl/~keie/aio41.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joanna Kuczewska & Sylwia Morawska, 2016. "Proposal of benchmarking concerning cooperation networks between justice organisations," Working Papers of Economics of European Integration Division 1603, The Univeristy of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics, Economics of European Integration Division.
    2. Myrna Mandell & Robyn Keast, 2008. "Evaluating the effectiveness of interorganizational relations through networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 715-731.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ter Bogt, Henk & Tillema, Sandra, 2016. "Accounting for trust and control: Public sector partnerships in the arts," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 5-23.
    2. Annette Quayle & Johanne Grosvold & Larelle Chapple, 2019. "New modes of managing grand challenges: Cross-sector collaboration and the refugee crisis of the Asia Pacific," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(4), pages 665-686, November.
    3. Wanjuan Wang & Hongbo Gong, 2022. "Formation Mechanism of a Coastal Zone Environment Collaborative Governance Relationship: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on fsQCA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Nicaise, Pablo & Dubois, Vincent & Lorant, Vincent, 2014. "Mental health care delivery system reform in Belgium: The challenge of achieving deinstitutionalisation whilst addressing fragmentation of care at the same time," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 120-127.
    5. Steffie Lucidarme & Greet Cardon & Annick Willem, 2016. "A Comparative Study of Health Promotion Networks: Configurations of determinants for network effectiveness," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 1163-1217, September.
    6. Tyler A. Scott & Nicola Ulibarri & Ryan P. Scott, 2020. "Stakeholder involvement in collaborative regulatory processes: Using automated coding to track attendance and actions," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(2), pages 219-237, April.
    7. Michael J. Fratantuono & David M. Sarcone, 2017. "Strategic Challenges Confronting Leaders of a Cross-Sector Collaboration Organization Created to Improve Community Health," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    8. Ofek, Yuval, 2017. "Evaluating social exclusion interventions in university-community partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 46-55.
    9. Annick Willem & Steffie Lucidarme, 2014. "Pitfalls and Challenges for Trust and Effectiveness in Collaborative Networks," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(5), pages 733-760, June.
    10. Cristina Campanale & Sara Giovanna Mauro & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 275-306, March.
    11. Bravi, F. & Gibertoni, D. & Marcon, A. & Sicotte, C. & Minvielle, E. & Rucci, P. & Angelastro, A. & Carradori, T. & Fantini, M.P., 2013. "Hospital network performance: A survey of hospital stakeholders’ perspectives," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 150-157.
    12. Rui Mu & Junting Jia & Wancong Leng & Maidina Haershan & Jiwei Jin, 2018. "What Conditions, in Combination, Drive Inter-Organizational Activities? Evidence from Cooperation on Environmental Governance in Nine Urban Agglomerations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Fanny Salignac & Tracy Wilcox & Axelle Marjolin & Sarah Adams, 2018. "Understanding Collective Impact in Australia: A new approach to interorganizational collaboration," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 91-110, February.
    14. Steffie Lucidarme & Mathieu Marlier & Greet Cardon & Ilse Bourdeaudhuij & Annick Willem, 2014. "Critical success factors for physical activity promotion through community partnerships," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(1), pages 51-60, February.
    15. Arntsen, Bjørnulf & Torjesen, Dag Olaf & Karlsen, Tor-Ivar, 2020. "Associations between structures, processes and outcomes in inter-municipal cooperation in out-of-hours services in Norway: A survey study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    16. Willem, Annick, 2010. "Trust in whole networks in the public and nonprofit sector: The impact of public sector characteristics," Working Papers 2010/13, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    justice; benchmarking; efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gda:wpaper:1605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tomasz Brodzicki (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegdapl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.