IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/1473.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural insurance and the World Trade Organization:

Author

Listed:
  • Glauber, Joseph W.

Abstract

This paper examines how agricultural insurance programs are treated under the World Trade Organization (WTO). Agricultural insurance programs have grown considerably over the past 25 years and now are an integral part of many domestic support programs, not just in developed countries, but in important emerging markets as well. An often-cited impetus for the growth in insurance program is the potential treatment of such programs as exempt from WTO reduction commitments. Under Annex 2 of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture, domestic support measures that have, at most, a minimal impact on trade, so-called green box policies, are excluded from reduction commitments. Yet while WTO rules shield green box policies from reduction, few developed countries have notified agricultural insurance policies under Annex 2. Moreover, crop insurance programs have been challenged in recent WTO dispute settlement cases and domestic countervailing duty investigations.

Suggested Citation

  • Glauber, Joseph W., 2015. "Agricultural insurance and the World Trade Organization:," IFPRI discussion papers 1473, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cdm15738.contentdm.oclc.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/129733/filename/129944.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce A. Babcock & David A. Hennessy, 1996. "Input Demand under Yield and Revenue Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(2), pages 416-427.
    2. Graff Zivin, Joshua S. & Perloff, Jeffrey M. (ed.), 2012. "The Intended and Unintended Effects of U.S. Agricultural and Biotechnology Policies," National Bureau of Economic Research Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226988030, September.
    3. Xiaodong Du & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy, 2017. "Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 732-756.
    4. Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Goetz, Linde & Glauben, Thomas, 2014. "How well does the crop insurance market function in Russia?," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182856, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Joshua S. Graff Zivin & Jeffrey M. Perloff, 2012. "The Intended and Unintended Effects of US Agricultural and Biotechnology Policies," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number perl10-1.
    6. Jesús Antón & Shingo Kimura & Roger Martini, 2011. "Risk Management in Agriculture in Canada," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 40, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio G. Santeramo & A. Ford Ramsey, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the EU: Lessons and Caution from the US," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(3), pages 34-39, December.
    2. Sabwa, Nicholas & Collins, Julia, 2018. "Major developments affecting Africa’s trade performance: A summary of key literature," IFPRI book chapters, in: Africa agriculture trade monitor 2018, chapter 6, pages 110-130, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Fabian Capitanio & Antonio De Pin, 2018. "Measures of Efficiency of Agricultural Insurance in Italy, Economic Evaluations," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Vincent H. Smith & Joseph W. Glauber, 2020. "Trade, policy, and food security," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 159-171, January.
    5. Xiaodong Du & Hongli Feng & David A. Hennessy, 2017. "Rationality of Choices in Subsidized Crop Insurance Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 732-756.
    6. Matthews, Alan & Salvatici, Luca & Scoppola, Margherita, 2017. "Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU," Commissioned Papers 252767, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. Hongli Feng & Xiaodong Du & David A. Hennessy, 2020. "Depressed demand for crop insurance contracts, and a rationale based on third generation Prospect Theory," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 59-73, January.
    8. Ramsey, Austin Ford & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2017. "Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States," MPRA Paper 79164, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Joseph W. Glauber, 2021. "US Trade Aid Payments and the WTO," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(2), pages 586-603, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glauber, Joseph W., 2017. "Agricultural insurance and the WTO:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Peter Slade, 2021. "The impact of price hedging on subsidized insurance: Evidence from Canada," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(4), pages 447-464, December.
    3. Tatyana Deryugina & Barrett Kirwan, 2018. "Does The Samaritan'S Dilemma Matter? Evidence From U.S. Agriculture," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(2), pages 983-1006, April.
    4. Anthony Baffoe-Bonnie & Christopher T. Bastian & Dale J. Menkhaus & Owen R. Phillips, 2021. "Stacking Subsidies in Factor Markets: Evidence from Market Experiments," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Wilhelm Klümper & Matin Qaim, 2014. "A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
    6. Hongli Feng & Xiaodong Du & David A. Hennessy, 2020. "Depressed demand for crop insurance contracts, and a rationale based on third generation Prospect Theory," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 59-73, January.
    7. Nathan D. DeLay & Hayley H. Chouinard & Cory G. Walters & Philip R. Wandschneider, 2020. "The influence of crop insurance agents on coverage choices: The role of agent competition," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 623-638, July.
    8. Jisang Yu & Edward D. Perry, 2024. "Premium subsidies and selection in the federal crop insurance program," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 280-297, February.
    9. Joseph P. Janzen & Nathan P. Hendricks, 2020. "Are Farmers Made Whole by Trade Aid?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(2), pages 205-226, June.
    10. Mwita Erick Marwa & John Mburu & Rao Elizaphan James Oburu & Okeyo Mwai & Susan Kahumbu, 2024. "Impact of ICT Based Extension Services on Dairy Production and Household Welfare: The Case of iCow Service in Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 141-141, April.
    11. Tangermann, Stefan, 2011. "Risk Management in Agriculture and the Future of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy," National Policies, Trade and Sustainable Development 320171, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    12. Hsing-Hsiang Huang & Michael R. Moore, 2018. "Farming under Weather Risk: Adaptation, Moral Hazard, and Selection on Moral Hazard," NBER Chapters, in: Agricultural Productivity and Producer Behavior, pages 77-124, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Roberts, Michael J. & O'Donoghue, Erik J. & Key, Nigel D., 2003. "Chemical And Fertilizer Applications In Response To Crop Insurance: Evidence From Census Micro Data," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21895, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Yu, Jisang & Hendricks, Nathan P., 2017. "Crop Insurance Moral Hazard from Price and Weather Forecasts," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258336, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Magali Aubert & Geoffroy Enjolras, 2012. "Quand le surdosage devient la norme : un diagnostic des exploitations viticoles françaises," Post-Print hal-02749128, HAL.
    16. Coleman, Jane A. & Shaik, Saleem, 2009. "Time-Varying Estimation of Crop Insurance Program in Altering North Dakota Farm Economic Structure," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49516, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. María Bielza & Alberto Garrido & José M. Sumpsi, 2004. "Revenue insurance as an income stabilization policy: an application to the Spanish olive oil sector," Post-Print hal-01201063, HAL.
    18. Arora, Gaurav & Agarwal, Sandip K., 2020. "Agricultural input use and index insurance adoption: Concept and evidence," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304508, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. David A. Hennessy & Bruce A. Babcock & Dermot J. Hayes, 1997. "Budgetary and Producer Welfare Effects of Revenue Insurance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(3), pages 1024-1034.
    20. Chongshang Zhang & Kaiyu Lyu & Chi Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Crop Insurance on Fertilizer Use: Evidence from Grain Producers in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:1473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.