IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eti/dpaper/23033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Foreign Direct Investment and Labor Market Flexibility in Host and Source Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Isao KAMATA

Abstract

Recent studies have identified the tendency of host countries with flexible labor markets or lax employment protection to attract more foreign direct investment (FDI). However, most such studies have examined the relationship between the strictness of labor regulations in individual countries and their aggregated inward FDI. This study investigates the extent to which FDI is attracted by labor market flexibility, with a focus on host countries’ institutional flexibility in employment adjustment and their relative flexibility compared to investor firms’ home countries, through an empirical analysis using a unique dataset constructed with bilateral data on FDI between a large number of both developed and developing countries and various indicators concerning labor market regulations in those countries. The result suggests the following: (i) what primarily matters is the (absolute) flexibility in the host country, that is, a country with a greater degree of flexibility in labor regulations or employment adjustment tends to draw larger FDI inflow; (ii) the impact of a host country’s relative flexibility compared to the FDI source country may be secondary, particularly in the case of the stock of FDI; and (iii) there is some evidence of the “anchorage effect†of a source country’s labor market regulations, which implies that inflexibility in employment adjustment or strict labor regulations could discourage outward FDI from the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Isao KAMATA, 2023. "Foreign Direct Investment and Labor Market Flexibility in Host and Source Countries," Discussion papers 23033, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    • Handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:23033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/23e033.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beata Smarzynska Javorcik & Mariana Spatareanu, 2005. "Do Foreign Investors Care about Labor Market Regulations?," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 141(3), pages 375-403, October.
    2. Davies, Ronald B. & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2013. "A race to the bottom in labor standards? An empirical investigation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Alschner, Wolfgang & Elsig, Manfred & Polanco, Rodrigo, 2021. "Introducing the Electronic Database of Investment Treaties (EDIT): The Genesis of a New Database and Its Use," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 73-94, February.
    4. David KUCERA, 2002. "Core labour standards and foreign direct investment," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 141(1-2), pages 31-69, March.
    5. Hoshi, Takeo & Kiyota, Kozo, 2019. "Potential for inward foreign direct investment in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 32-52.
    6. Pence Karen M., 2006. "The Role of Wealth Transformations: An Application to Estimating the Effect of Tax Incentives on Saving," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26.
    7. Satomi Kimino & David S. Saal & Nigel Driffield, 2007. "Macro Determinants of FDI Inflows to Japan: An Analysis of Source Country Characteristics," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 446-469, March.
    8. Head, Keith & Ries, John, 2008. "FDI as an outcome of the market for corporate control: Theory and evidence," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 2-20, January.
    9. Isao KAMATA, 2020. "Labor Market Flexibility and Inward Foreign Direct Investment," Discussion papers 20057, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    10. William W. Olney, 2010. "A Race to the Bottom? Employment Protection and Foreign Direct Investment," Department of Economics Working Papers 2011-02, Department of Economics, Williams College, revised Aug 2013.
    11. Neumayer, Eric & Soysa, Indra de, 2006. "Globalization and the Right to Free Association and Collective Bargaining: An Empirical Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 31-49, January.
    12. Kahouli, Bassem & Maktouf, Samir, 2015. "The determinants of FDI and the impact of the economic crisis on the implementation of RTAs: A static and dynamic gravity model," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 518-529.
    13. Valeriano Martínez-San Román & Marta Bengoa & Blanca Sánchez-Robles, 2016. "Foreign direct investment, trade integration and the home bias: evidence from the European Union," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 197-229, February.
    14. Olney, William W., 2013. "A race to the bottom? Employment protection and foreign direct investment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 191-203.
    15. Gerda Dewit & Dermot Leahy & Catia Montagna, 2013. "Employment Protection, Flexibility and Firms' Strategic Location Decisions under Uncertainty," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 80(319), pages 441-474, July.
    16. Michael Frenkel & Benedikt Walter, 2019. "Do bilateral investment treaties attract foreign direct investment? The role of international dispute settlement provisions," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 1316-1342, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fangjin Ye, 2020. "The impact of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) on collective labor rights in developing countries," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 899-921, October.
    2. Isao KAMATA, 2020. "Labor Market Flexibility and Inward Foreign Direct Investment," Discussion papers 20057, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    3. Isao KAMATA, 2021. "Labor Market Flexibility and Inward Foreign Direct Investment:Incentive or Outcome?," Discussion papers e-20-007, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    4. Raess, Damian & Wagner, Patrick, 2022. "South to north investment linkages and decent work in Brazil," Papers 1382, World Trade Institute.
    5. Sulistiyo K. Ardiyono & Arianto A. Patunru, 2022. "The impact of employment protection on FDI at different stages of economic development," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(12), pages 3679-3714, December.
    6. Daniela Maggioni & Grazia D. Santangelo & Seda Koymen-Ozer, 2019. "MNEs’ location strategies and labor standards: The role of operating and reputational considerations across industries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(6), pages 948-972, August.
    7. Patrick Wagner & Damian Raess, 2023. "South to north investment linkages and decent work in Brazil," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 37(1), pages 122-159, March.
    8. Gerda Dewit & Holger Görg & Yama Temouri, 2019. "Employment Protection and Firm Relocation: Theory and Evidence," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 86(344), pages 663-688, October.
    9. Di Ubaldo, Mattia & Gasiorek, Michael, 2022. "Non-trade provisions in trade agreements and FDI," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Trifković, Neda, 2017. "Spillover Effects of International Standards: Working Conditions in the Vietnamese SMEs," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 79-101.
    11. Messerschmidt, Luca & Janz, Nicole, 2023. "Unravelling the ‘race to the bottom’ argument: Foreign direct investment and different types of labour rights," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Luca Messerschmidt & Nicole Janz, 2020. "Unravelling the 'race to the bottom' argument: How does FDI affect different types of labour rights?," Munich Papers in Political Economy 05, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    13. Walid Tijerina, 2021. "Come In, We’re Open (and Flexible): Trade Openness, Labour Flexibility, and Varieties of Capitalism," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(5), pages 613-624, November.
    14. Koen Maaskant & Victoria Strokova, 2021. "More, Better, and More Inclusive Industrial Jobs in Ethiopia," World Bank Publications - Reports 36807, The World Bank Group.
    15. Xinmeng Li & Dao-Zhi Zeng, 2022. "Frictional unemployment, bargaining, and agglomeration," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(1), pages 151-179, February.
    16. Ghodsi, Mahdi, 2020. "How do technical barriers to trade affect foreign direct investment? Tariff jumping versus regulation haven hypotheses," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 269-278.
    17. Kamata, Isao, 2018. "Can RTA labor provisions prevent the deterioration of domestic labor standards? : the cases of statutory minimum wages and employment protection regulations," IDE Discussion Papers 716, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    18. Guasti, Alessandro & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, 2022. "Has global trade competition really led to a race to the bottom in labor standards?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113752, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Joel Hellier & Ekaterina Kalugina, 2015. "Globalization and the working poor," Working Papers 355, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    20. Jianchun Fang & Giray Gozgor & James H. Nolt, 2022. "Globalisation, economic uncertainty and labour market regulations: Implications for the COVID‐19 crisis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(7), pages 2165-2187, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eti:dpaper:23033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: TANIMOTO, Toko (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rietijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.