IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/1189.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A new model for visualizing interactions in analysis of variance

Author

Listed:
  • Groenen, P.J.F.
  • Koning, A.J.

Abstract

In analysis of variance, there is usually little attention for interpreting the terms of the effects themselves, especially for interaction effects. One of the reasons is that the number of interaction-effect terms increases rapidly with the number of predictor variables and the number of categories. In this paper, we propose a new model, called the interaction decomposition model, that allows to visualize the interactions. We argue that with the help of the visualization, the interaction-effect terms are much easier to interpret. We apply our method to predict holiday spending1 using seven categorical predictor variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Groenen, P.J.F. & Koning, A.J., 2004. "A new model for visualizing interactions in analysis of variance," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2004-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/1189/ei200406.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harry Gollob, 1968. "A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(1), pages 73-115, March.
    2. Siciliano, Roberta & Mooijaart, Ab, 1997. "Three-factor association models for three-way contingency tables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 337-356, May.
    3. Vartan Choulakian, 1996. "Generalized bilinear models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 271-283, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Rosmalen, J.M. & Koning, A.J. & Groenen, P.J.F., 2007. "Optimal Scaling of Interaction Effects in Generalized Linear Models," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    2. John C. Gower & Sugnet Gardner-Lubbe & Niel J. Le Roux, 2018. "Interaction: Fisher’s Optimal Scores Revisited," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 92-112, March.
    3. Raymond Sin-Kwok Wong, 2001. "Multidimensional Association Models," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 30(2), pages 197-240, November.
    4. Ahakpaz, Farhad & Abdi, Hossein & Neyestani, Elyas & Hesami, Ali & Mohammadi, Behrouz & Mahmoudi, Kourosh Nader & Abedi-Asl, Gholamreza & Noshabadi, Mohammad Reza Jazayeri & Ahakpaz, Farzad & Alipour,, 2021. "Genotype-by-environment interaction analysis for grain yield of barley genotypes under dryland conditions and the role of monthly rainfall," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    5. Franck, Christopher T. & Nielsen, Dahlia M. & Osborne, Jason A., 2013. "A method for detecting hidden additivity in two-factor unreplicated experiments," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 95-104.
    6. Griffin, Maryclare & Hoff, Peter D., 2019. "Lasso ANOVA decompositions for matrix and tensor data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 181-194.
    7. Odette D. Weedon & Maria R. Finckh, 2019. "Heterogeneous Winter Wheat Populations Differ in Yield Stability Depending on their Genetic Background and Management System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, November.
    8. repec:jss:jstsof:34:i10 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yoshio Takane & Tadashi Shibayama, 1991. "Principal component analysis with external information on both subjects and variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 56(1), pages 97-120, March.
    10. Erik Schwarzbach & Jiří Hartmann & Hans-Peter Piepho, 2007. "Multiplicative main cultivar effects in Czech official winter wheat trials 1976-2005," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 43(4), pages 117-124.
    11. Jan Schepers & Hans-Hermann Bock & Iven Mechelen, 2017. "Maximal Interaction Two-Mode Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 34(1), pages 49-75, April.
    12. Gordon Bechtel, 1973. "Nonlinear submodels of orthogonal linear models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 379-392, September.
    13. Fithian, William & Josse, Julie, 2017. "Multiple correspondence analysis and the multilogit bilinear model," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 87-102.
    14. Choulakian, Vartan, 2005. "Transposition invariant principal component analysis in L1 for long tailed data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 23-31, January.
    15. Kamila Nowosad & Jan Bocianowski & Farzad Kianersi & Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh, 2023. "Analysis of Linkage on Interaction of Main Aspects (Genotype by Environment Interaction, Stability and Genetic Parameters) of 1000 Kernels in Maize ( Zea mays L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Mark Appelbaum, 1986. "Statistics, data analysis and Psychometrika: Major developments," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 53-56, March.
    17. Stegeman, Alwin, 2014. "Finding the limit of diverging components in three-way Candecomp/Parafac—A demonstration of its practical merits," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 203-216.
    18. Brian Gin & Nicholas Sim & Anders Skrondal & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh, 2020. "A Dyadic IRT Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 85(3), pages 815-836, September.
    19. Johannes Forkman & Hans-Peter Piepho, 2014. "Parametric bootstrap methods for testing multiplicative terms in GGE and AMMI models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(3), pages 639-647, September.
    20. S. Hadasch & J. Forkman & W. A. Malik & H. P. Piepho, 2018. "Weighted Estimation of AMMI and GGE Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(2), pages 255-275, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.