IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p2005-d1260305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Linkage on Interaction of Main Aspects (Genotype by Environment Interaction, Stability and Genetic Parameters) of 1000 Kernels in Maize ( Zea mays L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Kamila Nowosad

    (Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki 24A, 53-363 Wrocław, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jan Bocianowski

    (Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 28, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Farzad Kianersi

    (School of Enviromental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada)

  • Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh

    (Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj P.O. Box 3158854119, Iran)

Abstract

The assessment of 1000-kernel weight holds significant importance in determining maize grain yield, and elucidating its underlying genetic mechanisms is imperative for enhancing its overall performance. The material for the study consisted of 26 doubled-haploid (DH) maize lines obtained from crossing two cultivars with flint kernels. Lines were planted in the northern part of the Lower Silesia voivodship in Poland over ten years (2013–2022). The 1000-kernel weight was assessed. The purposes of the research were as follows: (1) to assess genotype by environment interaction (GEI by the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model; (2) the selection of stable DH lines and environment-specific lines; and (3) the estimation of parameters related to additive and additive–additive gene interaction (epistasis). The results indicate the significant effects of genotype and environment, as well as the GEI, on the 1000-kernel weight. Estimates of additive gene action effects were statistically significant in every year of the study, except 2022. Estimates of epistasis (total additive-by-additive interaction) effects for 1000-kernel weight were statistically significant in 2013, 2015, and 2017 (positive effects), as well as in 2018 and 2020 (negative effects). The lines KN07 and KN10 are recommended for further inclusion in the breeding program due to their stability and highest average of 1000-kernel weight.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamila Nowosad & Jan Bocianowski & Farzad Kianersi & Alireza Pour-Aboughadareh, 2023. "Analysis of Linkage on Interaction of Main Aspects (Genotype by Environment Interaction, Stability and Genetic Parameters) of 1000 Kernels in Maize ( Zea mays L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:2005-:d:1260305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/2005/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/2005/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vasileios Greveniotis & Elisavet Bouloumpasi & Stylianos Zotis & Athanasios Korkovelos & Constantinos G. Ipsilandis, 2021. "Estimations on Trait Stability of Maize Genotypes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Harry Gollob, 1968. "A statistical model which combines features of factor analytic and analysis of variance techniques," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 33(1), pages 73-115, March.
    3. Jacques Fils Pierre & Luis Latournerie-Moreno & René Garruña & Krista L. Jacobsen & Carrie A. M. Laboski & Roberth Us-Santamaría & Esaú Ruiz-Sánchez, 2022. "Effect of Maize–Legume Intercropping on Maize Physio-Agronomic Parameters and Beneficial Insect Abundance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    4. Li, Xiao-Yan & Gong, Jia-Dong, 2002. "Effects of different ridge:furrow ratios and supplemental irrigation on crop production in ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting system with mulches," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 243-254, April.
    5. Heena Panchasara & Nahidul Hoque Samrat & Nahina Islam, 2021. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Mitigation Measures in Australian Agriculture Sector—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Quintero, J.A. & Montoya, M.I. & Sánchez, O.J. & Giraldo, O.H. & Cardona, C.A., 2008. "Fuel ethanol production from sugarcane and corn: Comparative analysis for a Colombian case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 385-399.
    7. Felten, Daniel & Fröba, Norbert & Fries, Jérôme & Emmerling, Christoph, 2013. "Energy balances and greenhouse gas-mitigation potentials of bioenergy cropping systems (Miscanthus, rapeseed, and maize) based on farming conditions in Western Germany," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 160-174.
    8. Olaf Erenstein & Moti Jaleta & Kai Sonder & Khondoker Mottaleb & B.M. Prasanna, 2022. "Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1295-1319, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shixiong Song & Siyuan Zhao & Ye Zhang & Yongxi Ma, 2023. "Carbon Emissions from Agricultural Inputs in China over the Past Three Decades," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    3. Geraili, A. & Sharma, P. & Romagnoli, J.A., 2014. "Technology analysis of integrated biorefineries through process simulation and hybrid optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 145-159.
    4. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Wendelin Wichtmann & Grzegorz Zając & Piotr Banaszuk, 2023. "Common Reed and Maize Silage Co-Digestion as a Pathway towards Sustainable Biogas Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    6. Shanshan Zhao & Mingsen Qin & Xia Yang & Wenke Bai & Yunfeng Yao & Junqiang Wang, 2023. "Freeze–Thaw Cycles Have More of an Effect on Greenhouse Gas Fluxes than Soil Water Content on the Eastern Edge of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Li-fang Wang & Juan Chen & Zhou-ping Shangguan, 2015. "Yield Responses of Wheat to Mulching Practices in Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Ali, Shahzad & Jan, Amanullah & Zhang, Peng & Khan, Muhammad Numan & Cai, Tei & Wei, Ting & Ren, Xiaolong & Jia, Qianmin & Han, Qingfang & Jia, Zhikuan, 2016. "Effects of ridge-covering mulches on soil water storage and maize production under simulated rainfall in semiarid regions of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Keller, Victor & Lyseng, Benjamin & English, Jeffrey & Niet, Taco & Palmer-Wilson, Kevin & Moazzen, Iman & Robertson, Bryson & Wild, Peter & Rowe, Andrew, 2018. "Coal-to-biomass retrofit in Alberta –value of forest residue bioenergy in the electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 373-383.
    10. Tsita, Katerina G. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2012. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for the Greek road transport sector using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 677-686.
    11. Gong, Daozhi & Mei, Xurong & Hao, Weiping & Wang, Hanbo & Caylor, Kelly K., 2017. "Comparison of ET partitioning and crop coefficients between partial plastic mulched and non-mulched maize fields," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 23-34.
    12. Muhammad Salim Butt & Hifsa Shahid & Farhan Ahmed Butt & Iqra Farhat & Munazza Sadaf & Muhammad Raashid & Ahmad Taha, 2022. "Power Generation Analysis of Terrestrial Ultraviolet-Assisted Solid Oxide Electrolyzer Cell," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    13. Kalim Shah & George Philippidis & Hari Dulal & Gernot Brodnig, 2014. "Developing biofuels industry in small economies: Policy experiences and lessons from the caribbean basin initiative," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 229-253, February.
    14. Barhdadi Amina & Dubé Marie-Pierre, 2010. "Testing for Gene-Gene Interaction with AMMI Models," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, January.
    15. Stolarski, Mariusz J. & Krzyżaniak, Michał & Warmiński, Kazimierz & Tworkowski, Józef & Szczukowski, Stefan & Olba–Zięty, Ewelina & Gołaszewski, Janusz, 2017. "Energy efficiency of perennial herbaceous crops production depending on the type of digestate and mineral fertilizers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 50-60.
    16. Paiano, Annarita & Lagioia, Giovanni, 2016. "Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 161-173.
    17. Zhang, Guangxin & Dai, Rongcheng & Ma, Wenzhuo & Fan, Hengzhi & Meng, Wenhui & Han, Juan & Liao, Yuncheng, 2022. "Optimizing the ridge–furrow ratio and nitrogen application rate can increase the grain yield and water use efficiency of rain-fed spring maize in the Loess Plateau region of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    18. Zhang, Tibin & Zou, Yufeng & Kisekka, Isaya & Biswas, Asim & Cai, Huanjie, 2021. "Comparison of different irrigation methods to synergistically improve maize’s yield, water productivity and economic benefits in an arid irrigation area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    19. Lian, Yanhao & Ali, Shahzad & Zhang, Xudong & Wang, Tianlu & Liu, Qi & Jia, Qianmin & Jia, Zhikuan & Han, Qingfang, 2016. "Nutrient and tillage strategies to increase grain yield and water use efficiency in semi-arid areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 137-147.
    20. Zbigniew Gołaś, 2022. "Changes in Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions of the Agricultural Sector in Poland from 2000 to 2019," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:2005-:d:1260305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.