IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/2326.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The myth of parity of esteem: earnings and qualifications

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson, Peter

Abstract

There is no parity of esteem between academic and vocational qualifications in the labour market. Data from the Labour Force Survey show that on average men and women working full-time with academic qualifications at one level in the national qualifications framework earn about the same as men and women with vocational qualifications set notionally one level higher. So those with A levels have earnings similar to those with higher or level 4 vocational qualifications, those with 5 or more O levels or higher grade GCSEs have earnings similar to those with level 3 vocational qualifications, and those with 1-4 O levels or higher grade GCSEs have earnings similar to those with level 2 vocational qualifications. These higher earnings occur firstly because academic qualifications at a given level are more successful in buying access to more highly paid occupations. Secondly, within the most highly paid managerial, professional and technical occupations, academic qualifications are associated with higher earnings. These findings raise significant issues for public policy, calling into question the way in which the UK's National Targets for Education and Training have been formulated and much work on international comparisons of educational attainment.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, Peter, 1997. "The myth of parity of esteem: earnings and qualifications," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 2326, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:2326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2326/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gavan Conlon & Sophie Hedges & Pietro Patrignani, 2018. "Settling the counterfactual debate: Is there a preferable counterfactual when estimating the returns to vocational qualifications?," CVER Research Papers 013, Centre for Vocational Education Research.
    2. Colin Lindsay & Garry Sturgeon, 2003. "Local Responses to Longterm Unemployment: Delivering Access to Employment in Edinburgh," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 18(2), pages 159-173, May.
    3. Brunello, Giorgio & Rocco, Lorenzo, 2015. "The Labour Market Effects of Academic and Vocational Education over the Life Cycle: Evidence from Two British Cohorts," IZA Discussion Papers 9275, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. P Rudd & Hilary Steedman, 1997. "GCSE Grades and GNVQ Outcomes: Results of a Pilot Study," CEP Discussion Papers dp0366, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. repec:cep:cepisp:is03 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Erich Battistin & Barbara Sianesi, 2006. "Misreported schooling and returns to education: evidence from the UK," CeMMAP working papers CWP07/06, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    7. Martina Dieckhoff, 2008. "Skills and occupational attainment: a comparative study of Germany, Denmark and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 22(1), pages 89-108, March.
    8. Anne Gasteen & John Houston, 2007. "Employability and Earnings Returns to Qualifications in Scotland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 443-452.
    9. Chiara Cavaglia & Sandra McNally & Guglielmo Ventura, 2020. "Do Apprenticeships Pay? Evidence for England," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(5), pages 1094-1134, October.
    10. Dearden, Lorraine, et al, 2002. "The Returns to Academic and Vocational Qualifications in Britain," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(3), pages 249-274, July.
    11. Gavan Conlon, 2001. "The incidence and outcomes associated with the late attainment of qualifications in the United Kingdom," CEE Discussion Papers 0013, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.
    12. Gavan Conlon, 2002. "The Determinants of Undertaking Academic and Vocational Qualifications in the UK," CEE Discussion Papers 0020, Centre for the Economics of Education, LSE.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • J00 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:2326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.