IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/119522.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Professions and inequality: challenges, controversies, and opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley, Louise
  • Boussebaa, Mehdi
  • Friedman, Sam
  • Harrington, Brooke
  • Heusinkveld, Stefan
  • Gustafsson, Stefanie
  • Muzio, Daniel

Abstract

On the basis of the EGOS 2021 sub-plenary on 'Professions and Inequality: Challenges, Controversies, and Opportunities', the presenters and panellists wrote four short essays on the relationship between inequality as a grand challenge and professional occupations and organizations, their structures, practices, and strategies. Individually, these essays take an inquisitorial stance on extant understandings of (1) how professions may exacerbate existing inequalities and (2) how professions can be part of the solution and help tackle inequality as a grand challenge. Taken together, the discussion forum aims at advancing scholarly debates on inequality by showing how professions' scholarship may critically interrogate extant understandings of inequality as a broad, multifaceted concept, whilst providing fruitful directions for research on inequality, their potential solutions, and the role and responsibilities of organization and management scholars.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley, Louise & Boussebaa, Mehdi & Friedman, Sam & Harrington, Brooke & Heusinkveld, Stefan & Gustafsson, Stefanie & Muzio, Daniel, 2023. "Professions and inequality: challenges, controversies, and opportunities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119522, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119522
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/119522/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedman, Sam, 2022. "(Not) bringing your whole self to work: the gendered experience of upward mobility in the UK Civil Service," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113417, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Andreas Giazitzoglu & Daniel Muzio, 2021. "Learning the rules of the game: How is corporate masculinity learned and enacted by male professionals from nonprivileged backgrounds?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 67-84, January.
    3. Suddaby, Roy & Saxton, Gregory D. & Gunz, Sally, 2015. "Twittering change: The institutional work of domain change in accounting expertise," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 52-68.
    4. Arnold, Patricia J., 2005. "Disciplining domestic regulation: the World Trade Organization and the market for professional services," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 299-330, May.
    5. Prem Sikka & Mark P. Hampton, 2005. "The role of accountancy firms in tax avoidance: Some evidence and issues," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 325-343, September.
    6. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2015-2235 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. J V Beaverstock & P J Taylor & R G Smith, 1999. "The Long Arm of the Law: London's Law Firms in a Globalising World Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(10), pages 1857-1876, October.
    8. Toft, Maren & Friedman, Sam, 2020. "Family wealth and the class ceiling: the propulsive power of the bank of Mum and Dad," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 105198, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Boussebaa, Mehdi, 2015. "Control in the multinational enterprise: The polycentric case of global professional service firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 696-703.
    10. Chris Carter & Crawford Spence & Daniel Muzio, 2015. "Scoping an agenda for future research into the professions," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(8), pages 1198-1216, October.
    11. Daniel Muzio & David M. Brock & Roy Suddaby, 2013. "Professions and Institutional Change: Towards an Institutionalist Sociology of the Professions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(5), pages 699-721, July.
    12. Chris Carter & Crawford Spence & Daniel Muzio, 2015. "Scoping an agenda for future research into the professions," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(8), pages 1198-1216, October.
    13. Nicola Ingram & Sol Gamsu, 2022. "Talking the Talk of Social Mobility: The Political Performance of a Misguided Agenda," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(1), pages 189-206, March.
    14. Louise Ashley, 2022. "Organisational Social Mobility Programmes as Mechanisms of Power and Control," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 427-444, June.
    15. Sam Friedman, 2022. "(Not) bringing your whole self to work: The gendered experience of upward mobility in the UK Civil Service," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 502-519, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mehdi Boussebaa, 2024. "The Big Con: how the consulting industry weakens our businesses, infantilizes our governments and warps our economies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(1), pages 121-123, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brock, David M. & Hydle, Katja Maria, 2018. "Transnationality – Sharpening the Integration-Responsiveness vision in global professional firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 117-124.
    2. Aburous, Dina, 2019. "IFRS and institutional work in the accounting domain," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Friedman, Sam, 2022. "Climbing the velvet drainpipe: class background and career progression within the UK Civil Service," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117861, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Lilith A. Whiley & Ashley Wright & Sarah E. Stutterheim & Gina Grandy, 2023. "“A part of being a woman, really”: Menopause at work as “dirty” femininity," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 897-916, May.
    5. Everett, Jeff & Shiraz Rahaman, Abu & Neu, Dean & Saxton, Gregory, 2024. "Letters to the editor, institutional experimentation, and the public accounting professional," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Nicole Gillespie & Mattia Anesa & Morgana Lizzio-Wilson & Cassandra Chapman & Karen Healy & Matthew Hornsey, 2024. "How do Sector Level Factors Influence Trust Violations in Not-for-Profit Organizations? A Multilevel Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(2), pages 373-398, May.
    7. Yuliani Suseno & Ashly H. Pinnington, 2018. "Building social capital and human capital for internationalization: The role of network ties and knowledge resources," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1081-1106, December.
    8. Markard, Jochen & Erlinghagen, Sabine, 2017. "Technology users and standardization: Game changing strategies in the field of smart meter technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 226-235.
    9. Mike W. Peng, 2019. "Global competition and diffusion of the “A” list," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Mihret, Dessalegn Getie & Mirshekary, Soheila & Yaftian, Ali, 2020. "Accounting professionalization, the state, and transnational capitalism: The case of Iran," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. Timothy Hoff, 2021. "Covid‐19 and The Study of Professionals and Professional Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1395-1399, July.
    12. Tim Hallett & Matthew Gougherty, 2024. "Learning to Think Like an Economist without Becoming One: Ambivalent Reproduction and Policy Couplings in a Masters of Public Affairs Program," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(2), pages 227-255, April.
    13. AnnMarie Bennett & Breda Murphy, 2017. "The Tax Profession: Tax Avoidance and the Public Interest," Economics Department Working Paper Series n286-17.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    14. Maxim Voronov & Mary Ann Glynn & Klaus Weber, 2022. "Under the Radar: Institutional Drift and Non‐Strategic Institutional Change," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 819-842, May.
    15. Suddaby, Roy & Cooper, David J. & Greenwood, Royston, 2007. "Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 333-362.
    16. Jeff Everett & Constance Friesen & Dean Neu & Abu Shiraz Rahaman, 2018. "We Have Never Been Secular: Religious Identities, Duties, and Ethics in Audit Practice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 1121-1142, December.
    17. Simson, Rebecca & Mahmoudzadeh, Mina, 2024. "Inherited wealth in post-apartheid South Africa: new perspectives from probate records," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 125939, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Christal Lane & Margaret Potton & Wolfgang Littek, 2000. "The Professions Between State and Market: A Cross-National Study of Convergence and Divergence," Working Papers wp189, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    19. Edouard Ribes, 2021. "What is the effect of labor displacement on management consultants?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-22, February.
    20. Masashi Goto, 2020. "Theorization of Institutional Change in the Rise of Artificial Intelligence," Discussion Paper Series DP2020-12, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    inequality; Professional Services Firms; professions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J50 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:119522. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.