IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ehl/lserod/118948.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Competitive screening of customers with non-common priors

Author

Listed:
  • Uthemann, Andreas

Abstract

This paper provides an explanation for the variety of contracts offered by competitive firms for seemingly identical products or services. I show that two competing firms offering menus of non-linear price schedules to customers with biased beliefs about their future demand will be able to screen these customers on the basis of their priors. Firms' use of menus of tariffs can thus be understood as screening devices for boundedly rational consumers. However, while such menus allow firms to screen their customers according to their ability to correctly forecast future demand, they do not allow them to extract additional rents provided the market is sufficiently competitive and firms' have identical priors concerning their customers' types. Sufficiently strong competition guarantees that each tariff only covers the fixed costs of the firm. Competition between firms however cannot remedy the bias in consumers' beliefs about their future demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Uthemann, Andreas, 2017. "Competitive screening of customers with non-common priors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118948, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • Handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:118948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/118948/
    File Function: Open access version.
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bliss, Christopher, 1988. "A Theory of Retail Pricing," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 375-391, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Martimort & Jerome Pouyet, 2024. "Promotional Allowances: Loss Leading as an Incentive Device," Working Papers halshs-04684854, HAL.
    2. Rhodes, Andrew, 2011. "Multiproduct pricing and the Diamond Paradox," MPRA Paper 32511, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Howard Smith & Simon Latcovich, 2000. "Sinking the Internet: Pricing, Sunk Costs, and Market Structure Online," Economics Series Working Papers 36, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    4. Ge, Houtian & Gomez, Miguel I. & Richards, Timothy J., 2018. "Retailer Marketing Strategy and Consumer Purchase Decision for Local Food – An Agent-Based Model," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273819, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Sandro Shelegia & Chris M Wilson, 2014. "A Utility-Based Model of Sales with Informative Advertising," Discussion Paper Series 2014_09, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Oct 2014.
    6. Lahmandi-Ayed, Rim, 2010. "Spatial differentiation, divisible consumption and the pro-competitive effect of income," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 71-85, January.
    7. David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet, 2024. "Promotional Allowances: Loss Leading as an Incentive Device," Working Papers hal-04758824, HAL.
    8. Paul B. Ellickson & Sanjog Misra, 2008. "Supermarket Pricing Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 811-828, 09-10.
    9. Timothy Richards, 2007. "A nested logit model of strategic promotion," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 63-91, March.
    10. Johansen, Bjørn Olav, 2012. "The Buyer Power Of Multiproduct Retailers: Competition With One-Stop Shopping," Working Papers in Economics 03/12, University of Bergen, Department of Economics.
    11. David Mills, 2007. "Quasi-Partnerships in Distribution," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 31(3), pages 155-168, November.
    12. Jia Niu & Shanshan Jin & Ge Chen & Xianhui Geng, 2024. "How Can Price Promotions Make Consumers More Interested? An Empirical Study from a Chinese Supermarket," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Zhijun Chen & Patrick Rey, 2012. "Loss Leading as an Exploitative Practice," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(7), pages 3462-3482, December.
    14. Bodo E. Steiner, 2004. "Australian wines in the British wine market: A hedonic price analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(3), pages 287-307.
    15. de Cornière, Alexandre & Taylor, Greg, 2022. "Data and Competition: a Simple Framework with Applications to Mergers and Market Structure," CEPR Discussion Papers 14446, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Noriaki Matsushima & Akira Miyaoka, 2013. "Who benefits from resale-below-cost laws?," ISER Discussion Paper 0875, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    17. Roger Bolton, 1992. "'Place Prosperity vs People Prosperity' Revisited: An Old Issue with a New Angle," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(2), pages 185-203, April.
    18. Allain Marie-Laure & Chambolle Claire, 2005. "Loss-Leaders Banning Laws as Vertical Restraints," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, February.
    19. Alessandro Bonanno & Rigoberto A. Lopez, 2007. "Competition Effects of Supermarket Services," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(3), pages 555-568.
    20. Rühl, Christian, 2016. "Size and welfare costs of price differences across European countries," CFS Working Paper Series 535, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • L11 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure; Size Distribution of Firms

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ehl:lserod:118948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LSERO Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.