IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1884r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing

Author

Listed:
  • Johar, Gita V.

    (Columbia U)

  • Sengupta, Jaideep

    (Hong Kong U of Science and Technology)

  • Aaker, Jennifer L.

    (Stanford U)

Abstract

This research examines the dynamic process of inference updating. We present a framework that delineates two mechanisms that guide the updating of personality trait inferences about brands. The results of three experiments show that chronics (those for whom the trait is accessible) update their initial inferences based on the trait implications of new information. Interestingly, nonchronics (those for whom the trait is not accessible) also update their initial inferences, but do so based on the evaluative implications of new information. The framework adds to the inference making literature by uncovering two distinct paths of inference-updating and highlighting the moderating role of trait accessibility. The findings have direct implications for marketers seeking to understand the construction of brand personality, and highlight the constantly evolving nature of brand perceptions, as well as the notion that both the consumer and the marketer have important roles to play in this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Johar, Gita V. & Sengupta, Jaideep & Aaker, Jennifer L., 2005. "Two Roads to Updating Brand Personality Impressions: Trait versus Evaluative Inferencing," Research Papers 1884r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1884r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP1884R.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sengupta, Jaideep & Goodstein, Ronald C & Boninger, David S, 1997. "All Cues Are Not Created Equal: Obtaining Attitude Persistence under Low-Involvement Conditions," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 23(4), pages 351-361, March.
    2. Sengupta, Jaideep & Johar, Gita Venkataramani, 2002. "Effects of Inconsistent Attribute Information on the Predictive Value of Product Attitudes: Toward a Resolution of Opposing Perspectives," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(1), pages 39-56, June.
    3. Kardes, Frank R, 1986. "Effects of Initial Product Judgments on Subsequent Memory-Based Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Consumers and Their Brands: Developing Relationship Theory in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 24(4), pages 343-373, March.
    5. Aaker, Jennifer & Benet-Martinez, Veronica & Garolera, Jordi, 2001. "Consumption Symbols as Carriers of Culture: A Study of Japanese and Spanish Brand Personality Constructs," Research Papers 1668r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. ter Braak, Anne & Geyskens, Inge & Dekimpe, Marnik G., 2014. "Taking private labels upmarket: Empirical generalizations on category drivers of premium private label introductions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 125-140.
    2. Frauke Sander & Ulrich Föhl & Nadine Walter & Vera Demmer, 2021. "Green or social? An analysis of environmental and social sustainability advertising and its impact on brand personality, credibility and attitude," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 429-445, July.
    3. Tischer, Sven, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-064, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    4. Oana Țugulea, 2017. "City Brand Personality—Relations with Dimensions and Dimensions Inter-Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Gonçalves, Joana & Guerreiro, Manuela & Mendes, Júlio & Pereira, Luís, 2018. "Events Brand Personality: Insights From Music Festivals In Portugal," Journal of Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, Cinturs - Research Centre for Tourism, Sustainability and Well-being, University of Algarve, vol. 6(3), pages 326-343.
    6. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2012-064 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Linkages of retailer awareness, retailer association, retailer perceived quality and retailer loyalty with purchase intention: A study of Indian food retail brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 284-292.
    8. Pechtl, Hans & Heidarian, Elham, 2016. "Can a cause-related brand be perceived different from other brands?," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 02/2016, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.
    9. Yi Xie & Siqing Peng & Daniel P. Hampson, 0. "Brand user imagery clarity (BUIC): conceptualization, measurement, and consequences," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-17.
    10. Geuens, Maggie & Weijters, Bert & De Wulf, Kristof, 2009. "A new measure of brand personality," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 97-107.
    11. Das, Gopal, 2014. "Impacts of retail brand personality and self-congruity on store loyalty: The moderating role of gender," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 130-138.
    12. Smit, Edith & Bronner, Fred & Tolboom, Maarten, 2007. "Brand relationship quality and its value for personal contact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(6), pages 627-633, June.
    13. Avis, Mark, 2012. "Brand personality factor based models: A critical review," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 89-96.
    14. Vytautas Dikcius & Eleonora Seimiene & Ramunas Casas, 2018. "Brand Personality Scale: Is It Applicable For A Small Emerging Country?," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(2).
    15. Strizhakova, Yuliya & Coulter, Robin A. & Price, Linda L., 2008. "The meanings of branded products: A cross-national scale development and meaning assessment," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 82-93.
    16. Cruz Tarrillo, Jose Joel & Haro Zea, Karla Liliana & Soria Quijaite, Juan Jesús, 2022. "Revisión sistemática: situación actual de la personalidad de marca para el posicionamiento estratégico," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 23(1), pages 315-340, January.
    17. Tiphaine Gorlier & Géraldine Michel, 2020. "How special rewards in loyalty programs enrich consumer–brand relationships: The role of self‐expansion," Post-Print hal-02494605, HAL.
    18. Viktoria Maria Radler, 2018. "20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 370-383, July.
    19. Imene Becheur & Oula Bayarassou & Hela Ghrib, 2017. "Beyond Brand Personality: Building Consumer–Brand Emotional Relationship," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(3_suppl), pages 128-144, June.
    20. Nobre, Helena & Simões, Cláudia, 2019. "NewLux Brand Relationship Scale: Capturing the scope of mass-consumed luxury brand relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 328-338.
    21. Müller, Brigitte & Kocher, Bruno & Crettaz, Antoine, 2013. "The effects of visual rejuvenation through brand logos," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 82-88.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1884r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.