IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1620.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exploring the Impact of Marketing and Manufacturing Strategies, Conflict, and Morale on Business Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Hausman, Warren H.

    (Stanford U)

  • Montgomery, David B.

    (Stanford U)

  • Roth, Aleda V.

    (U of North Carolina)

Abstract

As firms are increasingly transforming their organizations in response to environmental pressures and hypercompetition, the traditional sequence of manufacturing and marketing (hereafter M/M) strategy formulation and implementation is undergoing scrutiny. Questions are being raised about how to gain interfunctional cooperation, how to manage interfunctional conflicts and whether or not the quality of the M/M interface contributes to business performance. In this exploratory investigation of the M/M interface, we propose a model for assessing the quality of this interface and construct a theoretical framework to test it using structural equation modeling (SEM) techniques. In our model, we introduce the notion of manufacturing orientation, which, like the well-documented market orientation, captures the subjective reality of the importance of manufacturing strategy in executing business strategy and managing the balance of manufacturing with marketing. Our model includes predisposing factors (antecedents) and performance outcomes (consequences), which are expected to influence or be influenced by the quality of the M/M interface. We find that M/M harmony and intergroup conflict are distinct but related theoretical constructs that define the quality of the M/M interface. Contrary to conventional wisdom, an increased emphasis on the importance of marketing and manufacturing strategy improves the functions' ability to work together, which in turn favorably influences the firm's competitive position and profit performance. In contrast, emphasis on manufacturing strategy is unrelated to intergroup conflict, while tentative results indicate that an increase in marketing strategy emphasis reduced interfunctional conflict. Higher levels of M/M strategic emphasis also contribute to improved morale. Furthermore, the overall quality of the management team is found to be the most important contributor to profit performance. This study provides empirical evidence that the behavioral or "soft" side of manufacturing strategy merits attention in future research, especially regarding influences on the quality of M/M interface.

Suggested Citation

  • Hausman, Warren H. & Montgomery, David B. & Roth, Aleda V., 2000. "Exploring the Impact of Marketing and Manufacturing Strategies, Conflict, and Morale on Business Performance," Research Papers 1620, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/rp1620.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimberly A. Bates & Susan D. Amundson & Roger G. Schroeder & William T. Morris, 1995. "The Crucial Interrelationship Between Manufacturing Strategy and Organizational Culture," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1565-1580, October.
    2. Webster, Frederick Jr., 1988. "The rediscovery of the marketing concept," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 29-39.
    3. Morris A. Cohen & Jehoshua Eliasberg & Teck-Hua Ho, 1996. "New Product Development: The Performance and Time-to-Market Tradeoff," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 173-186, February.
    4. Griffin, Abbie. & Hauser, John R. & Griffin, Abbie, 1994. "Integrating R&D and marketing : a review and analysis of the literature," Working papers #112-94. Working paper (S, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    5. Jeffrey G. Miller & Aleda V. Roth, 1994. "A Taxonomy of Manufacturing Strategies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 285-304, March.
    6. Roth, Aleda V. & Miller, Jeffrey G., 1992. "Success factors in manufacturing," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 73-81.
    7. Caron H. St. John & Leslie W. Rue, 1991. "Research notes and communications co‐ordinating mechanisms, consensus between marketing and manufacturing groups, and marketplace performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(7), pages 549-555, October.
    8. Slater, Stanley F. & Narver, John C., 1994. "Market orientation, customer value, and superior performance," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 22-28.
    9. Fornell, Claes, 1983. "Issues in the Application of Covariance Structure Analysis: A Comment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(4), pages 443-448, March.
    10. Cagli, Ugur, 1984. "Nested model comparison with structural equation approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 309-318, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montgomery, David B. & Roth, Aleda V. & Hausmann, Warren H., 2001. "Why Should Marketing and Manufacturing Work Together? Some Exploratory Empirical," Research Papers 1706, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    2. Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas & Aleksandr Ostapenko, 2016. "Return, reliability and risk as a proactive set of concepts in developing an efficient integration strategy of companies," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 201-214, April.
    3. Zhang, Xiang & Ye, Chen & Chen, Rongqiu & Wang, Zhaohua, 2011. "Multi-focused strategy in value co-creation with customers: Examining cumulative development pattern with new capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 122-130, July.
    4. Tomás F. Espino-Rodríguez, 2016. "How hotels compete on the basis of competitive priorities and their relationship with infrastructural and structural decisions," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 737-773, December.
    5. Rehme, Sarina & Rennhak, Carsten, 2011. "Marketing and sales: Successful peacekeeping," Reutlingen Working Papers on Marketing & Management 2011-11, Reutlingen University, ESB Business School.
    6. Aleda V. Roth, 2007. "Applications of Empirical Science in Manufacturing and Service Operations," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 353-367.
    7. Pacheco, Diego Augusto de Jesus & Antunes Junior, José Antonio Valle & de Matos, Celso Augusto, 2021. "The constraints of theory: What is the impact of the Theory of Constraints on Operations Strategy?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    8. Jones, Eli & Busch, Paul & Dacin, Peter, 2003. "Firm market orientation and salesperson customer orientation: interpersonal and intrapersonal influences on customer service and retention in business-to-business buyer-seller relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 323-340, April.
    9. Niccolo' Gordini, 2010. "Market-Driven Management: A Critical Literature Review," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, Niccolò Cusano University, issue 2 Intangi.
    10. Lau Antonio, K.W. & Yam, Richard C.M. & Tang, Esther, 2007. "The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. Silvio M. Brondoni & Margherita Corniani & Sabina Riboldazzi, 2013. "Global Retailers, Market-Driven Management and Innovation," The International Journal of Economic Behavior - IJEB, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 3(1), pages 27-40, December.
    12. Avella, Lucia & Fernandez, Esteban & Vazquez, Camilo J., 2001. "Analysis of manufacturing strategy as an explanatory factor of competitiveness in the large Spanish industrial firm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 139-157, July.
    13. Shekhar Jayanthi & Aleda V. Roth & Mehmet M. Kristal & Lauren Carter-Roth Venu, 2009. "Strategic Resource Dynamics of Manufacturing Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1060-1076, June.
    14. Zhou, Honggeng & Shou, Yongyi & Zhai, Xin & Li, Ling & Wood, Craig & Wu, Xiaobo, 2014. "Supply chain practice and information quality: A supply chain strategy study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PC), pages 624-633.
    15. Lii, Peirchyi & Kuo, Fang-I, 2016. "Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 142-155.
    16. Arana-Solares, Iván Andrés & Ortega-Jiménez, César H. & Alfalla-Luque, Rafaela & Pérez-Díez de los Ríos, José Luis, 2019. "Contextual factors intervening in the manufacturing strategy and technology management-performance relationship," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 81-95.
    17. Zhang, XiaoLi & Liu, ChenGuang & Li, WenJuan & Evans, Steve & Yin, Yong, 2017. "Effects of key enabling technologies for seru production on sustainable performance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 290-307.
    18. Guilding, Chris & McManus, Lisa, 2002. "The incidence, perceived merit and antecedents of customer accounting: an exploratory note," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 45-59.
    19. Faiz Muhammad Khuwaja & Waheed Ali Umrani & Sanober Salman Shaikh & Ammar Ahmed & Sanaullah Shar, 2019. "University Markor: A Context-Specific Scale to Measure Market-Orientation in Universities," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, June.
    20. Rebolledo, Claudia & Jobin, Marie-Hélène, 2013. "Manufacturing and supply alignment: Are different manufacturing strategies linked to different purchasing practices?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 219-226.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.