IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/clt/sswopa/1153.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finding All Equilibria

Author

Listed:
  • Echenique, Federico

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Echenique, Federico, 2002. "Finding All Equilibria," Working Papers 1153, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:clt:sswopa:1153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/SSPapers/sswp1153c.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Huyck, John B & Battalio, Raymond C & Beil, Richard O, 1990. "Tacit Coordination Games, Strategic Uncertainty, and Coordination Failure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(1), pages 234-248, March.
    2. Von Stengel, Bernhard, 2002. "Computing equilibria for two-person games," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 45, pages 1723-1759, Elsevier.
    3. Bernhard von Stengel & Antoon van den Elzen & Dolf Talman, 2002. "Computing Normal Form Perfect Equilibria for Extensive Two-Person Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 693-715, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Echenique, Federico, 2004. "A characterization of strategic complementarities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 325-347, February.
    2. Echenique, Federico, 2007. "Finding all equilibria in games of strategic complements," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 514-532, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernhard von Stengel & Antoon van den Elzen & Dolf Talman, 2002. "Computing Normal Form Perfect Equilibria for Extensive Two-Person Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(2), pages 693-715, March.
    2. Naouel Yousfi-Halimi & Mohammed Said Radjef & Hachem Slimani, 2018. "Refinement of pure Pareto Nash equilibria in finite multicriteria games using preference relations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 607-628, August.
    3. Rahul Savani & Bernhard von Stengel, 2016. "Unit vector games," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 12(1), pages 7-27, March.
    4. Bade, Sophie & Haeringer, Guillaume & Renou, Ludovic, 2007. "More strategies, more Nash equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 551-557, July.
    5. Peixuan Li & Chuangyin Dang & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2024. "Computing perfect stationary equilibria in stochastic games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(2), pages 347-387, September.
    6. Hausken, Kjell, 2008. "Strategic defense and attack for reliability systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1740-1750.
    7. Rahul Savani & Bernhard Stengel, 2015. "Game Theory Explorer: software for the applied game theorist," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 5-33, January.
    8. Yiyin Cao & Chuangyin Dang & Yabin Sun, 2022. "Complementarity Enhanced Nash’s Mappings and Differentiable Homotopy Methods to Select Perfect Equilibria," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 533-563, February.
    9. Stuart McDonald & Liam Wagner, 2013. "A Stochastic Search Algorithm for the Computation of Perfect and Proper Equilibria," Discussion Papers Series 480, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    10. Echenique, Federico, 2007. "Finding all equilibria in games of strategic complements," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 514-532, July.
    11. Herings, P. Jean-Jacques & Peeters, Ronald J. A. P., 2004. "Stationary equilibria in stochastic games: structure, selection, and computation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 32-60, September.
    12. Bharat Adsul & Jugal Garg & Ruta Mehta & Milind Sohoni & Bernhard von Stengel, 2021. "Fast Algorithms for Rank-1 Bimatrix Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 613-631, March.
    13. Yukio KORIYAMA & Matias Nunez, 2014. "Hybrid Procedures," THEMA Working Papers 2014-02, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    14. Huppmann, Daniel & Siddiqui, Sauleh, 2018. "An exact solution method for binary equilibrium problems with compensation and the power market uplift problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 622-638.
    15. Stuart McDonald & Liam Wagner, 2010. "The Computation of Perfect and Proper Equilibrium for Finite Games via Simulated Annealing," Risk & Uncertainty Working Papers WPR10_1, Risk and Sustainable Management Group, University of Queensland, revised Apr 2010.
    16. Etessami, Kousha, 2021. "The complexity of computing a (quasi-)perfect equilibrium for an n-player extensive form game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 107-140.
    17. Bernhard von Stengel & Françoise Forges, 2008. "Extensive-Form Correlated Equilibrium: Definition and Computational Complexity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1002-1022, November.
    18. Cao, Yiyin & Dang, Chuangyin & Xiao, Zhongdong, 2022. "A differentiable path-following method to compute subgame perfect equilibria in stationary strategies in robust stochastic games and its applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1032-1050.
    19. Chen, Yin & Dang, Chuangyin, 2020. "An extension of quantal response equilibrium and determination of perfect equilibrium," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 659-670.
    20. Conitzer, Vincent & Sandholm, Tuomas, 2008. "New complexity results about Nash equilibria," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 621-641, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:clt:sswopa:1153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victoria Mason (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.hss.caltech.edu/ss .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.