IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/97s-10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Global Strategic Benchmarking, Critical Capabilities and Performance of Aerospace Subcontractors

Author

Listed:
  • Élisabeth Lefebvre
  • Louis A. Lefebvre

Abstract

The aerospace industry faces fierce and rapidly changing competition worldwide which exercises a considerable amount of strain on its manufacturing subcontractors. In this context, it becomes essential to gain a better understanding of what constitutes the most critical capabilities of the world-class subcontractors. Drawing heavily on the concept of benchmarking and of fit as profile deviation, this paper allows to identify the most critical capabilities of the best performing firms. Results are derived from an international comparison of 384 subcontracting firms operating in the U.S.A., the U.K. and Canada. A very distinct profile emerges from the best subcontractors in terms of their acquired technological and managerial capabilities. The most critical capabilities which are common to subcontractors of all three countries are either intangible, difficult to imitate or not easily transferable. This leads us to believe that the best subcontractors hold a partcular competitive advantage which will be difficult for others to replicate, at least in the short term. This is not however the case for the less performing subcontractors who could well be subjected in the not too far future to the competitive pressures arising from the new industrializing countries. L'industrie aérospatiale est aux prises avec une concurrence intense à l'échelle mondiale, notamment avec la venue de nouveaux concurrents de la région Asie-Pacifique. Cette situation impose une pression supplémentaire sur la sous-traitance actuelle dans ce secteur. Dans ce contexte, il apparaît essentiel de mieux comprendre ce qui caractérise les sous-traitants de classe mondiale. Pour répondre à cette préoccupation, une étude comparative de 384 entreprises sous-traitantes fut réalisée aux États-Unis, au Royaume-Uni, et au Canada, en faisant appel au concept de benchmarking et à une des perspectives d'alignement retrouvée dans la théorie de la contingence connue sous le nom de déviation du profil idéal. Un profil distinct semble émerger en ce qui a trait aux compétences technologiques et managériales détenues par les entreprises les plus performantes. Les compétences critiques qui sont communes aux entreprises sous-traitantes de classe mondiale provenant des trois pays sont intangibles, difficiles à imiter, ou difficiliment transférables. Ceci laisse entrevoir que les sous-traitants actuels de calibre international possèdent des compétences qui seront difficilement reproductibles dans le cours terme. Ce ne serait pas le cas pour les sous-traitants moins performants qui seront aux prises dans un avenir prochain avec la venue de nouveaux concurrents en provenance des pays en voie d'industrialisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Élisabeth Lefebvre & Louis A. Lefebvre, 1997. "Global Strategic Benchmarking, Critical Capabilities and Performance of Aerospace Subcontractors," CIRANO Working Papers 97s-10, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:97s-10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/97s-10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcel Boyer, 1997. "Competition and Access in Telecoms: ECPR, Global Price Cap, and Auctions," CIRANO Working Papers 97s-03, CIRANO.
    2. N. Venkatraman & John E. Prescott, 1990. "Environment‐strategy coalignment: An empirical test of its performance implications," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guffarth, Daniel & Barber, Michael J., 2014. "Network evolution, success, and regional development in the European aerospace industry," FZID Discussion Papers 96-2014, University of Hohenheim, Center for Research on Innovation and Services (FZID).
    2. Christophe CARRINCAZEAUX (e3i-IFReDE-GRES) & Vincent FRIGANT (e3i-IFReDE-GRES), 2006. "The internationalisation of the French aerospace industry in the 1990s: a break with the past? (In French)," Cahiers du GRES (2002-2009) 2006-15, Groupement de Recherches Economiques et Sociales.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    2. Yi-Chi Hsiao & Hsueh-Liang Wu & Chun-Ping Yeh, 2023. "An investigation of the bridging interface strategies used by Chinese MNE when undertaking FDI to Taiwan," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(4), pages 1485-1512, September.
    3. Luo, Yadong & Tan, J. Justin, 1998. "A comparison of multinational and domestic firms in an emerging market: A strategic choice perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 21-40, July.
    4. Bergeron, François & Raymond, Louis & Rivard, Suzanne, 2001. "Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 125-142, April.
    5. Farzana Chowdhury & David B. Audretsch, 2021. "A dynamic relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial activity," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 339-356, September.
    6. Huo, Baofeng & Ye, Yuxiao & Zhao, Xiande, 2015. "The impacts of trust and contracts on opportunism in the 3PL industry: The moderating role of demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PA), pages 160-170.
    7. Yongqiang Gao, 2008. "Institutional Environment and MNEs’ Strategy in Transitional China," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 6(1), pages 5-21.
    8. Alfredo De Massis & Josip Kotlar & Mike Wright & Franz W. Kellermanns, 2018. "Sector-Based Entrepreneurial Capabilities and the Promise of Sector Studies in Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-23, January.
    9. Dirk Clercq & Narongsak Thongpapanl & Maxim Voronov, 2018. "Sustainability in the Face of Institutional Adversity: Market Turbulence, Network Embeddedness, and Innovative Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 437-455, March.
    10. Benoit Aubert & Michel Patry & Suzanne Rivard, 1997. "La régie des services informatiques : Le rôle de la mesure et des compétences dans les décisions d'impartition," CIRANO Working Papers 97s-04, CIRANO.
    11. Horatio M. Morgan & Sui Sui & Shavin Malhotra, 2021. "No place like home: The effect of exporting to the country of origin on the financial performance of immigrant-owned SMEs," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(3), pages 504-524, April.
    12. Yu Li & Yan A. Zhang & Wei Shi, 2020. "Navigating geographic and cultural distances in international expansion: The paradoxical roles of firm size, age, and ownership," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 921-949, May.
    13. Sriram Thirumalai & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 2013. "To Personalize or Not to Personalize Online Purchase Interactions: Implications of Self-Selection by Retailers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 683-708, September.
    14. Xi’na Yuan & Sohyoun Shin & Xinming He & Sang Yong Kim, 2016. "Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(1), pages 32-56, February.
    15. Manu, Franklyn A. & Sriram, Ven, 1996. "Innovation, marketing strategy, environment, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 79-91, January.
    16. Acquaah, Moses, 2009. "International joint venture partner origin, strategic choice, and performance: A comparative analysis in an emerging economy in Africa," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 46-60, March.
    17. Di Vaio, Assunta & Palladino, Rosa & Hassan, Rohail & Escobar, Octavio, 2020. "Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 283-314.
    18. Ping Wang & Joan P. Mileski & Qingcheng Zeng, 2019. "Alignments between strategic content and process structure: the case of container terminal service process automation," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(4), pages 543-558, December.
    19. Antonio K. W. Lau & Stacy H. N. Lee & Sojin Jung, 2018. "The Role of the Institutional Environment in the Relationship between CSR and Operational Performance: An Empirical Study in Korean Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Sini Laari & Juuso Töyli & Lauri Ojala, 2018. "The effect of a competitive strategy and green supply chain management on the financial and environmental performance of logistics service providers," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 872-883, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Aeronautics; subcontractors; critical capabilities; globalization; Aérospatiale; sous-traitance; compétences critiques; globalisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:97s-10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.