IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cir/cirwor/2013s-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vocationalization in the research intensive university

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Crespo
  • Houssine Dridi
  • Marie Lecomte

Abstract

This paper analyses the trends in program creation, modification and abolition/suspension, during a ten year period, of three research intensive universities in Canada: Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and McGill University. The trends observed, by analysing the Minutes of the Commission des études in the case of Francophone universities and the Senate Subcommittee on Teaching and Programs' for McGill University, reveal a tendency toward vocationalization when changes are introduced in the academic programs supply. Data from 25 interviews of professors involved in university-industry collaborative research projects, conducted between April and June of 2007 in McGill University and University of British Columbia show also a tendency towards an utilitarian graduate training. Values of practicality, collaboration, interdisciplinarity and entrepreneurship, resulting from professors' bisectorial and multisectorial collaborations with industry, are passed on to students, particularly graduate students.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Crespo & Houssine Dridi & Marie Lecomte, 2013. "Vocationalization in the research intensive university," CIRANO Working Papers 2013s-16, CIRANO.
  • Handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2013s-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cirano.qc.ca/files/publications/2013s-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven Brint & Mark Riddle & Lori Turk-Bicakci & Charles S. Levy, 2005. "From the Liberal to the Practical Arts in American Colleges and Universities: Organizational Analysis and Curricular Change," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(2), pages 151-180, March.
    2. Teresa Isabelle Daza Campbell & Sheila Slaughter, 1999. "Faculty and Administrators' Attitudes toward Potential Conflicts of Interest, Commitment, and Equity in University-Industry Relationships," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(3), pages 309-352, May.
    3. Christopher C. Morphew, 2009. "Conceptualizing Change in the Institutional Diversity of U.S. Colleges and Universities," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(3), pages 243-269, May.
    4. Svein Kyvik & Terje Bruen Olsen, 2008. "Does the aging of tenured academic staff affect the research performance of universities?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(3), pages 439-455, September.
    5. W. Norton Grubb & Marvin Lazerson, 2005. "Vocationalism in Higher Education: The Triumph of the Education Gospel," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 76(1), pages 1-25, January.
    6. Jain, Sanjay & George, Gerard & Maltarich, Mark, 2009. "Academics or entrepreneurs? Investigating role identity modification of university scientists involved in commercialization activity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 922-935, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dawn Lyken-Segosebe & Tshegofatso Mogotsi & Sakarea Kenewang & Bonolo Montshiwa, 2020. "Stimulating Academic Entrepreneurship through Technology Business Incubation: Lessons for the Incoming Sponsoring University," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(5), pages 1-1, October.
    2. Perkmann, Markus & Tartari, Valentina & McKelvey, Maureen & Autio, Erkko & Broström, Anders & D’Este, Pablo & Fini, Riccardo & Geuna, Aldo & Grimaldi, Rosa & Hughes, Alan & Krabel, Stefan & Kitson, Mi, 2013. "Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 423-442.
    3. Anne Casati & Corine Genet, 2014. "Principal investigators as scientific entrepreneurs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 11-32, February.
    4. Marek Kwiek & Wojciech Roszka, 2022. "Academic vs. biological age in research on academic careers: a large-scale study with implications for scientifically developing systems," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3543-3575, June.
    5. Kuckertz, Andreas & Scheu, Maximilian, 2024. "From chalkboard to boardroom: Unveiling the role of entrepreneurship in bolstering academic achievement among professors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Tommaso Minola & Davide Hahn & Lucio Cassia, 2021. "The relationship between origin and performance of innovative start-ups: the role of technological knowledge at founding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 553-569, February.
    7. Shashwatashish Pattnaik & Nick Mmbaga & T. Daniel White & Rhonda K. Reger, 2024. "To entrepreneur or not to entrepreneur? How identity discrepancies influence enthusiasm for academic entrepreneurship," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1444-1470, August.
    8. Gabriele Puzzo & Maha Yomn Sbaa & Salvatore Zappalà & Luca Pietrantoni, 2023. "Job Expectations and Professional Role Identity in Gambian Journalists: The Mediation Role of Job Satisfaction," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, March.
    9. Simone Scagnelli & Lorenzo Vasile & Mico Apostolov, 2019. "Survival Drivers Of Post-Incubated Start-Ups: The Effect Of Academic Governance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(07), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Annita Nugent & Ho Fai Chan & Uwe Dulleck, 2022. "Government funding of university-industry collaboration: exploring the impact of targeted funding on university patent activity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 29-73, January.
    11. Rahmat Ullah & Rashid Aftab & Saeed Siyal & Kashif Zaheer, 2023. "Entrepreneurial Higher Education Education, Knowledge and Wealth Creation," Papers 2308.08808, arXiv.org.
    12. Svein Kyvik & Ingvild Reymert, 2017. "Research collaboration in groups and networks: differences across academic fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 951-967, November.
    13. Paul Windrum, 2013. "The co-production of health innovations," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Luis Rubalcaba & Paul Windrum (ed.), Public–Private Innovation Networks in Services, chapter 9, pages 228-246, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Llopis, Oscar & D'Este, Pablo & McKelvey, Maureen & Yegros, Alfredo, 2022. "Navigating multiple logics: Legitimacy and the quest for societal impact in science," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    15. Würmseher, Martin, 2017. "To each his own: Matching different entrepreneurial models to the academic scientist's individual needs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-17.
    16. Victoria Wells & Nick Ellis & Richard Slack & Mona Moufahim, 2019. "“It’s Us, You Know, There’s a Feeling of Community”: Exploring Notions of Community in a Consumer Co-operative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 617-635, September.
    17. Pablo D’Este & Irene Ramos-Vielba & Richard Woolley & Nabil Amara, 2018. "How do researchers generate scientific and societal impacts? Toward an analytical and operational framework," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(6), pages 752-763.
    18. Ener, Hakan, 2022. "How does CEO technical expertise influence licensing-out at technology ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Siegel, Donald & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Jennings, P. Devereaux & Xue, Lan, 2023. "Technology transfer from national/federal labs and public research institutes: Managerial and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    20. Audretsch, David & Colombelli, Alessandra & Grilli, Luca & Minola, Tommaso & Rasmussen, Einar, 2020. "Innovative start-ups and policy initiatives," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Vocationalization of higher education; vocational drift; graduate training; market demands; academic programs change; research intensive university;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cir:cirwor:2013s-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ciranca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.