Selection in the Lab: A Network Approach
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- A. Alekseev & Mikhail Freer, 2018. "Selection in the Lab: A Network Approach," Working Papers ECARES 2018-32, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
References listed on IDEAS
- Armin Falk & James J. Heckman, 2009.
"Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences,"
Working Papers
200935, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
- Heckman, James J & Falk, Armin, 2010. "Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences," CEPR Discussion Papers 7620, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Falk, Armin & Heckman, James J., 2009. "Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences," IZA Discussion Papers 4540, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Armin Falk & James J. Heckman, 2009. "Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences," CESifo Working Paper Series 2894, CESifo.
- Johannes Abeler & Daniele Nosenzo, 2015. "Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 195-214, June.
- Alexander W. Cappelen & Knut Nygaard & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2015.
"Social Preferences in the Lab: A Comparison of Students and a Representative Population,"
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 117(4), pages 1306-1326, October.
- Alexander W. Cappelen & Knut Nygaard & Erik Ø. Sørensen & Bertil Tungodden, 2011. "Social Preferences in the Lab: A Comparison of Students and a Representative Population," CESifo Working Paper Series 3511, CESifo.
- Blair Cleave & Nikos Nikiforakis & Robert Slonim, 2013.
"Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(3), pages 372-382, September.
- Cleave, Blair L. & Nikiforakis, Nikos & Slonim, Robert, 2011. "Is There Selection Bias in Laboratory Experiments? The Case of Social and Risk Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 5488, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Nikos Nikiforakis & Blair L. Cleave & Robert Slonim, 2013. "Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences," Post-Print halshs-00943212, HAL.
- Jackson, Matthew O. & López-Pintado, Dunia, 2013.
"Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily,"
Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 49-67, April.
- Matthew O. Jackson & Dunia López Pintado, 2011. "Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily," Working Papers 11.14, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
- JACKSON, Matthew O. & LOPEZ-PINTADO, Dunia, 2012. "Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2012012, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- JACKSON, Matthew O. & LOPEZ-PINTADO, Dunia, 2013. "Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2561, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
- Slonim, Robert & Wang, Carmen & Garbarino, Ellen & Merrett, Danielle, 2012. "Opting-In: Participation Biases in the Lab," IZA Discussion Papers 6865, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Joseph Henrich & Steve J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan, 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?," RatSWD Working Papers 139, German Data Forum (RatSWD).
- Armin Falk & Stephan Meier & Christian Zehnder, 2013. "Do Lab Experiments Misrepresent Social Preferences? The Case Of Self-Selected Student Samples," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(4), pages 839-852, August.
- Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2007.
"What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World?,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 153-174, Spring.
- Steven Levitt & John List, 2007. "What do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World," Artefactual Field Experiments 00480, The Field Experiments Website.
- Slonim, Robert & Wang, Carmen & Garbarino, Ellen & Merrett, Danielle, 2013. "Opting-in: Participation bias in economic experiments," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 43-70.
- Michal Krawczyk, 2011. "What brings your subjects to the lab? A field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 14(4), pages 482-489, November.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martinez, 2019.
"On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 976-1002, March.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro Martinez, 2015. "On the external validity of social-preference games: A systematic lab-field study," Economics Working Papers 1462, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Galizzi, Matteo M. & Navarro-Martínez, Daniel, 2019. "On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84088, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Matteo M. Galizzi & Daniel Navarro-Martínez, 2015. "On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study," Working Papers 802, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Schmidt, Robert & Schwieren, Christiane & Sproten, Alec N., 2020.
"Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 239-255.
- Schmidt, Robert J. & Schwieren, Christiane & Sproten, Alec N., 2019. "Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants," Working Papers 0666, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Schmidt, Robert J. & Schwieren, Christiane & Sproten, Alec N., 2018. "Social Norm Perception in Economic Laboratory Experiments: Inexperienced versus Experienced Participants," Working Papers 0656, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Aurélie Dariel & Nikos Nikiforakis & Jan Stoop, 2020. "Does selection bias cause us to overestimate gender differences in competitiveness?," Working Papers 20200046, New York University Abu Dhabi, Department of Social Science, revised May 2020.
- Johannes Abeler & Daniele Nosenzo, 2015. "Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(2), pages 195-214, June.
- Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019.
"The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of),"
Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
- Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez-Gomez & John List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Artefactual Field Experiments 00648, The Field Experiments Website.
- Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez-Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," NBER Working Papers 25451, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2015.
"Corporate Philanthropy and Productivity: Evidence from an Online Real Effort Experiment,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1795-1811, August.
- Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos, 2014. "Corporate Philanthropy and Productivity: Evidence from an Online Real Effort Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 4778, CESifo.
- Toke R. Fosgaard, 2018. "Cooperation stability: A representative sample in the lab," IFRO Working Paper 2018/08, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
- Thomas Epper & Julien Senn & Ernst Fehr, 2023.
"The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?,"
Working Papers
2023-iRisk-06, IESEG School of Management.
- Ernst Fehr & Thomas Epper & Julien Senn, 2023. "The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?," Working Papers hal-04362826, HAL.
- Epper, Thomas & Senn, Julien & Fehr, Ernst, 2024. "The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?," IZA Discussion Papers 16865, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Thomas Epper & Julien Senn & Ernst Fehr, 2024. "The Missing Type: Where Are the Inequality Averse (Students)?," CESifo Working Paper Series 11009, CESifo.
- Thomas Epper & Julien Senn & Ernst Fehr, 2023.
"Social preferences across subject pools: students vs. general population,"
ECON - Working Papers
435, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jan 2024.
- Thomas Epper & Julien Senn & Ernst Fehr, 2024. "Social Preferences Across Subject Pools: Students vs. General Population," Working Papers 2024-iRisk-01, IESEG School of Management.
- Gruner, Sven & Lehberger, Mira & Hirschauer, Norbert & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2022.
"How (un)informative are experiments with students for other social groups? A study of agricultural students and farmers,"
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(03), January.
- Sven Grüner & Mira Lehberger & Norbert Hirschauer & Oliver Mußhoff, 2022. "How (un)informative are experiments with students for other social groups? A study of agricultural students and farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(3), pages 471-504, July.
- Jonathan Schulz & Uwe Sunde & Petra Thiemann & Christian Thoeni, 2019.
"Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students,"
Discussion Papers
2019-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Schulz, Jonathan & Sunde, Uwe & Thiemann, Petra & Thöni, Christian, 2019. "Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students," Working Papers 2019:18, Lund University, Department of Economics.
- Schulz, Jonathan F. & Sunde, Uwe & Thiemann, Petra & Thöni, Christian, 2019. "Selection into Experiments: Evidence from a Population of Students," IZA Discussion Papers 12807, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Thiemann, Petra & Schulz, Jonathan & Sunde, Uwe & Thöni, Christian, 2022. "Selection into experiments: New evidence on the role of preferences, cognition, and recruitment protocols," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
- Laurent Denant-Boemont & Matthieu Leprince & Matthieu Pourieux, 2019. "Distributive Preferences of Public Representatives: A Field-in-the-Lab Experiment," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2019-05-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.
- Zahra Murad & Charitini Stavropoulou & Graham Cookson, 2019.
"Incentives and gender in a multi-task setting: An experimental study with real-effort tasks,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, March.
- Zahra Murad & Charitini Stavropoulou & Graham Cookson, 2018. "Incentives and Gender in a Multitask Setting: an Experimental Study with Real-Effort Tasks," Working Papers in Economics & Finance 2018-07, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business School, Economics and Finance Subject Group.
- Frijters, Paul & Kong, Tao Sherry & Liu, Elaine M., 2015.
"Who is coming to the artefactual field experiment? Participation bias among Chinese rural migrants,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 62-74.
- Paul Frijters & Tao Sherry Kong & Elaine M. Liu, 2015. "Who Is Coming to the Artefactual Field Experiment? Participation Bias among Chinese Rural Migrants," NBER Working Papers 20953, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Frijters, Paul & Kong, Tao Sherry & Liu, Elaine M., 2015. "Who Is Coming to the Artefactual Field Experiment? Participation Bias among Chinese Rural Migrants," IZA Discussion Papers 8843, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Mongoljin Batsaikhan, 2017. "Trust, Trustworthiness, And Business Success: Lab And Field Findings From Entrepreneurs," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 55(1), pages 368-382, January.
- Abeler, Johannes & Nosenzo, Daniele, 2013.
"Self-Selection into Economics Experiments Is Driven by Monetary Rewards,"
IZA Discussion Papers
7374, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Johannes Abeler & Daniele Nosenzo, 2013. "Self-selection into Economics Experiments is Driven by Monetary Rewards," Discussion Papers 2013-03, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Toke Reinholt Fosgaard, 2020. "Students Cheat More: Comparing the Dishonesty of a Student Sample and a Representative Sample in the Laboratory," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 122(1), pages 257-279, January.
- Loukas Balafoutas & Helena Fornwagner, 2017.
"The limits of guilt,"
Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 3(2), pages 137-148, December.
- Loukas Balafoutas & Helena Fornwagner, 2016. "The limits of guilt," Working Papers 2016-09, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
More about this item
Keywords
selection problem; laboratory experiments; external validity; networks; diffusion; peer effects;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
- C90 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - General
- D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-NET-2018-11-19 (Network Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:18-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Megan Luetje (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esichus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.