IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/uctcwp/qt8sr9d86r.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in California

Author

Listed:
  • Cervero, Robert

Abstract

Billions of dollars have been and are being spent on urban rail transit in California, yet the last 20 years have seen the private automobile increase its market share of travel at the expense of public transportation. Between 1980 and 1990, for instance, transit's share of commute trips feel from 5.4 percent to 4.8 percent greater in Los Angeles and from 11.9 percent to 10.0 percent in the San Francisco Bay Area. One possible strategy for reversing this trend would be to concentrate more housing and workplaces around rail stations -- that is, put more of the ends of the commute trip, home and work, near transit. Besides increasing transit ridership, other secondary benefits might accrue improved air quality (especially to the extent short park-and-ride trips are converted to walk-and-ride), higher revenues (not just from farebox returns but possible joint development programs like air rights leasing), inner-city redevelopment and increases in affordable housing, and infill development and more efficient urban form.

Suggested Citation

  • Cervero, Robert, 1993. "Ridership Impacts of Transit-Focused Development in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8sr9d86r, University of California Transportation Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt8sr9d86r
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8sr9d86r.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Xiaoyan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Cao, Xiaoshu & Yin, Jiangbin, 2016. "How does the propensity of living near rail transit moderate the influence of rail transit on transit trip frequency in Xi'an?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 194-204.
    2. Gregory Thompson & Jeffrey Brown & Torsha Bhattacharya, 2012. "What Really Matters for Increasing Transit Ridership: Understanding the Determinants of Transit Ridership Demand in Broward County, Florida," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(15), pages 3327-3345, November.
    3. Douglas Houston & Marlon G Boarnet & Gavin Ferguson & Steven Spears, 2015. "Can compact rail transit corridors transform the automobile city? Planning for more sustainable travel in Los Angeles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 938-959, April.
    4. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2002. "Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1wg020cd, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Cervero, Robert & Bosselmann, Peter, 1994. "An Evaluation of the Market Potential for Transit-Oriented Development Using Visual Simulation Techniques," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8qf9116b, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Loukaitou-Sideris, Anastasia & Banerjee, Tridib, 1994. "Form Follows Transit? The Blue Line Corridor's Development Potentials," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt68t5q6b3, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Cervero, Robert, 2006. "Transit Oriented Development’s Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8jn8g0hc, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Cervero, Robert & Bernick, Michael & Gilbert, Jill, 1994. "Market Opportunities and Barriers to Transit-Based Development in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2c01z5hw, University of California Transportation Center.
    9. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1997. "Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system: Land use and development impacts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 309-333, July.
    10. Kalkstein, Adam J & Kuby, Michael & Gerrity, Daniel & Clancy, James J, 2009. "An analysis of air mass effects on rail ridership in three US cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 198-207.
    11. Cervero, Robert & Duncan, Michael, 2008. "Residential Self Selection and Rail Commuting: A Nested Logit Analysis," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt72p9n6qt, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Nasri, Arefeh & Zhang, Lei, 2014. "The analysis of transit-oriented development (TOD) in Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metropolitan areas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 172-179.
    13. Cervero, Robert & Menotti, Val, 1994. "Market Profiles of Rail-Based Housing Projects in California," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt89k664kz, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Robert Cervero, 2007. "Transit-Oriented Development's Ridership Bonus: A Product of Self-Selection and Public Policies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(9), pages 2068-2085, September.
    15. Kuby, Michael & Barranda, Anthony & Upchurch, Christopher, 2004. "Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 223-247, March.
    16. Cervero, Robert & Round, Alfred & Goldman, Todd & Wu, Kang-Li, 1995. "Rail Access Modes and Catchment Areas for the BART System," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt07k76097, University of California Transportation Center.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:uctcwp:qt8sr9d86r. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.