IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsrrp/qt586755r9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development of a Modeling Framework for Analyzing Improvements in Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports

Author

Listed:
  • Lu, Xiao-Yun
  • Gosling, Geoffrey D.
  • Shladover, Steven E.
  • Xiong, Jing
  • Ceder, Avi

Abstract

This report has been prepared as part of a research project developing a combined quantitative and qualitative approach to planning for improved intermodal connectivity at California airports. The quantitative approach involves the development of an Intermodal Airport Ground Access Planning Tool (IAPT) that combines an air passenger mode choice model, a model of transportation provider behavior and a traffic network analysis model. The qualitative approach will be used to enhance the quantitative analysis to account for those factors which are difficult to quantify and to provide recommended policy and planning guidelines. This report represents a continuation of the previously submitted Working Paper, so that together they describe the main work conducted in the first year of the project. This report summarizes the work reported in the Working Paper in Chapter 3: Opportunities for Improved Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports. This report concentrates on the modeling and IAPT design. The modeling includes two main components of the IAPT, i.e. air passenger mode choice model and transportation provider behavior model. This modeling work involves the following steps: •System isolation (definition of problem scope): to isolate the airport ground access system from general transit systems; •System simplification: several assumptions have been developed which greatly simplify the problem to avoid network optimization in a transit system; • Mathematical model development and justification. The IAPT design includes detailed software structure and functions, user interface, data base, and data flow. Plans for further development of the IAPT and recommendations for future study of airport ground access planning issues are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu, Xiao-Yun & Gosling, Geoffrey D. & Shladover, Steven E. & Xiong, Jing & Ceder, Avi, 2006. "Development of a Modeling Framework for Analyzing Improvements in Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt586755r9, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt586755r9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/586755r9.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ceder, A. & Golany, B. & Tal, O., 2001. "Creating bus timetables with maximal synchronization," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 913-928, December.
    2. Randolph W. Hall, 1985. "Vehicle Scheduling at a Transportation Terminal with Random Delay en Route," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 308-320, August.
    3. Small, Kenneth A, 1987. "A Discrete Choice Model for Ordered Alternatives," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(2), pages 409-424, March.
    4. Pels, Eric & Nijkamp, Peter & Rietveld, Piet, 2003. "Access to and competition between airports: a case study for the San Francisco Bay area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 71-83, January.
    5. Psaraki, Voula & Abacoumkin, Costas, 2002. "Access mode choice for relocated airports: the new Athens International Airport," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 89-98.
    6. Hess, Stephane & Polak, John W., 2005. "Mixed logit modelling of airport choice in multi-airport regions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 59-68.
    7. Golob, Thomas F., 2001. "Joint models of attitudes and behavior in evaluation of the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 495-514, July.
    8. David Hensher & William Greene, 2003. "The Mixed Logit model: The state of practice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 133-176, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lu, Xiao-Yun & Gosling, Geoffrey D. & Ceder, Avi & Tung, Steven & Tso, Kristin & Shladover, Steven & Xiong, Jing & Yoon, Sangwon, 2009. "A Combined Quantitative and Qualitative Approach to Planning for Improved Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1r7227tt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Hess, Stephane, 2007. "Posterior analysis of random taste coefficients in air travel behaviour modelling," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 203-212.
    3. Birolini, Sebastian & Malighetti, Paolo & Redondi, Renato & Deforza, Paolo, 2019. "Access mode choice to low-cost airports: Evaluation of new direct rail services at Milan-Bergamo airport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 113-124.
    4. Qin, Huanmei & Gao, Jianqiang & Zhang, Guohui & Chen, Yanyan & Wu, Songhua, 2017. "Nested logit model formation to analyze airport parking behavior based on stated preference survey studies," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 164-175.
    5. Gunay, Gurkan & Gokasar, Ilgin, 2021. "Market segmentation analysis for airport access mode choice modeling with mixed logit," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Avogadro, Nicolò & Birolini, Sebastian & Redondi, Renato & Deforza, Paolo, 2024. "Assessing airport ground access interventions: An integrated approach combining mode choice modeling and microscopic traffic simulation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 154-167.
    7. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2011. "Regional airport choice: Consumer behaviour and policy implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 70-84.
    8. Fosgerau, Mogens & Bierlaire, Michel, 2007. "A practical test for the choice of mixing distribution in discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 784-794, August.
    9. de Luca, Stefano, 2012. "Modelling airport choice behaviour for direct flights, connecting flights and different travel plans," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 148-163.
    10. Fay Dunkerley & Andre De Palma & Stef Proost, 2009. "Spatial Asymmetric Duopoly With An Application To Brussels' Airports," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 529-553, August.
    11. Xia, Wenyi & Jiang, Changmin & Wang, Kun & Zhang, Anming, 2019. "Air-rail revenue sharing in a multi-airport system: Effects on traffic and social welfare," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 304-319.
    12. Stephane Hess & Denis Bolduc & John Polak, 2010. "Random covariance heterogeneity in discrete choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 391-411, May.
    13. Wadud, Zia, 2020. "An examination of the effects of ride-hailing services on airport parking demand," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    14. Escobari, Diego, 2017. "Airport, airline and departure time choice and substitution patterns: An empirical analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 198-210.
    15. Arora, Swapan Deep & Mathur, Sameer, 2020. "Effect of airline choice and temporality on flight delays," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    16. Koster, Paul & Kroes, Eric & Verhoef, Erik, 2011. "Travel time variability and airport accessibility," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1545-1559.
    17. Birolini, Sebastian & Cattaneo, Mattia & Malighetti, Paolo & Morlotti, Chiara, 2020. "Integrated origin-based demand modeling for air transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    18. Stephane Hess, 2005. "Analysing air-travel choice behaviour in the Greater London area," ERSA conference papers ersa05p736, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Bao, Danwen & Hua, Songyi & Gu, Jiayu, 2016. "Relevance of airport accessibility and airport competition," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 52-60.
    20. Lotti, Raoni & Caetano, Mauro, 2018. "The airport choice of exporters for fruit from Brazil," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 104-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt586755r9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.