IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt7q36991f.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Assessment of how State and Regional Transportation Agencies Advance Equity in Transportation Plans, Processes, and Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Barajas, Jesus M. PhD
  • Natekal, Asiya PhD
  • Abrams, Carolyn MURP

Abstract

To provide California with recommendations for how to advance transportation equity, this study examines how state DOTs and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) are implementing equity-based planning. The research team conducted a content analysis on the long-range transportation plans (LRTPs) and active transportation plans of six state DOTs, and the LRTPs and federal transportation improvement documents of six California MPOs to identify equity practices and performance measures in those plans. They also interviewed representatives from five state DOTs to identify methods the organizations are using to advance equity. Every organization acknowledged the importance of considering equity, but the nature and degree with which equity practices were implemented varied considerably. Outreach and engagement were the most common equity practices. Many DOTs had developed or were developing performance metrics for equity, but several lacked appropriate disaggregate data to identify effects on people of color or other marginalized population groups. Few organizations explicitly identified how equity was guiding decision-making in their plans. Innovative practices included establishing listening sessions to define transportation equity, centering public health in decision-making, developing creative ways to direct funding to the neediest communities, and institutionalizing equity through leadership positions or bottom-up decision-making within functional areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Barajas, Jesus M. PhD & Natekal, Asiya PhD & Abrams, Carolyn MURP, 2022. "An Assessment of how State and Regional Transportation Agencies Advance Equity in Transportation Plans, Processes, and Implementation," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7q36991f, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7q36991f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7q36991f.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilson X. B. Li & Tina T. He, 2021. "Determinations of strategy responding to COVID-19," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 135-147, April.
    2. Andrei O. J. Kwok & Motoki Watabe & Pervaiz K. Ahmed, 2021. "Strategic Organizational Decision-Making," Springer Books, in: Augmenting Employee Trust and Cooperation, chapter 0, pages 101-113, Springer.
    3. Dziubiński, Marcin & Goyal, Sanjeev & Minarsch, David E.N., 2021. "The strategy of conquest," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. ., 2021. "Strategic dimension in innovation orientation," Chapters, in: Innovation Orientation in Business Services, chapter 3, pages 37-54, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Hong SHENG & Lin ZHANG & Pu QIAN, 2021. "Strategies and Timing of Medical System Reform," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: A Theoretical Analysis, Performance Evaluation, and Reform Solution of the Health Care System in China, chapter 7, pages 289-303, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Mustafa Ou{g}uz Afacan & In'acio B'o, 2020. "Strategy-proof Popular Mechanisms," Papers 2012.01004, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    7. Antoine Falck & Adam Rej & David Thesmar, 2021. "Why and how systematic strategies decay," Papers 2105.01380, arXiv.org.
    8. Misbahul Munir & Maretha Ika Prajawati & Basir S., 2021. "Strategies of Sustainable Cooperative Partnerships," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(3), pages 157-161, May.
    9. Alamgir Khalil & Salahuddin & Wali Khan Mashwani & Muhammad Shafiq & Saima Hassan & Wiyada Kumam, 2021. "New advanced outliers detection tests," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(7), pages 1640-1655, April.
    10. Ana S. Guimarães & João M. P. Q. Delgado & Sandra S. Lucas, 2021. "Advanced Manufacturing in Civil Engineering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    11. Rajagopal, 2021. "Crowd-Based Business Leadership and Strategies," Springer Books, in: Crowd-Based Business Models, chapter 0, pages 133-162, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Michael & Drummond, Michael & Taylor, David & McGuire, Alistair & Carter, Paul & Mossialos, Elias, 2022. "Promoting innovation while controlling cost: The UK's approach to health technology assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(3), pages 224-233.
    2. de Miguel-Arribas, A. & Morón-Vidal, J. & Floría, L.M. & Gracia-Lázaro, C. & Hernández, L. & Moreno, Y., 2024. "Contests in two fronts," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Tregidga, Helen & Laine, Matias, 2022. "On crisis and emergency: Is it time to rethink long-term environmental accounting?," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Nani, Albi, 2023. "Valuing big data: An analysis of current regulations and proposal of frameworks," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Levine, David K. & Modica, Salvatore, 2022. "Survival of the Weakest: Why the West Rules," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 394-421.
    6. Nejat Anbarc{i} & Kutay Cingiz & Mehmet S. Ismail, 2020. "Proportional resource allocation in dynamic n-player Blotto games," Papers 2010.05087, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    7. Serhat Doğan & Kerim Keskin & Çağrı Sağlam, 2023. "Analyzing strategic behavior in a dynamic model of bargaining and war," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 233-257, December.
    8. Cortes-Corrales, Sebastián & Gorny, Paul M., 2018. "Generalising Conflict Networks," MPRA Paper 90001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Brücker, Herbert & Deuster, Christoph & Fendel, Tanja & Jaschke, Philipp & Keita, Sekou & Freitas Monteiro, Teresa, 2021. "Nach der Machtübernahme der Taliban in Afghanistan: Erfahrungen aus der Vergangenheit und erste Einschätzungen der Folgen für Migration und Integration," IAB-Forschungsbericht 202109, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    10. Traldi, Rebecca & Silva, Julie A. & Potapov, Peter & Tyukavina, Alexandra & Epprecht, Michael & Gore, Meredith L. & Phompila, Chittana, 2023. "Cultivating inequality? Regional rubber dynamics and implications for voluntary sustainability programs in Lao PDR," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Sun, Xiang & Xu, Jin & Zhou, Junjie, 2023. "Effort discrimination and curvature of contest technology in conflict networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 978-991.
    12. Cai, Xinyue & Kimya, Mert, 2023. "Stability of alliance networks," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 401-409.
    13. Jesús Fernández-Villaverde & Mark Koyama & Youhong Lin & Tuan-Hwee Sng, 2023. "The Fractured-Land Hypothesis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 1173-1231.
    14. Anbarci, Nejat & Cingiz, Kutay & Ismail, Mehmet S., 2023. "Proportional resource allocation in dynamic n-player Blotto games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 94-100.
    15. Choi, Sanghak, 2024. "Climate change exposure and the use of short-term debt," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Huang, Ying & Jiao, Qian & Shen, Bo & Sun, Xiang, 2023. "Conflicts in regular networks," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Srivastava, Alok, 2022. "Challenges for evaluation practices and innovative approaches: Lessons during COVID-19 pandemic," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    18. Anbarci, Nejat & Cingiz, Kutay & Ismail, Mehmet, 2018. "Multi-Battle n-Player Dynamic Contests," Research Memorandum 003, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    19. Asadul Islam, 2017. "Cross-modal Computer Games as an Interactive Learning Medium," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5007280, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    20. Christian Voegtlin & Andreas Georg Scherer & Günter K. Stahl & Olga Hawn, 2022. "Grand Societal Challenges and Responsible Innovation," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 1-28, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt7q36991f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.