IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt03v2q5b7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trivariate Probit Models of Pre-purchase/ Purchase Shopping Channel Choice: Clothing Purchases in Northern California

Author

Listed:
  • Mokhtarian, Patricia
  • Tang, Wei Laura

Abstract

This study analyzes the joint choice of pre-purchase and purchase shopping channels for clothing purchases, using data collected from an internet-based survey of two university towns in Northern California (final Ns=390 and 452). Descriptive analysis clearly shows dependence across these three choices: in particular, the “sticky” combinations of {only-store pre-purchase + store purchase} and {only internet pre-purchase + internet purchase} occur substantially more often than independent choices would predict. We develop two trivariate probit (TVP) models, consisting of two binary choice equations for the pre-purchase channel (respectively measuring the use of store or not, and the use of internet or not) and one binary choice equation for the purchase channel (store or internet). One model allows prior channel purchase experience variables to enter while the other model excludes them. The results further confirm the dependency among pre-purchase and purchase channel choices, with all three error term correlations strongly significant. In addition to breadth and depth of experience variables and channel-specific perceptions (post-purchase satisfaction, cost savings, enjoyment, and convenience), significant explanatory variables include general shopping-related attitudes (pro-exercise, shop enjoyment, and store enjoyment), context variables, and sociodemographic traits (age and income). Prediction of joint choice probabilities was considerably better for the TVP model than for independent binary choice models, confirming the value of simultaneously modeling pre-purchase and purchase channel choice bundles

Suggested Citation

  • Mokhtarian, Patricia & Tang, Wei Laura, 2011. "Trivariate Probit Models of Pre-purchase/ Purchase Shopping Channel Choice: Clothing Purchases in Northern California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt03v2q5b7, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt03v2q5b7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/03v2q5b7.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E B Howard, 1985. "Teleshopping in North America," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 12(2), pages 141-150, June.
    2. Cao, Xinyu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5z75n416, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt45q5p1vb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Fang Ren & Mei-Po Kwan, 2009. "The Impact of Geographic Context on E-Shopping Behavior," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(2), pages 262-278, April.
    5. Patricia Mokhtarian, 2004. "A conceptual analysis of the transportation impacts of B2C e-commerce," Transportation, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 257-284, August.
    6. Chris Forman & Anindya Ghose & Avi Goldfarb, 2009. "Competition Between Local and Electronic Markets: How the Benefit of Buying Online Depends on Where You Live," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(1), pages 47-57, January.
    7. Manski, Charles F. & Salomon, Ilan, 1987. "The demand for teleshopping : An application of discrete choice models," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 109-121, February.
    8. Sendy Farag & Jesse Weltevreden & Ton van Rietbergen & Martin Dijst & Frank van Oort, 2006. "E-Shopping in the Netherlands: Does Geography Matter?," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 33(1), pages 59-74, February.
    9. Oude Lansink, Alfons & van den Berg, Mirella & Huirne, Ruud, 2003. "Analysis of strategic planning of Dutch pig farmers using a multivariate probit model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 73-84, October.
    10. Helen Couclelis, 2004. "Pizza over the Internet: e-commerce, the fragmentation of activity and the tyranny of the region," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 41-54, January.
    11. Ory, David T & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2007. "Description of a Northern California Shopping Survey Data Collection Effort," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt39w9w743, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt095934s0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    13. John R. Hauser, 1978. "Testing the Accuracy, Usefulness, and Significance of Probabilistic Choice Models: An Information-Theoretic Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 406-421, June.
    14. Klein, Lisa R., 1998. "Evaluating the Potential of Interactive Media through a New Lens: Search versus Experience Goods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 195-203, March.
    15. Ory, David T & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2007. "Description of a Northern California Shopping Survey Data Collection Effort," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7k9413nw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Cao, Xinyu (Jason), 2012. "The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 993-1002.
    17. Xinyu Cao & Zhiyi Xu & Frank Douma, 2012. "The interactions between e-shopping and traditional in-store shopping: an application of structural equations model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 957-974, September.
    18. Patricia L Mokhtarian & David T Ory & Xinyu Cao, 2009. "Shopping-Related Attitudes: A Factor and Cluster Analysis of Northern California Shoppers," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(2), pages 204-228, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhen, Feng & Du, Xiaojuan & Cao, Jason & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2018. "The association between spatial attributes and e-shopping in the shopping process for search goods and experience goods: Evidence from Nanjing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 291-299.
    2. Suel, Esra & Polak, John W., 2017. "Development of joint models for channel, store, and travel mode choice: Grocery shopping in London," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 147-162.
    3. H. R., Ganesha & Aithal, Sreeramana & P., Kirubadevi, 2020. "Changes in Consumer Perspective towards Discount at Brick-and-Mortar Stores owing to Emergence of Online Store Format in India," MPRA Paper 104023, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Comi, Antonio, 2020. "A modelling framework to forecast urban goods flows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    5. Radoslaw Macik & Dorota Macik & Monika Nalewajek, 2013. "Consumer’s Perception of Retail Formats: Case of Poland," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    6. Schmid, Basil & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "In-store or online shopping of search and experience goods: A hybrid choice approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 156-180.
    7. Qing Zhai & Xinyu Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Feng Zhen, 2017. "The interactions between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process for search goods and experience goods," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 885-904, September.
    8. Radoslaw Macik & Dorota Macik & Monika Nalewajek, 2013. "Consumer Preferences for Retail Format Choice: The Case of Polish Consumers," Active Citizenship by Knowledge Management & Innovation: Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2013,, ToKnowPress.
    9. Radoslaw Macik & Dorota Macik, 2011. "Physical vs. Virtual Information Search and Purchase in the Buying Behavior of Polish Young Consumers," MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tang, Wei & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2009. "Accounting for Taste Heterogeneity in Purchase Channel Intention Modeling: An Example from Northern California for Book Purchases," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt3v25m8dc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Qing Zhai & Xinyu Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Feng Zhen, 2017. "The interactions between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process for search goods and experience goods," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 885-904, September.
    3. Tang, Wei & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2009. "Accounting for Taste Heterogeneity in Purchase Channel Intention Modeling: An Example from Northern California for Book Purchases," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9mg5s5g8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    4. Zhen, Feng & Du, Xiaojuan & Cao, Jason & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2018. "The association between spatial attributes and e-shopping in the shopping process for search goods and experience goods: Evidence from Nanjing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 291-299.
    5. Shi, Kunbo & De Vos, Jonas & Yang, Yongchun & Witlox, Frank, 2019. "Does e-shopping replace shopping trips? Empirical evidence from Chengdu, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 21-33.
    6. Xinyu Cao & Zhiyi Xu & Frank Douma, 2012. "The interactions between e-shopping and traditional in-store shopping: an application of structural equations model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(5), pages 957-974, September.
    7. Patricia L Mokhtarian & David T Ory & Xinyu Cao, 2009. "Shopping-Related Attitudes: A Factor and Cluster Analysis of Northern California Shoppers," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(2), pages 204-228, April.
    8. Shah, Harsh & Carrel, Andre L. & Le, Huyen T.K., 2021. "What is your shopping travel style? Heterogeneity in US households’ online shopping and travel," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 83-98.
    9. Lee, Richard J. & Sener, Ipek N. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Handy, Susan L., 2017. "Relationships between the online and in-store shopping frequency of Davis, California residents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 40-52.
    10. Zhou, Yiwei & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara), 2014. "Explore the relationship between online shopping and shopping trips: An analysis with the 2009 NHTS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-9.
    11. Pernot, Delphine, 2021. "Internet shopping for Everyday Consumer Goods: An examination of the purchasing and travel practices of click and pickup outlet customers," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    12. Pengyu Zhu & Liping Wang & Yanpeng Jiang & Jiangping Zhou, 2018. "Metropolitan size and the impacts of telecommuting on personal travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 385-414, March.
    13. Xu, Lu & Saphores, Jean-Daniel, 2024. "Does e-shopping impact household travel? Evidence from the 2017 U.S. NHTS," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    14. Kim, Woojung & Wang, Xiaokun Cara, 2022. "The adoption of alternative delivery locations in New York City: Who and how far?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 127-140.
    15. Xi, Guangliang & Cao, Xinyu & Zhen, Feng, 2020. "The impacts of same day delivery online shopping on local store shopping in Nanjing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 35-47.
    16. Yue-Teng Wong, 2013. "Personal Characteristics and Hedonic Shopping Orientation on Apparel Adult Shoppers’ Repatronage Behavioral Intention," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 5(8), pages 505-510.
    17. Schmid, Basil & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "In-store or online shopping of search and experience goods: A hybrid choice approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 156-180.
    18. Oz Shy, 2013. "Window shopping," Working Papers 13-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    19. Ory, David T & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2007. "Description of a Northern California Shopping Survey Data Collection Effort," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt39w9w743, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    20. Ory, David T & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2007. "Description of a Northern California Shopping Survey Data Collection Effort," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt7k9413nw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Engineering;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt03v2q5b7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.