IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/indrel/qt0n59w41w.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consequences of Beliefs about the Malleability of Creativity

Author

Listed:
  • O'Connor, Alexander J.
  • Nemeth, Charlan J.
  • Akutsu, Satoshi

Abstract

Attempts to maximize creativity pervade corporate, artistic, and scientific domains. This research investigated how individual’s implicit theories about the malleability of creativity affect several creativity related constructs. Through two correlational and one experimental study we examine the relationship between implicit theories about creativity and their effect on both creative problem solving and lifetime creative achievement. In Study 1 incremental theories in creativity are associated with interest in creative thinking, self-reported creativity, and creative problem-solving. In Study 2, incremental theories are associated with lifetime creative achievements in a cross-cultural, professional sample. In Study 3, incremental primes of creativity led to increased creative problem-solving. Further, all studies establish discriminant validity and domain-specificity for implicit theories of creativity. Specifically, Studies 1 and 2 control for individual differences in implicit theories of intelligence, suggesting that implicit theories of creativity and intelligence are meaningfully distinct. Study 3 finds that incremental theories of creativity enhance creative problem-solving but not problem-solving more generally.

Suggested Citation

  • O'Connor, Alexander J. & Nemeth, Charlan J. & Akutsu, Satoshi, 2012. "Consequences of Beliefs about the Malleability of Creativity," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt0n59w41w, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt0n59w41w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/0n59w41w.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulus, Paul B. & Yang, Huei-Chuan, 2000. "Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 76-87, May.
    2. Robert Wilson & J. Guilford & Paul Christensen & Donald Lewis, 1954. "A factor-analytic study of creative-thinking abilities," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 19(4), pages 297-311, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang Kai, 2019. "Towards a Taxonomy of Idea Generation Techniques," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 65-80, January.
    2. Shelley D. Dionne & Hiroki Sayama & Francis J. Yammarino, 2019. "Diversity and Social Network Structure in Collective Decision Making: Evolutionary Perspectives with Agent-Based Simulations," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, March.
    3. Gu, Jifa & Tang, Xijin, 2005. "Meta-synthesis approach to complex system modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(3), pages 597-614, November.
    4. Emich, Kyle J. & Vincent, Lynne C., 2020. "Shifting focus: The influence of affective diversity on team creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-37.
    5. Alexander Brem & Rogelio Puente-Díaz & Marine Agogué, 2017. "Creativity and Innovation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives for Research," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem & Rogelio Puente-Diaz & Marine Agogué (ed.), The Role of Creativity in the Management of Innovation State of the Art and Future Research Outlook, chapter 1, pages 1-12, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Mohamed Zennouche & Jian Zhang & Bo Wen Wang, 2014. "Factors influencing innovation at individual, group and organisational levels: a content analysis," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 23-42.
    7. Pillay, Nashita & Park, Guihyun & Kim, Ye Kang & Lee, Sujin, 2020. "Thanks for your ideas: Gratitude and team creativity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 69-81.
    8. Iryna Sikora, 2019. "Creative Production and Exchange of Ideas," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(5), pages 20-44.
    9. Johnson, Joseph G. & Raab, Markus, 2003. "Take The First: Option-generation and resulting choices," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 215-229, July.
    10. Sandra A. Slaughter & Laurie J. Kirsch, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer Portfolios in Software Process Improvement: A Field Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 301-320, September.
    11. Alessandra Tognazzo & Paola Angela Maria Mazzurana, 2017. "Friends doing business. An Explorative Longitudinal Case Study of Creativity and Innovation in an Italian Technology-Based Start-Up," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(2), pages 77-103.
    12. Francesco Schiavone & Manuel Villasalero, 2013. "Creativity, Organizational Knowledge, and the Power of Dreams," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 4(3), pages 279-292, September.
    13. Hemlin, Sven, 2002. "Creative Knowledge Environments in the Innovation System," Working Papers 7/2002, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Management, Politics & Philosophy.
    14. Staats, Bradley R. & Milkman, Katherine L. & Fox, Craig R., 2012. "The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 132-142.
    15. Yang, Mu & Han, Chunjia, 2021. "Stimulating innovation: Managing peer interaction for idea generation on digital innovation platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-465.
    16. Krause, Verena & Goncalo, Jack A. & Tadmor, Carmit T., 2021. "Divine inhibition: Does thinking about God make monotheistic believers less creative?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 158-178.
    17. Merlo, Omar & Bell, Simon J. & Menguc, Bulent & Whitwell, Gregory J., 2006. "Social capital, customer service orientation and creativity in retail stores," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(12), pages 1214-1221, November.
    18. Montag-Smit, Tamara & Maertz, Carl P., 2017. "Searching outside the box in creative problem solving: The role of creative thinking skills and domain knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-10.
    19. Ken T. Trotman & Roger Simnett & Amna Khalifa, 2009. "Impact of the Type of Audit Team Discussions on Auditors' Generation of Material Frauds," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 1115-1142, December.
    20. Goncalo, Jack A. & Duguid, Michelle M., 2008. "Hidden consequences of the group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 107(2), pages 219-233, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt0n59w41w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.