IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camjip/2416.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Should We Augment Large Covariance Matrix Estimation with Auxiliary Network Information?

Author

Listed:
  • Ge, S.
  • Li, S.
  • Linton, O. B.
  • Liu, W.
  • Su, W.

Abstract

In this paper, we propose two novel frameworks to incorporate auxiliary information about connectivity among entities (i.e., network information) into the estimation of large covariance matrices. The current literature either completely ignores this kind of network information (e.g., thresholding and shrinkage) or utilizes some simple network structure under very restrictive settings (e.g., banding). In the era of big data, we can easily get access to auxiliary information about the complex connectivity structure among entities. Depending on the features of the auxiliary network information at hand and the structure of the covariance matrix, we provide two different frameworks correspondingly —the Network Guided Thresholding and the Network Guided Banding. We show that both Network Guided estimators have optimal convergence rates over a larger class of sparse covariance matrix. Simulation studies demonstrate that they generally outperform other pure statistical methods, especially when the true covariance matrix is sparse, and the auxiliary network contains genuine information. Empirically, we apply our method to the estimation of the covariance matrix with the help of many financial linkage data of asset returns to attain the global minimum variance (GMV) portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge, S. & Li, S. & Linton, O. B. & Liu, W. & Su, W., 2024. "Should We Augment Large Covariance Matrix Estimation with Auxiliary Network Information?," Janeway Institute Working Papers 2416, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cam:camjip:2416
    Note: obl20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.janeway.econ.cam.ac.uk/working-paper-pdfs/jiwp2416.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Banding; Big Data; Large Covariance Matrix; Network; Thresholding;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camjip:2416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://janeway.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.