IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/boa/wpaper/202406.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Unraveling the Dividend Puzzle: A Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoqiao Wang

    (School of Management and Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen)

  • Jing Xie

    (Department of Finance and Business Economics, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Macau)

  • Bohui Zhang

    (School of Management and Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen)

  • Xiaofeng Zhao

    (Faculty of Business, Lingnan University)

Abstract

We conduct a field experiment to explore why firms pay dividends. We change managers’perception of agency concerns from outside investors, investors’ risk preference, the information gap with outside investors, and firms’ tax clientele by contacting publicly listed firms in China to test four dividend theories (agency, bird-in-hand, signaling, and tax clientele theories). We find that past payers (firms that paid dividends in the previous year) receiving the treatment of agency concerns increase their dividends relative to the control group. In contrast, firms receiving the other treatments do not experience changes in their dividend policy. The treatment effect of agency concerns in past payers is more prominent for firms with weaker governance and robust to various model specifications. A post-experimental survey confirms our findings. The evidence suggests that the agency cost motive is most pertinent in explaining a firm’s dividend policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoqiao Wang & Jing Xie & Bohui Zhang & Xiaofeng Zhao, 2024. "Unraveling the Dividend Puzzle: A Field Experiment," Working Papers 202406, University of Macau, Faculty of Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:boa:wpaper:202406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fba.um.edu.mo/wp-content/uploads/RePEc/doc/202406.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Dividend policy; Field experiment; Agency costs; Investor Relations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G35 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Payout Policy
    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boa:wpaper:202406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carla Leong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fbmacmo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.