IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bge/wpaper/1466.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supply Chain Disruption and Precautionary Industrial Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Polo
  • Massimo Motta

Abstract

The paper analyzes the design of industrial policies, in the form of subsidies to innovation activity or to local production, when domestic ï¬ rms are inefficient and there is a risk of supply-chain disruption. We ï¬ rst establish a case for research subsidies, since private investment (to improve the inferior technology) is lower than the socially optimal one. We next show the equivalence with subsidies to (inefficient) local production in case of intertemporal economies of scale. Then, within a general frame- work, we analyze proï¬ t and welfare maximizing investments and optimal subsidies in case of segmented markets and an integrated market organized as a duopoly, a monopoly or a research joint-venture. We show that research joint ventures or a public research center socially outperform the other environments since they beneï¬ t from a larger integrated market and a wider circulation of the innovation while preserving a competitive market. Finally, in large markets with signiï¬ cant technology gaps, it may be convenient to concentrate all the research in a single lab while maintaining a competitive market.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Polo & Massimo Motta, 2024. "Supply Chain Disruption and Precautionary Industrial Policy," Working Papers 1466, Barcelona School of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:1466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://bw.bse.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/1466-file.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. d'Aspremont, Claude & Jacquemin, Alexis, 1988. "Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(5), pages 1133-1137, December.
    2. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Alejandro Sabal, 2023. "Resilience in Vertical Supply Chains," Working Papers 2023-03, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    3. Philippe Aghion & Ketan Ahuja & Chad P. Bown & Uwe Cantner & Chiara Criscuolo & Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Mathias Dewatripont & Ricardo Hausmann & Guy Lalanne & Ben McWilliams & Dani Rodrik & Simone Ta, . "Sparking Europe’s new industrial revolution- A policy for net zero, growth and resilience," Bruegel Book, Bruegel, number node_9216.
    4. Fabra, Natalia & Motta, Massimo & Peitz, Martin, 2022. "Learning from electricity markets: How to design a resilience strategy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Federico, Giulio & Langus, Gregor & Valletti, Tommaso, 2018. "Horizontal mergers and product innovation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-23.
    6. Gene M. Grossman & Elhanan Helpman & Alejandro Sabal, 2023. "Resilience in Vertical Supply Chains," NBER Working Papers 31739, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Cyrille Schwellnus & Antton Haramboure & Lea Samek & Ricardo Chiapin Pechansky & Charles Cadestin, 2023. "Global value chain dependencies under the magnifying glass," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 142, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brunner, Philipp & Letina, Igor & Schmutzler, Armin, 2024. "Research joint ventures: The role of financial constraints," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Cabolis, C. & Manasakis, C. & Moreno, D. & Petrakis, E., 2021. "The interactions of R&D investments and horizontal mergers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 507-534.
    3. Tommaso Valletti & Hans Zenger, 2021. "Mergers with Differentiated Products: Where Do We Stand?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 58(1), pages 179-212, February.
    4. Giulio Federico & Fiona Scott Morton & Carl Shapiro, 2020. "Antitrust and Innovation: Welcoming and Protecting Disruption," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(1), pages 125-190.
    5. Motta, Massimo & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2021. "The effect of horizontal mergers, when firms compete in prices and investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Stadler Manfred & Unsorg Maximiliane, 2022. "Manager Delegation, Owner Coordination and Firms’ Investment in Automation," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 73(2), pages 159-182, August.
    7. Maarten Pieter Schinkel & Leonard Treuren, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility by Joint Agreement," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 21-063/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    8. Vincenzo Denicolò & Michele Polo, 2018. "The innovation theory of harm: an appraisal," IEFE Working Papers 103, IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    9. TODO Yasuyuki, 2025. "Reconsidering Supply Chains and Industrial Policy from the Economic Security Perspective," Policy Discussion Papers 25005, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    10. Grunfeld, Leo A., 2003. "Meet me halfway but don't rush: absorptive capacity and strategic R&D investment revisited," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 21(8), pages 1091-1109, October.
    11. Prokop, Jacek & Karbowski, Adam, 2013. "R&D cooperation and industry cartelization," Economics Discussion Papers 2013-41, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Jérôme Dollinger & Ana Mauleon & Vincent Vannetelbosch, 2024. "R &d and market sharing agreements," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 78(3), pages 877-922, November.
    13. Cassiman, Bruno & Perez-Castrillo, David & Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2002. "Endogenizing know-how flows through the nature of R&D investments," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 775-799, June.
    14. Frey, Rainer & Hussinger, Katrin, 2006. "The role of technology in M&As: a firm-level comparison of cross-border and domestic deals," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2006,45, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    15. Bertrand, Olivier & Zuniga, Pluvia, 2006. "R&D and M&A: Are cross-border M&A different? An investigation on OECD countries," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 401-423, March.
    16. Levy, Nadav, 2012. "Technology sharing and tacit collusion," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 204-216.
    17. Rajeev K. Goel, 2023. "Seek foreign funds or technology? Relative impacts of different spillover modes on innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1466-1488, August.
    18. Long, Jianjun & Wang, Fenglian, 2024. "Complexity of a two-stage R&D game within a cluster supply chain considering vertical R&D spillovers, effective information, and government subsidies," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 606-621.
    19. Ferriani, Fabrizio & Gazzani, Andrea, 2023. "The impact of the war in Ukraine on energy prices: Consequences for firms’ financial performance," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 221-230.
    20. Banal-Estañol, Albert & Duso, Tomaso & Seldeslachts, Jo & Szücs, Florian, 2022. "R&D Spillovers through RJV Cooperation," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    resilience; industrial policy;

    JEL classification:

    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • L52 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Industrial Policy; Sectoral Planning Methods
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:1466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruno Guallar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bargses.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.