IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aue/wpaper/0409.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regulatory assessment for chemicals: a rapid appraisal cost-benefit approach

Author

Listed:
  • David Pearce
  • Phoebe Koundouri

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore alternative 'rapid appraisal' methodologies for determining the costs and benefits of environmental legislation, the focus being the new Chemicals Policy in the European Union (EU) known as REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals). We show that a full and rigorous cost-benefit appraisal of this legislation is not possible because of informational deficiencies. Hence, some 'second best' approach is required. In addition, full cost-benefit appraisal is likely to be expensive and impossible to conduct in the near-term. We argue that it is possible to obtain some broad estimates of gains and losses by making reasonable assumptions and by pursuing different methodologies for estimating benefits. Two methodologies, both based on the notion of a disability-adjusted life year (DALY), are adopted. A DALYis a measure of health loss, enabling different forms of morbidity to be compared with premature mortality. We seek to 'monetise' DALYs in order to make a direct comparison with the costs of the policy measures. The first approach addresses health expenditure in the UK and EU, based on the presumption that this expenditure is incurred in order to avoid and treat the causes of DALYs. Health expenditure per DALY is thus a measure of the value of a DALYand this expenditure is avoided by reductions in DALYs due to environmental control. The second approach assigns a willingness-to-pay value to a DALY based on an 'anchor' estimate of the 'value of a statistical life' (VOSL) and an implied value of a 'life year' (VOLY). On the basis of these models we show that while the costs of REACH could be greater than benefits, the second approach reveals a strong probability that benefits exceed costs. Since our models explicitly exclude any environmental benefits, we regard our benefit estimates as minima. Overall, our own judgement is that we feel confident that REACH generates net benefits, a result consistent with other partial studies that have been carried out to date.

Suggested Citation

  • David Pearce & Phoebe Koundouri, 2004. "Regulatory assessment for chemicals: a rapid appraisal cost-benefit approach," DEOS Working Papers 0409, Athens University of Economics and Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:0409
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/2004.Regulatory.assessment.for.chemicals.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josephine A. Mauskopf & Michael T. French, 1991. "Estimating the Value of Avoiding Morbidity and Mortality from Foodborne Illnesses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 619-631, December.
    2. Anna Alberini & Maureen Cropper & Alan Krupnick & Nathalie Simon, 2006. "Willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: Does latency matter?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 231-245, May.
    3. Morgenstern, Richard D. & Pizer, William A. & Shih, Jhih-Shyang, 2002. "Jobs Versus the Environment: An Industry-Level Perspective," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-436, May.
    4. P. Filliger & M. Herry & F. Horak & V. Puybonnieux-Texier & P. Quenel & J. Schneider & R.K. Seethaler & J.C. Vernaud & H. Sommer & N. Künzli & R. Kaiser & S. Medina & M. Studnicka & Olivier Chanel, 2000. "Public-health impact of outdoor and traffic-related air pollution: a European assessment," Post-Print hal-01462907, HAL.
    5. Thomas Roediger-Schluga, 2004. "The Porter Hypothesis and the Economic Consequences of Environmental Regulation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3300.
    6. Wolfram Krewitt & Mike Holland & Alfred Trukenmüller & Thomas Heck & Rainer Friedrich, 1999. "Comparing costs and environmental benefits of strategies to combat acidification and ozone in Europe," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 2(4), pages 249-266, December.
    7. A. Markandya, 2000. "Employment and Environmental Protection," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 15(4), pages 297-322, April.
    8. N. Künzli & R. Kaiser & S. Medina & M. Studnicka & O. Chanel & P. Filliger & M. Herry & F. Horak & V. Puybonnieux-Texier & Philippe Quénel & Jodi Schneider & R. Seethaler & Jean-Christophe Vergnaud & , 2000. "Public health Impact of Outdoor and Traffic related Air Pollution," Post-Print halshs-00150955, HAL.
    9. Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen, 2003. "Willingness to pay for a QALY," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(12), pages 1049-1060, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyriaki Remoundou & Phoebe Koundouri, 2009. "Environmental Effects on Public Health: An Economic Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ami, Dominique & Aprahamian, Frédéric & Chanel, Olivier & Joulé, Robert-Vincent & Luchini, Stéphane, 2014. "Willingness to pay of committed citizens: A field experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 31-39.
    2. Amit Kr. Gorai & Paul B. Tchounwou & Francis Tuluri, 2016. "Association between Ambient Air Pollution and Asthma Prevalence in Different Population Groups Residing in Eastern Texas, USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Deuten, Sebastiaan & Gómez Vilchez, Jonatan J. & Thiel, Christian, 2020. "Analysis and testing of electric car incentive scenarios in the Netherlands and Norway," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Meelan Thondoo & David Rojas-Rueda & Joyeeta Gupta & Daniel H. de Vries & Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen, 2019. "Systematic Literature Review of Health Impact Assessments in Low and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Adel Ben Youssef & Laurence Lannes & Christophe Rault & Agnès Soucat, 2016. "Energy Consumption and Health Outcomes in Africa," Post-Print halshs-01384730, HAL.
    6. Gössling, Stefan, 2016. "Urban transport justice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-9.
    7. Adrián Giovani Trejo-González & Horacio Riojas-Rodriguez & José Luis Texcalac-Sangrador & Carlos Manuel Guerrero-López & Karla Cervantes-Martínez & Magali Hurtado-Díaz & Luz Angélica de la Sierra-de l, 2019. "Quantifying health impacts and economic costs of PM2.5 exposure in Mexican cities of the National Urban System," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(4), pages 561-572, May.
    8. Shreosi Sanyal & Thierry Rochereau & Cara Nichole Maesano & Laure Com-Ruelle & Isabella Annesi-Maesano, 2018. "Long-Term Effect of Outdoor Air Pollution on Mortality and Morbidity: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study for Metropolitan France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-8, November.
    9. Rakesh Bhutiani & Dipali B. Kulkarni & D. R. Khanna & Varun Tyagi & Faheem Ahamad, 2021. "Spatial and seasonal variations in particulate matter and gaseous pollutants around integrated industrial estate (IIE), SIDCUL, Haridwar: a case study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 15619-15638, October.
    10. Dimitris Evangelopoulos & Roman Perez-Velasco & Heather Walton & Sophie Gumy & Martin Williams & Frank J. Kelly & Nino Künzli, 2020. "The role of burden of disease assessment in tracking progress towards achieving WHO global air quality guidelines," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(8), pages 1455-1465, November.
    11. Cárdenas Rodríguez, Miguel & Dupont-Courtade, Laura & Oueslati, Walid, 2016. "Air pollution and urban structure linkages: Evidence from European cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-9.
    12. Lu-Yi Qiu & Ling-Yun He, 2017. "Are Chinese Green Transport Policies Effective? A New Perspective from Direct Pollution Rebound Effect, and Empirical Evidence From the Road Transport Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Sergey PALTSEV & John REILLY & Trent YANG, 2010. "Air Pollution Health Effects: Toward an Integrated Assessment," EcoMod2004 330600109, EcoMod.
    14. Ya-Juan Gao & Chiung-Ling Wang & Min-Ling Huang & Wei Guo, 2022. "A New Perspective of Sustainable Perception: Research on the Smellscape of Urban Block Space," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, July.
    15. Huhtala, Anni & Samakovlis, Eva, 2003. "Green Accounting, Air Pollution and Health," Working Papers 82, National Institute of Economic Research.
    16. Liu, Lei & Wang, Ke & Wang, Shanshan & Zhang, Ruiqin & Tang, Xiaoyan, 2018. "Assessing energy consumption, CO2 and pollutant emissions and health benefits from China's transport sector through 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 382-396.
    17. McHenry, Mark, 2009. "Policy options when giving negative externalities market value: Clean energy policymaking and restructuring the Western Australian energy sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1423-1431, April.
    18. W. W. Che & H. Christopher Frey & Alexis K. H. Lau, 2014. "Assessment of the Effect of Population and Diary Sampling Methods on Estimation of School‐Age Children Exposure to Fine Particles," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(12), pages 2066-2079, December.
    19. Nam, Kyung-Min & Selin, Noelle E. & Reilly, John M. & Paltsev, Sergey, 2010. "Measuring welfare loss caused by air pollution in Europe: A CGE analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5059-5071, September.
    20. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aue:wpaper:0409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ekaterini Glynou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diauegr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.