IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/atg/wpaper/2010010.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Documento de Trabalho 01/2010 - Delimitação de Mercado Relevante

Author

Listed:
  • Sergio Aquino de Souza

    (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos)

  • Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro

    (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos)

  • Gerson Carvalho

    (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos)

Abstract

Apresenta uma síntese dos métodos quantitativos que podem ser usados para delimitação de mercado relevante, fazendo uma resenha dos métodos usados no SBDC e ao final faz recomendações de usos e a identificação de tendências e sugestões de aplicações dos métodos.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Aquino de Souza & Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro & Gerson Carvalho, 2010. "Documento de Trabalho 01/2010 - Delimitação de Mercado Relevante," Documentos de Trabalho 2010010, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.
    • Handle: RePEc:atg:wpaper:2010010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.cade.gov.br/Portal/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/estudos-economicos/documentos-de-trabalho/2010/documento-de-trabalho-n01-2010-delimitacao-de-mercado-relevante.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm B. Coate & Jeffrey H. Fischer, 2008. "A Practical Guide To The Hypothetical Monopolist Test For Market Definition [Market Definition: An Analytical Overview]," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 1031-1063.
    2. Mario Forni, 2004. "Using Stationarity Tests in Antitrust Market Definition," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 6(2), pages 441-464.
    3. Øystein Daljord & Lars Sørgard & Øyvind Thomassen, 2008. "The Ssnip Test And Market Definition With The Aggregate Diversion Ratio: A Reply To Katz And Shapiro," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 263-270.
    4. Baker, Jonathan B. & Bresnahan, Timothy F., 1988. "Estimating the residual demand curve facing a single firm," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 283-300.
    5. Patrick J. Coe & David Krause, 2008. "An Analysis Of Price-Based Tests Of Antitrust Market Delineation," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 983-1007.
    6. Øystein Daljord, 2009. "An Exact Arithmetic Ssnip Test For Asymmetric Products," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 563-569.
    7. Austrian Institute of Economic Research, 2006. "Competitiveness Report 2006," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 28814.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Aquino de Souza & Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro & Gerson Carvalho, 2010. "Documento de Trabalho 01/2010 - Delimitação de Mercado Relevante," Documentos de Trabalho 12010, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (Cade), Departamento de Estudos Econômicos.
    2. Zipitria, Leandro, 2010. "New Directions in Price Test for Market Definition," MPRA Paper 58046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Willem H. Boshoff, 2013. "Why define markets in competition cases?," Working Papers 10/2013, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics.
    4. Vladimír Hajko & Jaroslav Bil, 2013. "The Relevant Markets for Meat Production and Processing in the Czech Republic: Analysis of the Price Movements," Czech Economic Review, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, vol. 7(3), pages 178-197, November.
    5. Daniel Greenfield & Bruce Kobayashi & Jeremy Sandford & Christopher Taylor & Nathan Wilson, 2019. "Economics at the FTC: Quantitative Analyses of Two Chemical Manufacturing Mergers," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 55(4), pages 607-623, December.
    6. Javier Elizalde, 2012. "A theoretical approach to market definition analysis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 449-475, December.
    7. Øystein Daljord, 2009. "An Exact Arithmetic Ssnip Test For Asymmetric Products," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 563-569.
    8. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    9. Sunil P. Dhoubhadel & Azzeddine M. Azzam & Matthew C. Stockton, 2017. "Does the USA have market power in importing ethanol from Brazil?," International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2/3), pages 251-266.
    10. Nicole A. MATHYS & Jaime DE MELO, 2010. "Trade and Climate Change: The Challenges Ahead," Working Papers P14, FERDI.
    11. Alessandro Bonanno & Rigoberto A. Lopez, 2008. "Wal-Mart’s Monopsony Power in Local Labor Markets," Food Marketing Policy Center Research Reports 103, University of Connecticut, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Charles J. Zwick Center for Food and Resource Policy.
    12. Gual, Jordi, 2003. "Market Definition in the Telecoms Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 3988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Stenborg, Markku, 2002. "Economics of Joint Dominance," Discussion Papers 834, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    14. Austan Goolsbee & Chad Syverson, 2023. "Monopsony Power in Higher Education: A Tale of Two Tracks," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(S1), pages 257-290.
    15. David, Paul A. & Shapiro, Joseph S., 2008. "Community-based production of open-source software: What do we know about the developers who participate?," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 364-398, December.
    16. Juan Delgado, 2007. "Why Europe is not carbon competitive," Policy Briefs 33, Bruegel.
    17. Ozren Rafajac & Marinko Skare, 2017. "Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of X-efficiency in the Croatian Market," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(3), September.
    18. Katsoulacos Yannis & Konstantakopoulou Ioanna & Metsiou Eleni & Tsionas Efthymios, 2014. "Quantitative Price Tests in Antitrust Market Definition with an Application to the Savory Snacks Markets," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-33, January.
    19. Bottasso, Anna & Conti, Maurizio & Ferrari, Claudio & Tei, Alessio, 2014. "Ports and regional development: A spatial analysis on a panel of European regions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 44-55.
    20. Uhl Kerstin Marit & Perekhozhuk Oleksandr & Glauben Thomas, 2019. "Russian Market Power in International Wheat Exports: Evidence from a Residual Demand Elasticity Analysis," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:atg:wpaper:2010010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Guilherme Mendes Resende (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caegvbr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.