IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2410.14059.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

UCFE: A User-Centric Financial Expertise Benchmark for Large Language Models

Author

Listed:
  • Yuzhe Yang
  • Yifei Zhang
  • Yan Hu
  • Yilin Guo
  • Ruoli Gan
  • Yueru He
  • Mingcong Lei
  • Xiao Zhang
  • Haining Wang
  • Qianqian Xie
  • Jimin Huang
  • Honghai Yu
  • Benyou Wang

Abstract

This paper introduces the UCFE: User-Centric Financial Expertise benchmark, an innovative framework designed to evaluate the ability of large language models (LLMs) to handle complex real-world financial tasks. UCFE benchmark adopts a hybrid approach that combines human expert evaluations with dynamic, task-specific interactions to simulate the complexities of evolving financial scenarios. Firstly, we conducted a user study involving 804 participants, collecting their feedback on financial tasks. Secondly, based on this feedback, we created our dataset that encompasses a wide range of user intents and interactions. This dataset serves as the foundation for benchmarking 12 LLM services using the LLM-as-Judge methodology. Our results show a significant alignment between benchmark scores and human preferences, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.78, confirming the effectiveness of the UCFE dataset and our evaluation approach. UCFE benchmark not only reveals the potential of LLMs in the financial sector but also provides a robust framework for assessing their performance and user satisfaction. The benchmark dataset and evaluation code are available.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuzhe Yang & Yifei Zhang & Yan Hu & Yilin Guo & Ruoli Gan & Yueru He & Mingcong Lei & Xiao Zhang & Haining Wang & Qianqian Xie & Jimin Huang & Honghai Yu & Benyou Wang, 2024. "UCFE: A User-Centric Financial Expertise Benchmark for Large Language Models," Papers 2410.14059, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2410.14059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.14059
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2410.14059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.