IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2110.11718.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Liquidity-free implied volatilities: an approach using conic finance

Author

Listed:
  • Matteo Michielon
  • Asma Khedher
  • Peter Spreij

Abstract

We consider the problem of calculating risk-neutral implied volatilities of European options without relying on option mid prices but solely on bid and ask prices. We provide an approach, based on the conic finance paradigm, that allows to uniquely strip risk-neutral implied volatilities from bid and ask quotes, and that does not require restrictive assumptions. Our methodology also allows to jointly calculate the implied liquidity of the market. The idea outlined in this paper can be applied to calculate other implied parameters from bid and ask security prices as soon as their theoretical risk-neutral counterparts are strictly increasing with respect to the former.

Suggested Citation

  • Matteo Michielon & Asma Khedher & Peter Spreij, 2021. "Liquidity-free implied volatilities: an approach using conic finance," Papers 2110.11718, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2110.11718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.11718
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Ismail Iyigunler & Rodrigo Rodriguez, 2012. "Dynamic Conic Finance: Pricing and Hedging in Market Models with Transaction Costs via Dynamic Coherent Acceptability Indices," Papers 1205.4790, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    2. Carr, Peter & Madan, Dilip B. & Melamed, Michael & Schoutens, Wim, 2016. "Hedging insurance books," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 364-372.
    3. Xi Fu & Eser Arisoy & Mark Shackleton & Mehmet Umutlu, 2016. "Option-Implied Volatility Measures and Stock Return Predictability," Post-Print hal-01484672, HAL.
    4. Cao, Charles & Simin, Timothy & Xiao, Han, 2019. "Predicting the equity premium with the implied volatility spread," MPRA Paper 103651, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Szakmary, Andrew & Ors, Evren & Kyoung Kim, Jin & Davidson, Wallace III, 2003. "The predictive power of implied volatility: Evidence from 35 futures markets," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(11), pages 2151-2175, November.
    6. Matteo Michielon & Asma Khedher & Peter Spreij, 2021. "From bid-ask credit default swap quotes to risk-neutral default probabilities using distorted expectations," Papers 2108.06578, arXiv.org.
    7. Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 571-587, May.
    8. Madan,Dilip & Schoutens,Wim, 2016. "Applied Conic Finance," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107151697, November.
    9. Dilip B. Madan, 2012. "From credit valuation adjustments to credit capital commitments," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(6), pages 839-845, April.
    10. Byeong-Je An & Andrew Ang & Turan G. Bali & Nusret Cakici, 2014. "The Joint Cross Section of Stocks and Options," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2279-2337, October.
    11. Maxim Ulrich & Simon Walther, 0. "Option-implied information: What’s the vol surface got to do with it?," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-33.
    12. Kast, Robert & Lapied, André & Roubaud, David, 2014. "Modelling under ambiguity with dynamically consistent Choquet random walks and Choquet–Brownian motions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 495-503.
    13. Cao, Charles & Simin, Timothy & Xiao, Han, 2020. "Predicting the equity premium with the implied volatility spread," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Dilip B. Madan & Alexander Cherny, 2010. "Markets As A Counterparty: An Introduction To Conic Finance," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(08), pages 1149-1177.
    15. Didier Sornette & Peter Cauwels & Georgi Smilyanov, 2017. "Can We Use Volatility to Diagnose Financial Bubbles? Lessons from 40 Historical Bubbles," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 17-27, Swiss Finance Institute.
    16. Alexander Cherny & Dilip Madan, 2009. "New Measures for Performance Evaluation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(7), pages 2371-2406, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dilip B. Madan & Wim Schoutens & King Wang, 2017. "Measuring And Monitoring The Efficiency Of Markets," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Li, Zhe & Zhang, Weiguo & Zhang, Yue & Yi, Zhigao, 2019. "An analytical approximation approach for pricing European options in a two-price economy," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    3. Leippold, Markus & Schärer, Steven, 2017. "Discrete-time option pricing with stochastic liquidity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Righi, Marcelo Brutti, 2024. "Star-shaped acceptability indexes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 170-181.
    5. Florence Guillaume & Gero Junike & Peter Leoni & Wim Schoutens, 2019. "Implied liquidity risk premia in option markets," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 233-246, June.
    6. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Tao Chen, 2014. "Dynamic Conic Finance via Backward Stochastic Difference Equations," Papers 1412.6459, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2014.
    7. Dilip B. Madan, 2016. "Conic Portfolio Theory," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-42, May.
    8. Lucio Fiorin & Wim Schoutens, 2020. "Conic quantization: stochastic volatility and market implied liquidity," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 531-542, April.
    9. Marcin Pitera & Mikl'os R'asonyi, 2023. "Utility-based acceptability indices," Papers 2310.02014, arXiv.org.
    10. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Marcin Pitera, 2016. "A survey of time consistency of dynamic risk measures and dynamic performance measures in discrete time: LM-measure perspective," Papers 1603.09030, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2017.
    11. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Ismail Iyigunler & Rodrigo Rodriguez, 2012. "Dynamic Conic Finance: Pricing and Hedging in Market Models with Transaction Costs via Dynamic Coherent Acceptability Indices," Papers 1205.4790, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2013.
    12. Tomasz R. Bielecki & Igor Cialenco & Hao Liu, 2023. "Time consistency of dynamic risk measures and dynamic performance measures generated by distortion functions," Papers 2309.02570, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    13. Siu, Tak Kuen, 2023. "European option pricing with market frictions, regime switches and model uncertainty," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 233-250.
    14. Steven Kou & Xianhua Peng, 2016. "On the Measurement of Economic Tail Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(5), pages 1056-1072, October.
    15. Enrico G. De Giorgi & David B. Brown & Melvyn Sim, 2010. "Dual representation of choice and aspirational preferences," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2010 2010-07, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    16. Dilip B. Madan & King Wang, 2022. "Two sided efficient frontiers at multiple time horizons," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 327-353, September.
    17. Dilip B. Madan & King Wang, 2023. "Measuring Dependence in a Set of Asset Returns," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 30(2), pages 363-385, June.
    18. Dilip Madan, 2011. "Joint risk-neutral laws and hedging," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(12), pages 840-850.
    19. Sun, Xianming & Gan, Siqing & Vanmaele, Michèle, 2015. "Analytical approximation for distorted expectations," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 246-252.
    20. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2110.11718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.