IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2007.03494.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Volatility model calibration with neural networks a comparison between direct and indirect methods

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Roeder
  • Georgi Dimitroff

Abstract

In a recent paper "Deep Learning Volatility" a fast 2-step deep calibration algorithm for rough volatility models was proposed: in the first step the time consuming mapping from the model parameter to the implied volatilities is learned by a neural network and in the second step standard solver techniques are used to find the best model parameter. In our paper we compare these results with an alternative direct approach where the the mapping from market implied volatilities to model parameters is approximated by the neural network, without the need for an extra solver step. Using a whitening procedure and a projection of the target parameter to [0,1], in order to be able to use a sigmoid type output function we found that the direct approach outperforms the two-step one for the data sets and methods published in "Deep Learning Volatility". For our implementation we use the open source tensorflow 2 library. The paper should be understood as a technical comparison of neural network techniques and not as an methodically new Ansatz.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Roeder & Georgi Dimitroff, 2020. "Volatility model calibration with neural networks a comparison between direct and indirect methods," Papers 2007.03494, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2007.03494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2007.03494
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnan Kessy & Alex Lewin & Korbinian Strimmer, 2018. "Optimal Whitening and Decorrelation," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(4), pages 309-314, October.
    2. Christian Bayer & Peter Friz & Jim Gatheral, 2016. "Pricing under rough volatility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(6), pages 887-904, June.
    3. Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Mehdi Tomas, 2019. "Deep Learning Volatility," Papers 1901.09647, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damiano Brigo & Xiaoshan Huang & Andrea Pallavicini & Haitz Saez de Ocariz Borde, 2021. "Interpretability in deep learning for finance: a case study for the Heston model," Papers 2104.09476, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hans Buhler & Blanka Horvath & Terry Lyons & Imanol Perez Arribas & Ben Wood, 2020. "A Data-driven Market Simulator for Small Data Environments," Papers 2006.14498, arXiv.org.
    2. Damiano Brigo & Xiaoshan Huang & Andrea Pallavicini & Haitz Saez de Ocariz Borde, 2021. "Interpretability in deep learning for finance: a case study for the Heston model," Papers 2104.09476, arXiv.org.
    3. Christian Bayer & Blanka Horvath & Aitor Muguruza & Benjamin Stemper & Mehdi Tomas, 2019. "On deep calibration of (rough) stochastic volatility models," Papers 1908.08806, arXiv.org.
    4. Jim Gatheral & Paul Jusselin & Mathieu Rosenbaum, 2020. "The quadratic rough Heston model and the joint S&P 500/VIX smile calibration problem," Papers 2001.01789, arXiv.org.
    5. Jan Matas & Jan Posp'iv{s}il, 2021. "Robustness and sensitivity analyses for rough Volterra stochastic volatility models," Papers 2107.12462, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    6. Antoine Jacquier & Emma R. Malone & Mugad Oumgari, 2019. "Stacked Monte Carlo for option pricing," Papers 1903.10795, arXiv.org.
    7. Christian Bayer & Peter K. Friz & Paul Gassiat & Jorg Martin & Benjamin Stemper, 2020. "A regularity structure for rough volatility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 782-832, July.
    8. Eduardo Abi Jaber, 2022. "The characteristic function of Gaussian stochastic volatility models: an analytic expression," Working Papers hal-02946146, HAL.
    9. Eduardo Abi Jaber, 2022. "The characteristic function of Gaussian stochastic volatility models: an analytic expression," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 733-769, October.
    10. Stefano De Marco, 2020. "On the harmonic mean representation of the implied volatility," Papers 2007.03585, arXiv.org.
    11. Mikkel Bennedsen & Asger Lunde & Mikko S. Pakkanen, 2017. "Decoupling the short- and long-term behavior of stochastic volatility," CREATES Research Papers 2017-26, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    12. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Li, Chenxu & Li, Chen Xu, 2021. "Closed-form implied volatility surfaces for stochastic volatility models with jumps," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 364-392.
    13. Calypso Herrera & Florian Krach & Pierre Ruyssen & Josef Teichmann, 2021. "Optimal Stopping via Randomized Neural Networks," Papers 2104.13669, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    14. Zhu, Qinwen & Diao, Xundi & Wu, Chongfeng, 2023. "Volatility forecast with the regularity modifications," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    15. Bastien Baldacci, 2020. "High-frequency dynamics of the implied volatility surface," Papers 2012.10875, arXiv.org.
    16. Archil Gulisashvili, 2022. "Multivariate Stochastic Volatility Models and Large Deviation Principles," Papers 2203.09015, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    17. Blanka Horvath & Antoine Jacquier & Aitor Muguruza & Andreas Søjmark, 2024. "Functional central limit theorems for rough volatility," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 615-661, July.
    18. Masaaki Fukasawa & Tetsuya Takabatake & Rebecca Westphal, 2019. "Is Volatility Rough ?," Papers 1905.04852, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    19. Siu Hin Tang & Mathieu Rosenbaum & Chao Zhou, 2023. "Forecasting Volatility with Machine Learning and Rough Volatility: Example from the Crypto-Winter," Papers 2311.04727, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    20. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & David J. Prömel & Ludovic Tangpi, 2019. "Duality for pathwise superhedging in continuous time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 697-728, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2007.03494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.