IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2001.00622.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An FBSDE approach to market impact games with stochastic parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Drapeau
  • Peng Luo
  • Alexander Schied
  • Dewen Xiong

Abstract

We analyze a market impact game between $n$ risk averse agents who compete for liquidity in a market impact model with permanent price impact and additional slippage. Most market parameters, including volatility and drift, are allowed to vary stochastically. Our first main result characterizes the Nash equilibrium in terms of a fully coupled system of forward-backward stochastic differential equations (FBSDEs). Our second main result provides conditions under which this system of FBSDEs has indeed a unique solution, which in turn yields the unique Nash equilibrium. We furthermore obtain closed-form solutions in special situations and analyze them numerically

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Drapeau & Peng Luo & Alexander Schied & Dewen Xiong, 2019. "An FBSDE approach to market impact games with stochastic parameters," Papers 2001.00622, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2001.00622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2001.00622
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Market Impact Game Under Transient Price Impact," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 102-121, February.
    2. Alexander Schied & Elias Strehle & Tao Zhang, 2015. "High-frequency limit of Nash equilibria in a market impact game with transient price impact," Papers 1509.08281, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    3. Tse & Forsyth & Kennedy & Windcliff, 2013. "Comparison Between the Mean-Variance Optimal and the Mean-Quadratic-Variation Optimal Trading Strategies," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 415-449, November.
    4. Jim Gatheral, 2010. "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 749-759.
    5. Alexander Schied, 2012. "A control problem with fuel constraint and Dawson-Watanabe superprocesses," Papers 1207.5809, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2013.
    6. Robert Almgren, 2003. "Optimal execution with nonlinear impact functions and trading-enhanced risk," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18.
    7. Bruce Ian Carlin & Miguel Sousa Lobo & S. Viswanathan, 2007. "Episodic Liquidity Crises: Cooperative and Predatory Trading," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(5), pages 2235-2274, October.
    8. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2017. "A State-Constrained Differential Game Arising In Optimal Portfolio Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 779-802, July.
    9. Ulrich Horst & Jinniao Qiu & Qi Zhang, 2014. "A Constrained Control Problem with Degenerate Coefficients and Degenerate Backward SPDEs with Singular Terminal Condition," Papers 1407.0108, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2015.
    10. Paulwin Graewe & Ulrich Horst & Jinniao Qiu, 2013. "A Non-Markovian Liquidation Problem and Backward SPDEs with Singular Terminal Conditions," Papers 1309.0461, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    11. Forsyth, P.A. & Kennedy, J.S. & Tse, S.T. & Windcliff, H., 2012. "Optimal trade execution: A mean quadratic variation approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 1971-1991.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guanxing Fu & Paul P. Hager & Ulrich Horst, 2024. "A Mean-Field Game of Market Entry: Portfolio Liquidation with Trading Constraints," Papers 2403.10441, arXiv.org.
    2. Rama Cont & Alessandro Micheli & Eyal Neuman, 2022. "Fast and Slow Optimal Trading with Exogenous Information," Papers 2210.01901, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    3. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2020. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Papers 2011.05589, arXiv.org.
    4. Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2021. "Trading with the Crowd," Papers 2106.09267, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2020. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Papers 2011.05589, arXiv.org.
    2. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich & Xia, Xiaonyu, 2022. "Portfolio Liquidation Games with Self-Exciting Order Flow," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 327, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2022. "Portfolio liquidation games with self‐exciting order flow," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1020-1065, October.
    4. Moritz Voß, 2022. "A two-player portfolio tracking game," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 16, number 6, October.
    5. Graewe, Paulwin & Popier, Alexandre, 2021. "Asymptotic approach for backward stochastic differential equation with singular terminal condition," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 247-277.
    6. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    7. Kruse, T. & Popier, A., 2016. "Minimal supersolutions for BSDEs with singular terminal condition and application to optimal position targeting," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 2554-2592.
    8. Alexander Schied & Tao Zhang, 2019. "A Market Impact Game Under Transient Price Impact," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 102-121, February.
    9. Xiangge Luo & Alexander Schied, 2018. "Nash equilibrium for risk-averse investors in a market impact game with transient price impact," Papers 1807.03813, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2019.
    10. Moritz Vo{ss}, 2019. "A two-player portfolio tracking game," Papers 1911.05122, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    11. Elliott, Robert & Qiu, Jinniao & Wei, Wenning, 2022. "Neumann problem for backward SPDEs with singular terminal conditions and application in constrained stochastic control under target zone," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 68-97.
    12. Julia Ackermann & Thomas Kruse & Mikhail Urusov, 2020. "Optimal trade execution in an order book model with stochastic liquidity parameters," Papers 2006.05843, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    13. Graewe, Paulwin & Horst, Ulrich & Séré, Eric, 2018. "Smooth solutions to portfolio liquidation problems under price-sensitive market impact," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 128(3), pages 979-1006.
    14. Christoph Belak & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Kevin Ou, 2018. "Optimal Trading with General Signals and Liquidation in Target Zone Models," Papers 1808.00515, arXiv.org.
    15. Eyal Neuman & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2020. "Optimal Signal-Adaptive Trading with Temporary and Transient Price Impact," Papers 2002.09549, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    16. Paulwin Graewe & Ulrich Horst & Eric S'er'e, 2013. "Smooth solutions to portfolio liquidation problems under price-sensitive market impact," Papers 1309.0474, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2017.
    17. Francesco Cordoni & Fabrizio Lillo, 2022. "Transient impact from the Nash equilibrium of a permanent market impact game," Papers 2205.00494, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    18. Charles-Albert Lehalle & Eyal Neuman, 2019. "Incorporating signals into optimal trading," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 275-311, April.
    19. Yan, Tingjin & Chiu, Mei Choi & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2023. "Portfolio liquidation with delayed information," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    20. Francesco Cordoni & Fabrizio Lillo, 2020. "Instabilities in Multi-Asset and Multi-Agent Market Impact Games," Papers 2004.03546, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2001.00622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.