IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1807.02227.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Polynomial time algorithm for optimal stopping with fixed accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Goldberg
  • Yilun Chen

Abstract

The problem of high-dimensional path-dependent optimal stopping (OS) is important to multiple academic communities and applications. Modern OS tasks often have a large number of decision epochs, and complicated non-Markovian dynamics, making them especially challenging. Standard approaches, often relying on ADP, duality, deep learning and other heuristics, have shown strong empirical performance, yet have limited rigorous guarantees (which may scale exponentially in the problem parameters and/or require previous knowledge of basis functions or additional continuity assumptions). Although past work has placed these problems in the framework of computational complexity and polynomial-time approximability, those analyses were limited to simple one-dimensional problems. For long-horizon complex OS problems, is a polynomial time solution even theoretically possible? We prove that given access to an efficient simulator of the underlying information process, and fixed accuracy epsilon, there exists an algorithm that returns an epsilon-optimal solution (both stopping policies and approximate optimal values) with computational complexity scaling polynomially in the time horizon and underlying dimension. Like the first polynomial-time (approximation) algorithms for several other well-studied problems, our theoretical guarantees are polynomial yet impractical. Our approach is based on a novel expansion for the optimal value which may be of independent interest.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Goldberg & Yilun Chen, 2018. "Polynomial time algorithm for optimal stopping with fixed accuracy," Papers 1807.02227, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1807.02227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.02227
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leif Andersen & Mark Broadie, 2004. "Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1222-1234, September.
    2. Marcel Nutz & Jianfeng Zhang, 2012. "Optimal stopping under adverse nonlinear expectation and related games," Papers 1212.2140, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    3. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    4. Prasad Chalasani & Somesh Jha, 2001. "Randomized Stopping Times and American Option Pricing with Transaction Costs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(1), pages 33-77, January.
    5. John Schoenmakers, 2012. "A pure martingale dual for multiple stopping," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 319-334, April.
    6. Ankush Agarwal & Sandeep Juneja & Ronnie Sircar, 2016. "American options under stochastic volatility: control variates, maturity randomization & multiscale asymptotics," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 17-30, January.
    7. Denis Belomestny, 2009. "On the rates of convergence of simulation based optimization algorithms for optimal stopping problems," Papers 0909.3570, arXiv.org.
    8. Denis Belomestny & Christian Bender & John Schoenmakers, 2009. "True Upper Bounds For Bermudan Products Via Non‐Nested Monte Carlo," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(1), pages 53-71, January.
    9. Beveridge, Christopher & Joshi, Mark & Tang, Robert, 2013. "Practical policy iteration: Generic methods for obtaining rapid and tight bounds for Bermudan exotic derivatives using Monte Carlo simulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 1342-1361.
    10. Vladislav Kargin, 2005. "Lattice Option Pricing By Multidimensional Interpolation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(4), pages 635-647, October.
    11. Denis Belomestny & John Schoenmakers, 2018. "Advanced Simulation-Based Methods for Optimal Stopping and Control," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-03351-2, December.
    12. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4273 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    14. Christian Bender & Anastasia Kolodko & John Schoenmakers, 2008. "Enhanced policy iteration for American options via scenario selection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 135-146.
    15. Lars Stentoft, 2004. "Convergence of the Least Squares Monte Carlo Approach to American Option Valuation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1193-1203, September.
    16. Philip Protter & Emmanuelle Clément & Damien Lamberton, 2002. "An analysis of a least squares regression method for American option pricing," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 449-471.
    17. Denis Belomestny & John Schoenmakers & Fabian Dickmann, 2013. "Multilevel dual approach for pricing American style derivatives," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 717-742, October.
    18. Sören Christensen, 2014. "A Method For Pricing American Options Using Semi-Infinite Linear Programming," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 156-172, January.
    19. Helin Zhu & Fan Ye & Enlu Zhou, 2015. "Fast estimation of true bounds on Bermudan option prices under jump-diffusion processes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(11), pages 1885-1900, November.
    20. Bank, Peter & Föllmer, Hans, 2003. "American Options, Multi-armed Bandits, and Optimal Consumption Plans : A Unifying View," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 2003,46, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    21. Denis Belomestny, 2011. "Pricing Bermudan options by nonparametric regression: optimal rates of convergence for lower estimates," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 655-683, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kirkby, J. Lars & Nguyen, Dang H. & Nguyen, Duy, 2020. "A general continuous time Markov chain approximation for multi-asset option pricing with systems of correlated diffusions," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    2. Dragos Florin Ciocan & Velibor V. Mišić, 2022. "Interpretable Optimal Stopping," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1616-1638, March.
    3. D. Belomestny & M. Kaledin & J. Schoenmakers, 2019. "Semi-tractability of optimal stopping problems via a weighted stochastic mesh algorithm," Papers 1906.09431, arXiv.org.
    4. Li, Chenxu & Ye, Yongxin, 2019. "Pricing and Exercising American Options: an Asymptotic Expansion Approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Jalaj Bhandari & Daniel Russo & Raghav Singal, 2021. "A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning with Linear Function Approximation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 950-973, May.
    6. Liu, Yue & Tian, Lixin & Sun, Huaping & Zhang, Xiling & Kong, Chuimin, 2022. "Option pricing of carbon asset and its application in digital decision-making of carbon asset," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    7. Denis Belomestny & Maxim Kaledin & John Schoenmakers, 2020. "Semitractability of optimal stopping problems via a weighted stochastic mesh algorithm," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1591-1616, October.
    8. Bradley Sturt, 2021. "A nonparametric algorithm for optimal stopping based on robust optimization," Papers 2103.03300, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    9. Sebastian Becker & Patrick Cheridito & Arnulf Jentzen & Timo Welti, 2019. "Solving high-dimensional optimal stopping problems using deep learning," Papers 1908.01602, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Andrew Yap Swee Guan, 2015. "Regression and Convex Switching System Methods for Stochastic Control Problems with Applications to Multiple-Exercise Options," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 26, July-Dece.
    2. Sebastian Becker & Patrick Cheridito & Arnulf Jentzen & Timo Welti, 2019. "Solving high-dimensional optimal stopping problems using deep learning," Papers 1908.01602, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    3. Jeechul Woo & Chenru Liu & Jaehyuk Choi, 2024. "Leave‐one‐out least squares Monte Carlo algorithm for pricing Bermudan options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(8), pages 1404-1428, August.
    4. Jérôme Lelong, 2019. "Pricing path-dependent Bermudan options using Wiener chaos expansion: an embarrassingly parallel approach," Working Papers hal-01983115, HAL.
    5. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Paletta, Tommaso & Tunaru, Radu, 2017. "An improved least squares Monte Carlo valuation method based on heteroscedasticity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 698-706.
    6. Nan Chen & Yanchu Liu, 2014. "American Option Sensitivities Estimation via a Generalized Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 616-632, June.
    7. J'er^ome Lelong, 2019. "Pricing path-dependent Bermudan options using Wiener chaos expansion: an embarrassingly parallel approach," Papers 1901.05672, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    8. Roger J. A. Laeven & John G. M. Schoenmakers & Nikolaus F. F. Schweizer & Mitja Stadje, 2020. "Robust Multiple Stopping -- A Pathwise Duality Approach," Papers 2006.01802, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    9. Nicholas Andrew Yap Swee Guan, 2015. "Regression and Convex Switching System Methods for Stochastic Control Problems with Applications to Multiple-Exercise Options," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 5-2015, January-A.
    10. Jin, Xing & Yang, Cheng-Yu, 2016. "Efficient estimation of lower and upper bounds for pricing higher-dimensional American arithmetic average options by approximating their payoff functions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 65-77.
    11. Denis Belomestny & John Schoenmakers & Fabian Dickmann, 2013. "Multilevel dual approach for pricing American style derivatives," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 717-742, October.
    12. Volker Krätschmer & Marcel Ladkau & Roger J. A. Laeven & John G. M. Schoenmakers & Mitja Stadje, 2018. "Optimal Stopping Under Uncertainty in Drift and Jump Intensity," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 1177-1209, November.
    13. Denis Belomestny & Grigori Milstein & Vladimir Spokoiny, 2009. "Regression methods in pricing American and Bermudan options using consumption processes," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 315-327.
    14. Li, Chenxu & Ye, Yongxin, 2019. "Pricing and Exercising American Options: an Asymptotic Expansion Approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Yi Yang & Jianan Wang & Youhua Chen & Zhiyuan Chen & Yanchu Liu, 2020. "Optimal procurement strategies for contractual assembly systems with fluctuating procurement price," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 1027-1059, August.
    16. Vijay V. Desai & Vivek F. Farias & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2012. "Pathwise Optimization for Optimal Stopping Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(12), pages 2292-2308, December.
    17. Lukas Gonon, 2022. "Deep neural network expressivity for optimal stopping problems," Papers 2210.10443, arXiv.org.
    18. Zhiyi Shen & Chengguo Weng, 2019. "A Backward Simulation Method for Stochastic Optimal Control Problems," Papers 1901.06715, arXiv.org.
    19. Alexander Boogert & Cyriel de Jong, 2007. "Gas Storage Valuation Using a Monte Carlo Method," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0704, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    20. Denis Belomestny & Stefan Hafner & Mikhail Urusov, 2016. "Regression-based complexity reduction of the nested Monte Carlo methods," Papers 1611.06344, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1807.02227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.