IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1304.2942.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal execution comparison across risks and dynamics, with solutions for displaced diffusions

Author

Listed:
  • Damiano Brigo
  • Giuseppe Di Graziano

Abstract

We solve a version of the optimal trade execution problem when the mid asset price follows a displaced diffusion. Optimal strategies in the adapted class under various risk criteria, namely value-at-risk, expected shortfall and a new criterion called "squared asset expectation" (SAE), related to a version of the cost variance measure, are derived and compared. It is well known that displaced diffusions (DD) exhibit dynamics which are in-between arithmetic Brownian motions (ABM) and geometric Brownian motions (GBM) depending of the choice of the shift parameter. Furthermore, DD allows for changes in the support of the mid asset price distribution, allowing one to include a minimum permitted value for the mid price, either positive or negative. We study the dependence of the optimal solution on the choice of the risk aversion criterion. Optimal solutions across criteria and asset dynamics are comparable although differences are not negligible for high levels of risk aversion and low market impact assets. This is illustrated with numerical examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Damiano Brigo & Giuseppe Di Graziano, 2013. "Optimal execution comparison across risks and dynamics, with solutions for displaced diffusions," Papers 1304.2942, arXiv.org, revised May 2014.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1304.2942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.2942
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jim Gatheral & Alexander Schied, 2011. "Optimal Trade Execution Under Geometric Brownian Motion In The Almgren And Chriss Framework," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 353-368.
    2. Alexander Schied, 2012. "Robust Strategies for Optimal Order Execution in the Almgren-Chriss Framework," Papers 1204.2717, arXiv.org, revised May 2013.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xue Cheng & Marina Di Giacinto & Tai-Ho Wang, 2019. "Optimal execution with dynamic risk adjustment," Papers 1901.00617, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Lorenz & Alexander Schied, 2013. "Drift dependence of optimal trade execution strategies under transient price impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 743-770, October.
    2. Julien Vaes & Raphael Hauser, 2018. "Optimal Trade Execution with Uncertain Volume Target," Papers 1810.11454, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    3. Phillip Monin, 2014. "Hedging Market Risk in Optimal Liquidation," Working Papers 14-08, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    4. Brunovský, Pavol & Černý, Aleš & Komadel, Ján, 2018. "Optimal trade execution under endogenous pressure to liquidate: Theory and numerical solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1159-1171.
    5. Kashyap, Ravi, 2020. "David vs Goliath (You against the Markets), A dynamic programming approach to separate the impact and timing of trading costs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    6. Arne Lokka & Junwei Xu, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model with Levy processes," Papers 2002.03376, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    7. Horst, Ulrich & Xia, Xiaonyu & Zhou, Chao, 2021. "Portfolio Liquidation under Factor Uncertainty," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 274, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    8. Chiara Benazzoli & Luca Di Persio, 2017. "Optimal execution strategy in liquidity framework," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1364902-136, January.
    9. Colaneri, Katia & Eksi, Zehra & Frey, Rüdiger & Szölgyenyi, Michaela, 2020. "Optimal liquidation under partial information with price impact," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(4), pages 1913-1946.
    10. Lokka, A. & Xu, Junwei, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106977, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Erhan Bayraktar & Alexander Munk, 2017. "Mini-Flash Crashes, Model Risk, and Optimal Execution," Papers 1705.09827, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    12. Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia & Chao Zhou, 2019. "Portfolio liquidation under factor uncertainty," Papers 1909.00748, arXiv.org.
    13. Eyal Neuman & Alexander Schied, 2018. "Protecting Pegged Currency Markets from Speculative Investors," Papers 1801.07784, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    14. Xiaoyue Li & John M. Mulvey, 2023. "Optimal Portfolio Execution in a Regime-switching Market with Non-linear Impact Costs: Combining Dynamic Program and Neural Network," Papers 2306.08809, arXiv.org.
    15. Olivier Guéant & Charles-Albert Lehalle, 2015. "General Intensity Shapes In Optimal Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 457-495, July.
    16. Claudio Bellani & Damiano Brigo, 2021. "Mechanics of good trade execution in the framework of linear temporary market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 143-163, January.
    17. Fengpei Li & Vitalii Ihnatiuk & Ryan Kinnear & Anderson Schneider & Yuriy Nevmyvaka, 2022. "Do price trajectory data increase the efficiency of market impact estimation?," Papers 2205.13423, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    18. Yan Dolinsky & Doron Greenstein, 2024. "A Note on Optimal Liquidation with Linear Price Impact," Papers 2402.14100, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    19. Cesari, Riccardo & Marzo, Massimiliano & Zagaglia, Paolo, 2012. "Effective Trade Execution," MPRA Paper 39619, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2022. "Portfolio liquidation games with self‐exciting order flow," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1020-1065, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1304.2942. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.