IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1204.2717.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Robust Strategies for Optimal Order Execution in the Almgren-Chriss Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Schied

Abstract

Assuming geometric Brownian motion as unaffected price process $S^0$, Gatheral & Schied (2011) derived a strategy for optimal order execution that reacts in a sensible manner on market changes but can still be computed in closed form. Here we will investigate the robustness of this strategy with respect to misspecification of the law of $S^0$. We prove the surprising result that the strategy remains optimal whenever $S^0$ is a square-integrable martingale. We then analyze the optimization criterion of Gatheral & Schied (2011) in the case in which $S^0$ is any square-integrable semimartingale and we give a closed-form solution to this problem. As a corollary, we find an explicit solution to the problem of minimizing the expected liquidation costs when the unaffected price process is a square-integrable semimartingale. The solutions to our problems are found by stochastically solving a finite-fuel control problem without assumptions of Markovianity.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Schied, 2012. "Robust Strategies for Optimal Order Execution in the Almgren-Chriss Framework," Papers 1204.2717, arXiv.org, revised May 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1204.2717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.2717
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jim Gatheral & Alexander Schied, 2011. "Optimal Trade Execution Under Geometric Brownian Motion In The Almgren And Chriss Framework," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 353-368.
    2. Rama Cont, 2006. "Model Uncertainty And Its Impact On The Pricing Of Derivative Instruments," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 519-547, July.
    3. Rama Cont, 2006. "Model uncertainty and its impact on the pricing of derivative instruments," Post-Print halshs-00002695, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Phillip Monin, 2014. "Hedging Market Risk in Optimal Liquidation," Working Papers 14-08, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    2. Álvaro Cartea & Sebastian Jaimungal & Damir Kinzebulatov, 2016. "Algorithmic Trading With Learning," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(04), pages 1-30, June.
    3. Alvaro Cartea & Luhui Gan & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2018. "Trading Cointegrated Assets with Price Impact," Papers 1807.01428, arXiv.org.
    4. Brunovský, Pavol & Černý, Aleš & Komadel, Ján, 2018. "Optimal trade execution under endogenous pressure to liquidate: Theory and numerical solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1159-1171.
    5. Julien Vaes & Raphael Hauser, 2018. "Optimal Trade Execution with Uncertain Volume Target," Papers 1810.11454, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    6. Weston Barger & Matthew Lorig, 2019. "Optimal Liquidation Under Stochastic Price Impact," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-28, March.
    7. Chiara Benazzoli & Luca Di Persio, 2017. "Optimal execution strategy in liquidity framework," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1364902-136, January.
    8. Kashyap, Ravi, 2020. "David vs Goliath (You against the Markets), A dynamic programming approach to separate the impact and timing of trading costs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    9. Damiano Brigo & Giuseppe Di Graziano, 2013. "Optimal execution comparison across risks and dynamics, with solutions for displaced diffusions," Papers 1304.2942, arXiv.org, revised May 2014.
    10. Takashi Kato, 2017. "An Optimal Execution Problem in the Volume-Dependent Almgren-Chriss Model," Papers 1701.08972, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2017.
    11. Lokka, A. & Xu, Junwei, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106977, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Horst, Ulrich & Xia, Xiaonyu & Zhou, Chao, 2021. "Portfolio Liquidation under Factor Uncertainty," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 274, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    13. Colaneri, Katia & Eksi, Zehra & Frey, Rüdiger & Szölgyenyi, Michaela, 2020. "Optimal liquidation under partial information with price impact," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(4), pages 1913-1946.
    14. Christopher Lorenz & Alexander Schied, 2013. "Drift dependence of optimal trade execution strategies under transient price impact," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 743-770, October.
    15. Arne Lokka & Junwei Xu, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model with Levy processes," Papers 2002.03376, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    16. Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia & Chao Zhou, 2019. "Portfolio liquidation under factor uncertainty," Papers 1909.00748, arXiv.org.
    17. Erhan Bayraktar & Alexander Munk, 2017. "Mini-Flash Crashes, Model Risk, and Optimal Execution," Papers 1705.09827, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erhan Bayraktar & Alexander Munk, 2017. "Mini-Flash Crashes, Model Risk, and Optimal Execution," Papers 1705.09827, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2018.
    2. Christophe Boucher & Benjamin Hamidi & Patrick Kouontchou & Bertrand Maillet, 2012. "Une évaluation économique du risque de modèle pour les investisseurs de long terme," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(3), pages 591-600.
    3. Barrieu, Pauline & Scandolo, Giacomo, 2014. "Assessing financial model risk," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60084, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Carol Alexander & José María Sarabia, 2012. "Quantile Uncertainty and Value‐at‐Risk Model Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1293-1308, August.
    5. Lazar, Emese & Zhang, Ning, 2019. "Model risk of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 74-93.
    6. Patrick Beissner, 2019. "Coherent-Price Systems and Uncertainty-Neutral Valuation," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Mai Jan-Frederik & Schenk Steffen & Scherer Matthias, 2015. "Analyzing model robustness via a distortion of the stochastic root: A Dirichlet prior approach," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 32(3-4), pages 177-195, December.
    8. Virmani, Vineet, 2014. "Model Risk in Pricing Path-dependent Derivatives: An Illustration," IIMA Working Papers WP2014-03-22, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    9. Marcel Nutz, 2013. "Utility Maximization under Model Uncertainty in Discrete Time," Papers 1307.3597, arXiv.org.
    10. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Bignozzi, Valeria & Cheung, Ka Chun & Hu, Junlei & Kim, Eun-Seok, 2017. "Robust and Pareto optimality of insurance contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 720-732.
    11. Carol Alexander & Jose Maria Sarabia, 2010. "Endogenizing Model Risk to Quantile Estimates," ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2010-07, Henley Business School, University of Reading.
    12. Danielsson, Jon & James, Kevin R. & Valenzuela, Marcela & Zer, Ilknur, 2016. "Model risk of risk models," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 79-91.
    13. Johannes Siven & Rolf Poulsen, 2009. "Auto-static for the people: risk-minimizing hedges of barrier options," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 193-211, October.
    14. Jakob Sohl, 2012. "Confidence sets in nonparametric calibration of exponential L\'evy models," Papers 1202.6611, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2013.
    15. Volk-Makarewicz, Warren & Borovkova, Svetlana & Heidergott, Bernd, 2022. "Assessing the impact of jumps in an option pricing model: A gradient estimation approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 740-751.
    16. Detering, Nils & Packham, Natalie, 2018. "Model risk of contingent claims," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-036, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    17. Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2018. "A theory for combinations of risk measures," Papers 1807.01977, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    18. Michael Thaden & Carsten S. Wehn, 2020. "Model validation and model risk: reaching the end of the line?," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 382-394, December.
    19. Tunaru, Radu & Zheng, Teng, 2017. "Parameter estimation risk in asset pricing and risk management: A Bayesian approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 80-93.
    20. Barrieu, Pauline & Scandolo, Giacomo, 2015. "Assessing financial model risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 546-556.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1204.2717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.