IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aru/wpaper/201503.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Efectos intencionados y no intencionados de transferencias monetarias no condicionadas a los adultos mayores: El caso de la Renta Dignidad

Author

Listed:
  • Werner L. Hernani-Limarino

    (Fundación ARU)

  • Gary Mena

    (Fundación ARU)

Abstract

Este documento presenta una evaluación de impacto cuasi-experimental de los efectos intencionados y no intencionados de la Renta Dignidad, una pensión universal no contributiva de vejez en Bolivia, sobre variables de bienestar, ahorro, e inversión del hogar y resultados del mercado laboral de beneficiarios directos e indirectos. Aprovechamos un cambio en política exógeno que reduce la edad para ser beneficiario de 65 a 60 años para identificar los efectos causales del programa. Nuestra estrategia de identificación se base en los modelos de Diferencias-en-Diferencias y Cambios-en-Cambios para calcular no solo el efecto promedio sino también en cuantiles específicos. Encontramos que la pensión no contributiva tiene complejos efectos intencionados y no intencionados en diferentes resultados individuales y del hogar sobre diferentes tipos de individuos y hogares. En el caso de las mujeres encontramos que el programa ha incrementado en promedio el ingreso no laboral de sus hogares, lo que ha reducido su oferta laboral e ingreso laboral, lo que a su vez ha disminuido el ingreso laboral de sus hogares. En el caso de los hombres, la transferencia ha incrementado significativamente el ingreso no laboral de sus hogares, pero el incremento en el el ingreso del hogar per-cápita no es significativo.

Suggested Citation

  • Werner L. Hernani-Limarino & Gary Mena, 2015. "Efectos intencionados y no intencionados de transferencias monetarias no condicionadas a los adultos mayores: El caso de la Renta Dignidad," Working Papers 03/2015, Fundación Aru.
    • Handle: RePEc:aru:wpaper:201503
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.aru.org.bo/REPEC/pdf/efectos_intencionados_y_no_intencionados_de_transferencias_monetarias_no_condicionadas_a_los_adultos_mayores.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C de Chaisemartin & X D’HaultfŒuille, 2018. "Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 85(2), pages 999-1028.
    2. repec:aru:wpaper:201104 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2009. "Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-86, March.
    4. Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens, 2006. "Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 431-497, March.
    5. Marianne Bertrand & Esther Duflo & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2004. "How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(1), pages 249-275.
    6. Yanez-Pagans, Monica, 2008. "Culture and Human Capital Investments: Evidence of an Unconditional Cash Transfer Program in Bolivia," IZA Discussion Papers 3678, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rösner, Anja & Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich, 2020. "The impact of consumer protection in the digital age: Evidence from the European Union," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    2. Chad D. Meyerhoefer & Muzhe Yang, 2011. "The Relationship between Food Assistance and Health: A Review of the Literature and Empirical Strategies for Identifying Program Effects," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 304-344.
    3. Erlend E. Bø & Joel Slemrod & Thor O. Thoresen, 2015. "Taxes on the Internet: Deterrence Effects of Public Disclosure," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 36-62, February.
    4. David Gilchrist & Thomas Emery & Nuno Garoupa & Rok Spruk, 2023. "Synthetic Control Method: A tool for comparative case studies in economic history," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 409-445, April.
    5. Roth, Jonathan & Sant’Anna, Pedro H.C. & Bilinski, Alyssa & Poe, John, 2023. "What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 2218-2244.
    6. M. Serkan Akturk & Michael Ketzenberg, 2022. "Impact of Competitor Store Closures on a Major Retailer," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 715-730, February.
    7. Christian Volpe Martincus, 2010. "Odyssey in International Markets: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Export Promotion in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 16458, February.
    8. Lechner, Michael, 2011. "The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 165-224, November.
    9. Jones A.M & Rice N, 2009. "Econometric Evaluation of Health Policies," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 09/09, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    10. Myoung-jae Lee, 2016. "Generalized Difference in Differences With Panel Data and Least Squares Estimator," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(1), pages 134-157, February.
    11. Ben Brunckhorst, 2020. "Rural Mobility and Climate Vulnerability: Evidence from the 2015 Drought in Ethiopia," CSAE Working Paper Series 2020-17, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    12. de Hoyos, Rafael & Garcia-Moreno, Vicente A. & Patrinos, Harry Anthony, 2017. "The impact of an accountability intervention with diagnostic feedback: Evidence from Mexico," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 123-140.
    13. Lorenzo Escot & José Fernández-Cornejo & Carlos Poza, 2014. "Fathers’ Use of Childbirth Leave in Spain. The Effects of the 13-Day Paternity Leave," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 33(3), pages 419-453, June.
    14. Simon Hartmann & Rok Spruk, 2023. "The impact of unilateral BIT terminations on FDI: Quasi-experimental evidence from India," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 259-296, April.
    15. Brantly Callaway & Weige Huang, 2020. "Distributional Effects of a Continuous Treatment with an Application on Intergenerational Mobility," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(4), pages 808-842, August.
    16. Kotyrlo, Elena, 2024. "Simple and complex difference-in-differences approach," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 73, pages 119-142.
    17. Panzone, Luca A., 2022. "Conditional Promotion With A Costly Reward: An Evaluation Of A Campaign To Motivate Consumption Of Fruit And Vegetables," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322058, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Andrea Pronti & Julio Berbel, 2020. "Analysis of the impact of a volumetric tariff for irrigation in Northern Italy through the “Inverse DiD†approach," SEEDS Working Papers 1320, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jul 2020.
    19. Myoung‐Jae Lee & Young‐Sook Kim, 2014. "Difference In Differences For Stayers With A Time‐Varying Qualification: Health Expenditure Elasticity Of The Elderly," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(9), pages 1134-1145, September.
    20. Dautović, Ernest & Gambacorta, Leonardo & Reghezza, Alessio, 2023. "Supervisory policy stimulus: evidence from the euro area dividend recommendation," Working Paper Series 2796, European Central Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Evaluación de impacto; transferencias monetarias no condicionadas; sistema de protección social no contributiva; programas para adultos mayores; impact evaluation; unconditional cash transfers; non contributive social protection system; elderly programs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • I3 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aru:wpaper:201503. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Efrain Candia (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aru.org.bo/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.