IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umae08/49056.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Impact of Investment in Integrated Pest Management

Author

Listed:
  • Araji, A.A.

Abstract

Following World War II, pest control largely shifted from a biological discipline to a chemical one. Unilateral dependence on pesticides has also resulted in concentrating effort on developing high-yield crop varieties with disregard for loss of characters for tolerance or resistance to pests. The broad ecological dictum of considering the whole interacting system was generally ignored and, thus, the importance of natural enemies and the plant's own factor for resisting pests. Excessive reliance on pesticides for the last three decades has destroyed natural enemies and caused some pests to develop resistance to pesticides. Consequently, the use of frequent treatments with increasing dosages was adopted in an effort to control pests. This development, however, increased production costs of many crops without alleviating the problem (Huffaker and Smith). The rise of energy and pesticide costs combined with growing ecological and social concern about excessive pesticide use have encouraged scientific and public attention to initiate coordinated research on agricultural pests that consider the biological, cultural, and ecological aspects of controlling pests. The United States International Biological Program (IBP) initiated in 1971 with the cooperation of the National Science Foundation, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and 18 land-grant universities has set the foundation for the development and implementation of coordinated pest control programs which are more efficient and less harmful to public health and the environment. Direct techniques and methods of control utilized in integrated pest management (IPM) include : crop plant resistance, biological control, cultural control, pesticide use, attractants and repellants, and growth regulation. In addition to the direct pest control methods, collecting the necessary information by monitoring or sampling the pest population and its principal natural enemies at appropriate times of the year is required for effective management decisions. Through monitoring and short-term weather prediction it was possible in 1976 to reduce insecticide treatments of cotton from 10 to two applications per year (Huffaker and Smith). In general, IPM uses the best combination of all known control techniques and concentrates on the plants themselves rather than the pests.

Suggested Citation

  • Araji, A.A., 1981. "The Economic Impact of Investment in Integrated Pest Management," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49056, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umae08:49056
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.49056
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/49056/files/The%20economic%20impact%20of%20investment%20in%20integrated%20pest%20management.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.49056?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darwin C. Hall & Richard B. Norgaard, 1973. "On the Timing and Application of Pesticides," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(2), pages 198-201.
    2. George, P.S. & King, Gordon A., 1971. "Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States with Projections for 1980," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 11936, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David N. Bengston & H. Fred Kaiser, 1988. "Research Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Forest Service," Evaluation Review, , vol. 12(3), pages 276-290, June.
    2. Araji, A. A. & Hafez, S., 2001. "The Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Investment In Agricultural Biotechnology Research," A.E. Research Series 305028, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chenguang & Sexton, Richard J., 2009. "Impacts of Retailers’ Pricing Strategies for Produce Commodities on Farmer Welfare," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 51720, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Capps, Oral Jr. & Havlicek, Joseph Jr., 1980. "National And Regional Household Demands For Meats And Seafood In The U.S.: A Complete Systems Approach," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278409, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Lichtenberg, Erik & Zilberman, David & Archibald, Sandra O., 1990. "Economics and Pesticides," Working Papers 197750, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    6. Dunn, James E. & Heien, Dale, 1985. "The Demand For Farm Output," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, July.
    7. Antle, John M., 1981. "Implications Of Sequential Decision Making For Specification And Estimation Of Production Models," Working Papers 225694, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Ospina, Enrique & Shumway, C. Richard, 1979. "Disaggregated Analysis Of Short-Run Beef Supply Response," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Rickard, Bradley J. & Gonsalves, Jana, 2006. "Examining Potential Changes in Nutrition: Recommendations and Implications for Specialty Crops in California," Research Project Reports 121617, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, California Institute for the Study of Specialty Crops.
    10. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Sherwell, Pablo, 2005. "Spatial Asymmetry in Farm-Retail Price Transmission Associated with Fluid Milk Products," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19316, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Carambas, Maria Cristina D.M., 2005. "Analysis of Marketing Margins in Eco-Labeled Products," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24600, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Soliman, Ibrahim & Shapouri, Shahla, 1984. "Egyptian Meat Market: Policy Issues in Trade, Prices, and Expected Market Performance," MPRA Paper 66628, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Lasley, Floyd A. & Henson, William L. & Jones, Harold B., Jr., 1985. "The U.S. Turkey Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 305705, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Griffith, Garry R. & Moore, Walter B., 1991. "Livestock Production Policies And Meat Processing Margins: The Case Of New Zealand, 1967-1988," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(1), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Dhehibi, Boubaker & Lachaal, Lassaad & Chebil, Ali, 2005. "Demand Analysis for Fish in Tunisia: An Empirical Approach," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24715, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Blaylock, James R. & Blisard, William N., 1990. "Effects of Advertising on the Demand for Cheese, January 1982-June 1989," Staff Reports 278346, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Alain Carpentier & Robert D. Weaver, 1995. "The contribution of pesticides to agricultural production : a reconsideration [Le rôle des pesticides dans la production agricole : nouvelle approche]," Post-Print hal-02850939, HAL.
    19. O'Rourke, A. Desmond & Alsaffy, M. Tawhid, 1984. "Impact Of Quality On Marketing Margins: A Case Study For Washington Apples," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 15(3), pages 1-8, September.
    20. Lopez, Rigoberto A., 1988. "Political Economy of the United States Sugar Policies," Working Papers 115808, Regional Research Project NE-165 Private Strategies, Public Policies, and Food System Performance.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umae08:49056. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.