IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uidaer/305158.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Efficiency And Effectiveness Of Conservation Compliance Under The 1996 Farm Bill

Author

Listed:
  • Wu, Shunxiang
  • Walker, David J.
  • Brusven, Merlyn A.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu, Shunxiang & Walker, David J. & Brusven, Merlyn A., 1998. "The Efficiency And Effectiveness Of Conservation Compliance Under The 1996 Farm Bill," A.E. Research Series 305158, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uidaer:305158
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305158/files/aers118.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thompson, Leland C. & Atwood, Jay D. & Johnson, Stanley R., 1989. "National Implications of Mandatory Conservation Compliance," Staff General Research Papers Archive 271, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Wu, Shunxiang & Walker, David J. & Brusven, Merlyn A., 1997. "Economic and Environmental Impacts of Planting Flexibility and Conservation Compliance: Lessons from the 1985 and 1990 Farm Bills for Future Farm Legislation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 216-228, October.
    3. Dana L. Hoag & Herb A. Holloway, 1991. "Farm Production Decisions Under Cross and Conservation Compliance," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(1), pages 184-193.
    4. Wu, Shunxiang & Walker, David J. & Brusven, Merlyn A., 1997. "Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Planting Flexibility And Conservation 1990 Farm Bills For Future Farm Legislation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Tony Prato & Shunxiang Wu, 1996. "Alternative Spatial Criteria for Targeting Soil and Water Quality Improvements in an Agricultural Watershed," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 293-301.
    6. Young, C. Edwin & Westcott, Paul C., 1996. "The 1996 Farm Act Increases Market Orientation," Agricultural Information Bulletins 262100, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Marie Lynn Miranda, 1992. "Landowner Incorporation of Onsite Soil Erosion Costs: An Application to the Conservation Reserve Program," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(2), pages 434-443.
    8. Stinson, Thomas F. & Coggins, Jay S. & Ramezani, Cyrus A., 1998. "Was Fair Fair To U.S. Corn Growers? An Analysis Of The Payments Offered To Corn Growers Under The 1996 Federal Agricultural Improvement And Reform Act," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20984, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Koo, Won W. & Duncan, Marvin R. & Taylor, Richard D. & Aakre, Dwight G., 1996. "Impacts Of The Federal Agricultural Improvement And Reform Act Of 1996 (Fair Act) On The North Dakota Agricultural Economy," Agricultural Economics Reports 23150, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    10. Walker, David J. & Painter, Kathleen M., 1994. "Measuring Erosion Rate And Onsite Damage Using Gis: A Policy Application," A.E. Research Series 305118, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Shunxiang & Walker, David J. & Brusven, Merlyn A., 1997. "Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Planting Flexibility And Conservation 1990 Farm Bills For Future Farm Legislation," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Yang, Wanhong & Khanna, Madhu & Farnsworth, Richard & Onal, Hayri, 2003. "Integrating economic, environmental and GIS modeling to target cost effective land retirement in multiple watersheds," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 249-267, September.
    3. Jones, Kezelee Q. & D'Souza, Gerard E., 2001. "Trading Poultry Litter At The Watershed Level : A Goal Focusing Application," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 1-10, April.
    4. Ashok K. Mishra & Carmen L. Sandretto, 2002. "Stability of Farm Income and the Role of Nonfarm Income in U.S. Agriculture," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 208-221.
    5. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Jacobs, Keri L. & Thurman, Walter N. & Marra, Michele C., 2011. "How Farmers Bid Into the Conservation Reserve Program: An Empirical Analysis of CRP Offers Data," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103675, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Joyce Willock & Ian J. Deary & Gareth Edwards‐Jones & Gavin J. Gibson & Murray J. McGregor & Alistair Sutherland & J. Barry Dent & Oliver Morgan & Robert Grieve, 1999. "The Role of Attitudes and Objectives in Farmer Decision Making: Business and Environmentally‐Oriented Behaviour in Scotland," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 286-303, May.
    8. Vukina, Tomislav & Zheng, Xiaoyong & Marra, Michele & Levy, Armando, 2008. "Do farmers value the environment? Evidence from a conservation reserve program auction," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 1323-1332, November.
    9. Smith, Vincent H. & Goodwin, Barry K., 2003. "An Ex Post Evaluation of the Conservation Reserve, Federal Crop Insurance, and Other Government Programs: Program Participation and Soil Erosion," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Collender, Robert N. & Diao, Xinshen & Harrington, David H. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Korb, Penelope J. & Makki, Shiva S. & Morehart, Mitchell J. & Roberts, Michael J. & Roe, Terry L. , 2004. "Decoupled Payments In A Changing Policy Setting," Agricultural Economic Reports 33981, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Runge, C. Ford, 1998. "U.S. Farm Policy: Can Fair Be Fixed?," Staff Papers 13294, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Bui Dung The, 2016. "The Economics of Soil Erosion and the Choice of Land Use Systems by Upland Farmers in Central Vietnam," EEPSEA Research Report rr2016063, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Apr 2016.
    13. Alston, Julian M. & Gray, Richard S. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2001. "Wheat Disputes Under Nafta," Proceedings of the 6th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2000: Trade Liberalization Under NAFTA: Report Card on Agriculture 16842, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    14. Johnson, Roger G. & Swenson, Andrew L., 1996. "Evaluation Of North Dakota Farm Business Management Education Program," Agricultural Economics Reports 23220, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    15. Evans, Elizabeth M. & Lee, David R. & Boisvert, Richard N., 2002. "Achieving Efficiency And Equity In Irrigation Management: An Optimization Model Of The El Angel Watershed, Carchi, Ecuador," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19742, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Torre Ugarte, Daniel de la & Sanford, Scott & Skinner, Robert A. & Westcott, Paul C. & Lin, William W., 2000. "Supply Response Under The 1996 Farm Act And Implications For The U.S. Field Crops Sector," Technical Bulletins 33568, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Evans, Elizabeth M. & Lee, David R. & Boisvert, Richard N. & Arce, Blanca & Steenhuis, Tammo S. & Prano, Mauricio & Poats, Susan V., 2003. "Achieving efficiency and equity in irrigation management: an optimization model of the El Angel watershed, Carchi, Ecuador," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Westcott, Paul C. & Young, C. Edwin & Price, J. Michael, 2002. "The 2002 Farm Act: Provisions And Implications For Commodity Markets," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33745, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Eaton, Derek J.F., 1996. "The Economics of Soil Erosion: A Model of Farm Decision-Making," Discussion Papers 24134, International Institute for Environment and Development, Environmental Economics Programme.
    20. Sumner, Daniel A. & Hallstrom, Daniel G., 1997. "Commodity Policy Compatibility With Free Trade Agreements," Proceedings of the 3rd Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1997: Harmonization\Convergence\Compatibility in Agriculture and Agri-Food Policy: Canada, United States and Mexico 16914, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uidaer:305158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeuidus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.