IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278730.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Preliminary Assessment of the Integrated Crop Management Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Osborn, C. Tim
  • Hellerstein, Daniel
  • Rendleman, C. Matthew
  • Ribaudo, Marc
  • Keim, Russ

Abstract

The integrated crop management (ICM) practice, also known as special practice 53 (SP-53), was instituted on a trial basis in 1990 under the Agricultural Conservation Program. The Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service administers the program, which'provides cost sharing to encourage farmers to adopt systems incorporating integrated pest management and nutrient management practices. Analysis of the first year of ICM, based on a sample of four crops (corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton) grown in four States (Nebraska, Iowa, North Dakota, Mississippi), indicates some limited success. The primary effect of ICM appears to have been reduced nitrogen fertilizer use. Use of other fertilizers and pesticides, however, remained generally unaffected. ICM had little or no effect on crop yields. Leaching and runoff potential for pesticides was apparently reduced in some instances, while increased in others.

Suggested Citation

  • Osborn, C. Tim & Hellerstein, Daniel & Rendleman, C. Matthew & Ribaudo, Marc & Keim, Russ, 1994. "A Preliminary Assessment of the Integrated Crop Management Practice," Staff Reports 278730, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278730
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278730/files/ers-report-613.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burt, Oscar R & Brewer, Durward, 1971. "Estimation of Net Social Benefits from Outdoor Recreation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(5), pages 813-827, September.
    2. Brown, Gardner M, Jr & Mendelsohn, Robert, 1984. "The Hedonic Travel Cost Method," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 66(3), pages 427-433, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Font, Antoni Riera, 2000. "Mass Tourism and the Demand for Protected Natural Areas: A Travel Cost Approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 97-116, January.
    2. Coyne, Alison & Adamowicz, Wiktor, 1989. "Economic Effects of Environmental Quality Change on Recreation Demand," Project Report Series 232082, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    3. Scheufele, Gabriela & Pascoe, Sean, 2023. "Ecosystem accounting: Reconciling consumer surplus and exchange values for free-access recreation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    4. de Frutos, Pablo & Rodríguez-Prado, Beatriz & Latorre, Joaquín & Martínez-Peña, Fernando, 2019. "Environmental valuation and management of wild edible mushroom picking in Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 177-187.
    5. Daniel Hellerstein, 1993. "Intertemporal data and travel cost analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 3(2), pages 193-207, April.
    6. Luís Cruz & Paula Simões & Eduardo Barata, 2014. "Combining Observed and Contingent Travel Behaviour: The Best of Both Worlds?," Notas Económicas, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, issue 40, pages 7-25, December.
    7. Phaneuf, Daniel J. & Smith, V. Kerry, 2006. "Recreation Demand Models," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 671-761, Elsevier.
    8. Liao, Chih-Chien & Houston, Jack E., Jr. & Bergstrom, John C., 1989. "Recreation Demand Factor Indices: A Principal Components Analysis," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270497, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Wetzstein, Michael E., 1982. "An Economic Evaluation Of A Multi-Area Recreation System," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-5, December.
    10. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    11. Erik Wallentin, 2016. "Choice of the angler," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(6), pages 1338-1351, December.
    12. Livengood, Kerry R., 1981. "Bias in Recreation Benefit Estimates: Further Evidence," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279406, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Anthony Amoah & Peter G. Moffatt, 2021. "Willingness to pay for reliable piped water services: evidence from urban Ghana," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 805-829, October.
    14. Hof, John G. & Loomis, John B., 1983. "A Recreation Optimization Model Based On The Travel Cost Method," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, July.
    15. Lew, Daniel K., 1999. "Multi-Purpose Trip Valuation in Recreation Demand Models: Some Methodological Approaches," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 271486, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. C Price & J B Christensen & S K Humphreys, 1986. "Elasticities of Demand for Recreation Site and for Recreation Experience," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 18(9), pages 1259-1263, September.
    17. Jaffe Sonia & Weyl E. Glen, 2010. "Linear Demand Systems are Inconsistent with Discrete Choice," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    18. Bowker, James Michael & English, Donald B.K. & Donovan, Jason A., 1996. "Toward A Value For Guided Rafting On Southern Rivers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-10, December.
    19. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1991. "Consumer's Surplus versus Compensating Variation Revisited," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(5), pages 1496-1507.
    20. Patrick Hummel, 2018. "How do selling mechanisms affect profits, surplus, capacity and prices with unknown demand?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 51(1), pages 94-126, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278730. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.