IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/278261.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Futures, Options, and Farm Programs: Report to Congress on a Study Mandated by the Food Security Act of 1985

Author

Listed:
  • Heifner, Richard G.
  • Glauber, Joseph W.
  • Miranda, Mario J.
  • Plato, Gerald E.
  • Wright, Bruce H.

Abstract

Expanded use of futures and options markets by farmers can partly substitute for price support and deficiency payment programs in protecting farmers' incomes. Farmers can broaden their pricing alternatives and partly protect themselves against price declines within the year, but they can gain little interyear income stability by using futures, options, or cash forward contracts. Government programs to expand farmers' use of such contracts generally would not raise or stabilize market prices or farmers' incomes unless Government subsidies were involved. Such subsidies would be difficult to administer and offer few advantages over conventional loan and deficiency payment programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Heifner, Richard G. & Glauber, Joseph W. & Miranda, Mario J. & Plato, Gerald E. & Wright, Bruce H., 1990. "Futures, Options, and Farm Programs: Report to Congress on a Study Mandated by the Food Security Act of 1985," Staff Reports 278261, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278261
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.278261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/278261/files/ers-report-434.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.278261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heifner, Richard G. & Wright, Bruce H., 1989. "Potentials for Substituting Farmers' Use of Futures and Options for Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Glauber, Joseph W. & Miranda, Mario J., 1989. "Subsidized put options as alternatives to price supports," Technical Bulletins 312310, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Hartzmark, Michael L, 1987. "Returns to Individual Traders of Futures: Aggregate Results," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(6), pages 1292-1306, December.
    4. Grant, Dwight, 1989. "Optimal futures positions for corn and soybean growers facing price and yield risk," Technical Bulletins 312296, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Plato, Gerald, 1989. "Effects of a subsidized put option program and forward selling on farmers' revenue risks," Technical Bulletins 312313, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siebert, Jerome & Klonsky, Karen & Pradhan, Vijay, 1993. "Marketing California Cotton: An Economic and Policy Overview," CUDARE Working Papers 198627, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Heifner, Richard G. & Wright, Bruce H., 1989. "Potentials for Substituting Farmers' Use of Futures and Options for Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ashok Mishra & Barry Goodwin, 2006. "Revenue insurance purchase decisions of farmers," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 149-159.
    2. Heifner, Richard G. & Wright, Bruce H., 1989. "Potentials for Substituting Farmers' Use of Futures and Options for Farm Programs," Agricultural Economic Reports 308136, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Yoon, Byung-Sam & Brorsen, B. Wade, 2005. "Can Multiyear Rollover Hedging Increase Mean Returns?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 65-78, April.
    4. Guillermo Llorente & Jiang Wang, 2020. "Trading and information in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1231-1263, August.
    5. Robert Weiner, 2006. "Do Birds of a Feather Flock Together? Speculator Herding in the World Oil Market," RFF Working Paper Series dp-06-31, Resources for the Future.
    6. Büyükşahin, Bahattin & Robe, Michel A., 2014. "Speculators, commodities and cross-market linkages," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 38-70.
    7. Kocagil, Ahmet E. & Topyan, Kudret, 1997. "An empirical note on demand for speculation and futures risk premium: A Kalman Filter application," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 77-93.
    8. Bruno Thiago Tomio & Guillaume Vallet, 2021. "Carry Trade and Negative Policy Rates in Switzerland : Low-lying fog or storm ?," Post-Print halshs-03669561, HAL.
    9. James D. Hamilton & Jing Cynthia Wu, 2015. "Effects Of Index‐Fund Investing On Commodity Futures Prices," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(1), pages 187-205, February.
    10. Sumner, Scott, 2015. "Nominal GDP futures targeting," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 65-75.
    11. Sykuta, Michael E., 1996. "Futures trading and supply contracting in the oil refining industry," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 317-334, July.
    12. Nicole M. Moran & Scott H. Irwin & Philip Garcia, 2020. "Who Wins and Who Loses? Trader Returns and Risk Premiums in Agricultural Futures Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 611-652, December.
    13. Henry L. Bryant & David A. Bessler & Michael S. Haigh, 2006. "Causality in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(11), pages 1039-1057, November.
    14. Sang Hyuk Kim & Hee Soo Lee & Han Jun Ko & Seung Hwan Jeong & Hyun Woo Byun & Kyong Joo Oh, 2018. "Pattern Matching Trading System Based on the Dynamic Time Warping Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Wei Shi & Scott H. Irwin, 2005. "Optimal Hedging with a Subjective View: An Empirical Bayesian Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 918-930.
    16. Boyd, Naomi E. & Harris, Jeffrey H. & Li, Bingxin, 2018. "An update on speculation and financialization in commodity markets," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 91-104.
    17. Blank, Steven C., 1989. "Research On Futures Markets: Issues, Approaches, And Empirical Findings," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, July.
    18. Monson, Steven J., 1991. "Accounting for yield risk in preharvest commodity pricing decisions," ISU General Staff Papers 1991010108000018169, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Changyun Wang, 2003. "The behavior and performance of major types of futures traders," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 1-31, January.
    20. Chang, Eric C. & Michael Pinegar, J. & Schachter, Barry, 1997. "Interday variations in volume, variance and participation of large speculators," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 797-810, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:278261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.