IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerssr/276844.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Review Of Existing And Alternative Federal Dairy Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Economic Research Service

Abstract

Real milk prices 15-20 percent lower than in 1983 would approximately balance production and consumption under conditions projected for the dairy industry during the remainder of the eighties. Government purchase, storage, and disposal could effectively stabilize prices near this level, but these are wasteful means of raising prices and, thereby, enhancing producers' incomes. Other programs such as direct payments, supply control, and price discrimination can transfer income to farmers at less cost to society in the short run, but can lead to serious inefficiencies over time. Changes in the marketing order program to bring prices charged to processors and paid to producers more in line with the value of the services associated with the milk would contribute to the efficiency of the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Economic Research Service, 1984. "Review Of Existing And Alternative Federal Dairy Programs," Staff Reports 276844, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:276844
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.276844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276844/files/ers-report-105.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.276844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Novakovic, Andrew M., 1982. "A Further Analysis of the Comparative Cost of Reconstituting Beverage Milk Products," Research Bulletins 182021, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Glen D. Whipple, 1983. "An Analysis of Reconstituted Fluid Milk Pricing Policy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 207-213.
    3. Manchester, Alden C., 1978. "Dairy Price Policy: Setting, Problems, Alternatives," Agricultural Economic Reports 307682, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Boyd M. Buxton, 1977. "Welfare Implications of Alternative Classified Pricing Policies for Milk," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(3), pages 525-529.
    5. Robert T. Masson & Philip M. Eisenstat, 1980. "Welfare Impacts of Milk Orders and the Antitrust Immunities for Cooperatives," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(2), pages 270-278.
    6. John B. Riley & Leo V. Blakley, 1975. "Impact of Alternative Class I Pricing Systems on Fluid Milk Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(1), pages 67-73.
    7. Kinnucan, Henry W., 1980. "Dairy Promotion Research at Cornell: What Have We Learned?," Staff Papers 183823, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    8. Hallberg, M. C. & Hahn, D. E. & Stammer, R. W. & Elterich, G. J. & Fife, C. L., 1978. "Impact of Alternative Federal Milk Marketing Order Pricing Policies on the United States Dairy Industry," Miscellaneous Series 257743, Pennsylvania State University.
    9. Clement, Wendell E. & Henderson, Peter L. & Eley, Cleveland P., 1965. "The Effect of Different Levels of Promotional Expenditures on Sales of Fluid Milk," Miscellaneous Publications 320751, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David M., 1983. "Effects of Household Socioeconomic Features on Dairy Purchases," Technical Bulletins 157654, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Ling, K. Charles, 1982. "Pricing Plans for Managing Seasonal Deliveries by Dairy Cooperatives," Research Reports 50805, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    12. Stanley R. Thompson & Doyle A. Eiler, 1977. "Determinants of Milk Advertising Effectiveness," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(2), pages 330-335.
    13. Ippolito, Richard A & Masson, Robert T, 1978. "The Social Cost of Government Regulation of Milk," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(1), pages 33-65, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nott, Sherrill B. & Hamm, Larry G., 1986. "Quotas for U.S. Dairy Farmers? A Review," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201361, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nubern, Chris A. & Purcell, Wayne D., 1997. "Competitiveness of Dairy Producers in a Deregulated Market," Staff Papers 232553, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Chouinard, Hayley H. & Davis, David E. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 2005. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt82q751hf, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    3. Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M. & Lenz, John E. & Forker, Olan D., 1993. "Evaluating U.S. Generic Milk Advertising Effectiveness Using An Imperfect Competition Model," Research Bulletins 123015, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Hayley H. Chouinard & David E. Davis & Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Jeffrey M. Perloff, 2010. "Milk Marketing Order Winners and Losers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 59-76.
    5. McDowell, Howard & Fleming, Ann M. & Fallert, Richard F., 1988. "Federal Milk Marketing Orders: An Analysis of Alternative Policies," Agricultural Economic Reports 308061, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Dahlgran, Roger A., 1981. "Dairy Marketing And Policy Analysis: A Critical Review Of Recent Empirical Studies," Department of Economics and Business - Archive 259651, North Carolina State University, Department of Economics.
    7. Jeffrey T. LaFrance & Harry de Gorter, 1985. "Regulation in a Dynamic Market: The U.S. Dairy Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(4), pages 821-832.
    8. Fleming, Ann M. & Hamm, Larry G., 1988. "An Economic Analysis of Reverse Osmosis Filtration for Interregional Milk Marketing," Agricultural Economic Report Series 201381, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    9. Chang, Ching-Cheng & Stefanou, Spiro E., 1987. "Supply Growth And Dairy Industry Deregulation," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, April.
    10. Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M. & Lenz, John E. & Forker, Olan D., 1994. "An Analysis Of U.S. Dairy Policy Deregulation Using An Imperfect Competition Model," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-10, April.
    11. Unknown, 1985. "Proceeding of a Seminar Sponsored by Northcentral Regional Project NC-176, Northeastern Regional Project NE-153 Southern Regional Project S-166 "Dairy Modeling in the 1980's: A Symposium on Curre," Economics and Sociology Occasional Papers - ESO Series 243216, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    12. Mats Bergman, 1997. "Antitrust, Marketing Cooperatives, and Market Power," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 73-92, January.
    13. Marchant, Mary A. & Song, Baohui, 2003. "Endogenizing Government Behavior: Empirical Study Of The U.S. Dairy Price Support Program," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35103, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Cox, Thomas L. & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Jesse, Edward V., 1994. "Regional Impacts of Reducing Dairy Price Supports and Removing Milk Marketing Orders in the U.S. Dairy Sector," Staff Papers 200580, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    15. Williams, Gary W. & Myers, Lester H., 1982. "The Economic Effectiveness Of Foreign Market Development Programs: The Case Of Soybeans And Soybean Products," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279211, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Balagtas, Joseph Valdes & Sumner, Daniel A., 2004. "Milk Marketing Orders And Milk Sanitation Regulation: Re-Evaulating Marketing Orders' Welfare Effects," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20399, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Buxton, Boyd M., 1979. "Milk Marketing Order Regulations," Staff Papers 13582, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Michael T. Belongia, 1984. "The dairy price support program: a study of misdirected economic incentives," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 66(Feb), pages 5-14.
    19. Blaylock, James R. & Smallwood, David M., 1986. "U.S. Demand for Food: Household Expenditures, Demographics, and Projections," Technical Bulletins 157011, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. LaFrance, Jeffrey T., 1999. "U.S. Food and Nutrient Demand and the Effects of Agricultural Policies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt52h9v4dq, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerssr:276844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.